Attachment 5- Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9124C22R0007
About this file
This document contains a template for offerors to provide past performance information on relevant contracts as part of a solicitation for Engagement Skills Trainer II (EST II) Instructor/Operator Support Services for the Army at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. The solicitation seeks a firm-fixed price contract for a base period of nine months and four one-year option periods to provide all labor, materials, and equipment for EST II instructor and operator support from August 2022 through May 2027. The requirement is set aside 100% for competitive award to a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business and has a North American Industry Classification System code of 541990 for all other professional, scientific, and technical services with a size standard of $16.5 million. Offerors must use the template to provide details of past contracts such as award dates, pricing, schedules, points of contact, and relevancy statements for evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - EST II PWS_8 Jul 22.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007-0001_EST II Support Svs_22020708.pdf | ||
| RFI Log_22R0007_EST II_20220708.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007_Conformed_EST II Support Svs_22020708.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - EST II PWS_6 May 22.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9124C22R0007__EST II Support Services_20220607.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 - Sample Consent Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - WD 2015-4429 Rev 18_20211227.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - EST II QASP_20 Jan 22.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5 Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet
The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
1. Contract Number, Award Date, and Contract type.
2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).
3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).
4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable).
Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.
8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.
9. Negative Performance Documentation. A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.
10. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule. The contractor shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary.
1. Contract Number
Award Date
Contract type_
2. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.
Original completion/delivery date
Revised completion/delivery date
3. Price/Cost – original awarded price_
4. Modified Price/Cost -
5. Completion Date or Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).
6. Changed Dates -
7. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:
8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).
Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:
9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).
Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:
10. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.
Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:
11. Relevancy Description.
12. Narrative explanation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .