Attachment 6 - Sample Case File Questionnaire - Investigator Services.pdf
PDF 250 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2B-27-A-0002
- Issued by
-
United States Postal Service
About this file
This document is a questionnaire template designed to assess investigatory writing skills for the National EEO Investigative Services Office of the United States Postal Service.
The questionnaire requires respondents to review a sample EEO case file comprising an EEO Basics Packet (pages 2-34) and a Sample Case (pages 35-121), then answer 21 questions demonstrating comprehension and analytical ability. Questions 1-10 request identification of key case information including formal file date, initial contact date, complainant name and representative details, management officials named, theories of discrimination, accepted purviews/bases, and accepted issues/claims. Questions 11-15 require narrative summaries of the complainant's and management official's versions of events for the first claim, identification of the non-discriminatory business reason for management action, naming of any comparators with detailed descriptions, and listing of relevant exhibits with explanations of their significance. Questions 16-20 parallel this structure for a second claim. Question 21 asks what remedy the complainant requested. Responses must be presented in narrative form where requested, with attention to grammar, punctuation, and accuracy regarding names and dates. The completed questionnaire must be saved with the filename format "YourLastName YourFirstName Questionnaire." This is an assessment tool rather than a solicitation document.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
National EEO Investigative Services Office
Sample File Questionnaire Instructions
This questionnaire is designed to show an example of your investigatory writing skills.
Please put your name in the box at the top of the page (required).
Please open the Sample Case File, to access the EEO Basics Packet (pages 2-34) and the
Sample Case (pages 35-121). Please read through those items first, and then proceed with the base file instructions below.
You are provided a sample EEO case file to read and answer the questionnaire below based on what is provided in the file. Please read each question or statement carefully and provide your response in narrative form where requested. Please be sure to answer briefly, but thoroughly. Some responses will require more than one answer. Grammar, punctuation, and attention to detail (names, dates, etc.) are also important in this assessment.
Please save your document with the following file name:
YourLastName YourFirstName Questionnaire
YWMYB0
Highlight
1. Identify the Formal File Date:
2. Where can you find the Formal File date? (List 2 locations)
1.
2.
3. Identify the Initial Contact with EEO Office Date:
4. Where can you find the Initial contact with EEO date? (Multiple locations, name 2)
1.
2.
5. Identify the Full Name of the Complainant.
6. Does the Complainant have a representative?
If so, what is their Full Name and Title?
7. What Management Official(s) does the Complainant allege is responsible? Provide their
Full Name(s) and Job Title(s).
8. What are the Theory/Theories of Discrimination of the accepted claims?
9. What are the accepted Purviews/Bases?
10. What are the accepted issues/claims for this case?
11. Briefly summarize the Complainant’s version of what happened for the first claim only.
This should include all the pertinent details that should be present in an actual investigative summary report.
12. Briefly summarize the Management Official’s version of what happened for the first claim only. This should include all the pertinent details that would be present in an actual investigative summary report.
13. What was the non-discriminatory business-like reason for management’s action for the first claim?
14. Were any comparators named for the first claim by either the Complainant or the management official(s)? If so, list who they are, what their purviews/bases are and a brief description of how they compare to the Complainant regarding claim 1.
15. What Exhibits in the file are relevant to claim 1? Please list what the document is and describe what it reveals regarding the claim.
16. Briefly summarize the Complainant’s version of what happened for the second claim only. This should include all the pertinent details that would be present in an actual
17. Briefly summarize the Management Official’s version of what happened for the second claim only. This should include all the pertinent details that would be present in an actual
18. What non-discriminatory business-like reason did management provide for their action in the second claim?
19. Were any comparators named for the second claim by either the Complainant or the
Management Official(s)? If so, list who they are, what their purviews/bases are and a brief description of how they compare to the Complainant regarding claim 2.
20. What exhibits in the file are relevant claim 2? Please list what the document is and describe what it reveals regarding the claim.
21. What did Complainant request as a remedy?
| Answer 1: |
| Answer 2 a: |
| Answer 2 b: |
| Answer 3: |
| Answer 4 a: |
| Answer 4 b: |
| Answer 5: |
| Answer 6: |
| Answer 7: |
| Answer 8: |
| Answer 9: |
| Answer 10: |
| Answer 11: |
| Answer 12: |
| Answer 13: |
| Answer 14: |
| Answer 15: |
| Answer 16: |
| Answer 17: |
| Answer 18: |
| Answer 19: |
| Answer 20: |
| Answer 21: |
| Name: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .