Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 329 KB Posted

Attached to
GOLDEN GATE NRA CAPEHART HOUSING ROOF REPLACEMENT
Solicitation number
140P8523R0012
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on Solicitation Number 140P8523R0012 from the National Park Service to replace rooftops at Capehart Housing in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. The past performance questionnaire requests information on up to five previous contracts including contract details, agency references, and ratings in quality, timeliness, and business relations. Bidders must complete Sections I and II and submit with their technical proposals. The solicitation seeks replacement of rooftops at Capehart Housing and does not specify pricing terms, response dates, or set asides.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP No. 140P8523R0012 Section J – Attachment No. 6

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(OFFEROR: COMPLETE SECTIONS I AND II AND SUBMIT WITH THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL)

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NO.:

CONTRACTOR ADDRESS: CONTRACT TYPE:

FIRM-FIXED-PRICE

COST REIMBURSEMENT

OTHER

ACTIVE COMPLETED

ROUTINE COMPLEX

DATES OF PERFORMANCE: AWARD AMOUNT $

TOTAL WITH MODS $

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

RFP No. 140P8523R0012 Section J – Attachment No. 6

II. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) IDENTIFICATION

AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:

POC NAME/TITLE/PHONE:

***Government Use Only – The following to be completed by Technical Evaluation Panel***

III. PAST PERFORMANCE RATING

Rating Scale: E = Excellent references are excellent in all respects G = Good references indicate good performance on past projects A = Acceptable references indicate acceptable performance on past projects M = Marginal references indicate marginal performance on past projects U = Unacceptable references indicate unacceptable performance on past projects N = Neutral no performance information was provided or available

1. QUALITY: (circle applicable rating)

a. Conformance with contract requirements E G A M U N

b. Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors) E G A M U N

c. General oversight by project manager and superintendent E G A M U N

d. Coordination with and control of subcontractors E G A M U N

e. Compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rate and labor usage requirements E G A M U N

f. Avoidance of accidents/safety violations E G A M U N

2. TIMELINESS:

a. Adherence to project delivery schedules E G A M U N

b. Submission of change proposals E G A M U N

c. Response to technical direction and change orders E G A M U N

d. Response to correction of identified problems E G A M U N

e. Submission of timely/accurate/complete billings E G A M U N

f. Submission of materials/other submittals E G A M U N

3. BUSINESS RELATIONS:

a. Flexibility and cooperativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N

b. Tenacity and innovativeness in resolving problems E G A M U N

c. Relationships with subcontractors, including prompt payment E G A M U N

d. End user was satisfied with services performed E G A M U N

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .