Attachment 6 - Performance Evaluation Criteria.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12444323Q0045
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers - 12444323Q0045.docx | DOCX document | |
| Item1_MRDMasticationVicinity_2023.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers - 12444323Q0045.docx | DOCX document | |
| Item2_BRDMasticationVicinity_2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Schedule of Items UPDATED VERSION.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions and Answers 1 - 12444323Q0045.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - Maps 2.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - ContractSpecsMastication UPDATED.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 7 - Wage Determination 1981-0682.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Maps 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Schedule of Items UPDATED.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - Maps 3.pdf | ||
| Solicitaiton - 12444323Q0045 - Mastication Mt Laurel Marienville Ranger District.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION M--EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
RESPONSIBILITY CRITERIA
All employees working on this contract shall have the ability to identify trees and shrubs common to this area of Pennsylvania.
AWARD DETERMINATION
The Forest Service’s source evaluation will be based on best-value principles. Accordingly, award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal provides the greatest overall value to the Government, price and other factors considered. This best-value determination will be accomplished by comparing the value of the differences in the technical factors for competing offers, based on their strengths, weaknesses, and risks, with differences in their price to the Government. In making this comparison, the Government is more concerned with obtaining superior technical capabilities than with making an award at the lowest overall cost to the Government. However, the Government will not make an award at a significantly higher overall price to achieve slightly superior technical capabilities. As technical scores become closer, price will become more important. Technical Factors are equally important as price. Only Offerors that demonstrate acceptable submission to the Government of all items in Section L of this solicitation (or amendments thereof) will be considered for award.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS (In descending order of importance)
1. Past Performance and Past Experience on Similar Projects.
2. Capacity to Perform Work.
· Available Qualified Personnel
· Available Equipment
PAST PERFORMANCE & EXPERIENCE form List projects completed that are similar to the solicited requirements.
Title and Location of Project
Year Completed
Project Owner (agency or firm that work was done for)
Project Owner Point of Contact Name and Phone Number
Brief Description of Project and relevance to this contract. Indicate scope, size, cost, principle elements, special features, & whether you were the prime or sub on this project.
OFFEROR'S NAME:___________________________________________
DATE: ________________________________________________
PERSONNEL form List personnel assigned to the project.
NAME
POSITION
| YEARS OF EXPERIENCE |
| BACKGROUND/EXPERIENCE/SKILLS |
DATE: ________________________________________________
EQUIPMENT form List all equipment that will be used to complete the project requirements.
MAKE
| MODEL |
| YEAR |
| DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS |
DATE: ________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .