Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9124C22R0007
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for Engagement Skills Trainer II instructor/operator support services. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors bidding on the solicitation, which is seeking these services for Fort Jackson in South Carolina under a firm fixed-price contract from August 2022 to May 2027. The requirement will be set aside on a 100% competitive basis for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses. Respondents are asked to evaluate offerors on criteria including compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost controls, customer satisfaction and provide comments. The contracting office contacts are provided for questions regarding the solicitation, which will be posted on SAM.gov and notifications will not be sent directly to contractors.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - EST II PWS_8 Jul 22.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007-0001_EST II Support Svs_22020708.pdf | ||
| RFI Log_22R0007_EST II_20220708.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007_Conformed_EST II Support Svs_22020708.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - EST II PWS_6 May 22.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007__EST II Support Services_20220607.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5- Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - Sample Consent Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - WD 2015-4429 Rev 18_20211227.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - EST II QASP_20 Jan 22.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does [and/or notify the Contracting Officer]. Please return the completed Questionnaire to Richard J. Buelow II (Contract Specialist) at Richard.j.buelow.civ@army.mil and Cheryl M. Todd (Contracting Officer) at Cheryl.m.todd.civ@army.mil.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) A.
CONTRACT
IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B.
IDENTIFICATION
OF
OFFEROR’S
REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to
Specification
Requirements and
Standards of
Good
Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
C.
Timeliness of
Performance for
Services and
Product
Deliverables.
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this
Question on
Cost Reimbursement
Type Contracts
Only)
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its
Customers’
Interest
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
F.
General
Comments.
Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments:
G.
Other
Information
Sources.
Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): Telephone Number:
H.
Respondent
Identification.
Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .