Attachment_6_-_Project_Experience_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- REPLACE AND HARDEN CANA BOARDWALKS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140PS124R0009
About this file
This document is a Project Experience Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for the REPLACE AND HARDEN CANA BOARDWALKS project at Canaveral National Seashore. The questionnaire asks the offeror to provide information on referenced projects, including a description of the work performed, which project experience elements from the solicitation each contractor's work addresses, changes to original pricing and schedule, and how problems were resolved. The offeror is also asked to describe successful means and methods that could be implemented on the proposed project. The related federal contract opportunity is for the replacement of boardwalks at Canaveral National Seashore, with the Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region as the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140PS124R0009_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_9_-_Site_Visit_Roster_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_11_-_SOW_Addendum_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10_-_Q_A_Summary_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_12_-_Drawings_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_-_Q_A_Summary_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140PS124R0009_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_7_-_General_References_Form_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6_-_Site_Visit_Roster_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_5_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Sol_140PS124R0009.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_Construction_Wage_Decision_(FL2020232).pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140PS124R0009
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name and SAM UEI # |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .