Attachment 6 - Past Performance Information_PMOSS.docx

39 KB Posted

Attached to
J6 Program Management Office Support Services
Solicitation number
H9241526RE002
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This is a Past Performance Information (PPI) template for the J6 Program Management Office Support Services (PMOSS) RFP H92415-26-R-E002 issued by United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). Offerors must complete Part 1 of the form to identify relevant past performance citations, including contracting and technical points of contact, contract identification details, period of performance, security requirements, and total contract values. The form must be submitted as part of Volume III of the proposal and simultaneously sent to the identified government POCs and USSOCOM Contract POC Regina Farrell at regina.farrell@socom.mil by the proposal due date, with the email subject line indicating "J6 PMOSS RFP - PPI Submission for [Offeror Name]."

Part 2 of the form requires completion by the government POCs identified by the offeror and must be returned separately to USSOCOM. Evaluators assess contractor performance across nine criteria using a five-point rating scale (Excellent, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory), including compliance with SOW and specifications, schedule adherence, personnel recruitment and retention, security clearance onboarding, problem identification and resolution, working relationships, subcontractor management, technical expertise, and overall performance. Narrative comments are mandatory for Excellent or Unsatisfactory ratings. This PPI assessment directly supports USSOCOM's evaluation of offerors' demonstrated capability to provide IT program support, strategic planning, quality assurance, budget execution, and technical assessment services essential to J6 operations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 5 - Evaluation Procedures_Rev2.pdf PDF
H9241526RE002-0002_J6 PMOSS.pdf PDF
H9241526RE002-0001_J6 PMOSS.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Draft DD254_printable.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Proposal Submission Instructions_Rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Evaluation Procedures_Rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - PMOSS SOW_Rev1_20260616.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Price Matrix_J6 PMOSS_Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - Past Performance Information_PMOSS_Rev1.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 - QA_PMOSS_20260616.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - QA Template_PMOSS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Evaluation Procedures_PMOSS.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Proposal Submission Instructions_PMOSS.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Price Matrix_J6 PMOSS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - PMOSS SOW_20260605.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Draft DD254.pdf PDF
H9241526RE002_J6 PMOSS_20260605.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 6 - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (PPI)

In support of Request for Proposal (RFP) H92415-26-R-E002 for J6 Program Management Office Support Services (PMOSS)

OFFEROR NAME/CAGE/UEI: __________________________________

Introduction: Under the RFP, titled Information Technology Management, Strategic/Operational Planning, and Technical Support Services, United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. The contract resulting from this procurement will provide USSOCOM with IT program support, encompassing strategic planning, resource planning, quality assurance development/reporting, requirements document review, strategic resource planning support (POM submissions/Spend Plans), budget execution (funding document processing/invoice review), and technical and application assessment support. The completed PPI serves as a source of information to evaluate the Offerors recent and relevant performance of the submitted past performance citation as it relates to the RFP’s Statement of Work (SOW).

Instructions:

· Offeror – complete Part 1, Sections I.A. and I.B. and include as part of the Volume III – Past Performance proposal. Additionally, send the entire PPI to the Technical and Contracting POCs identified in Part 1, Section I.A. and also to the USSOCOM Contract POC listed below.

· POCs (listed in Part 1, Section IB) – complete Part 2, Sections II entirely, to include comments, then send the completed PPI to the USSOCOM Contract POC listed below. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information submitted. This is a critical acquisition being conducted by USSOCOM and your support is sincerely needed and appreciated. Narrative comments are appreciated and mandatory for EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY ratings. We thank you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire.

Return PPI via email to: Ms. Regina Farrell, regina.farrell@socom.mil by the due date established for receipt of the proposals. The e-mail “Subject” line shall clearly indicate: J6 PMOSS RFP - PPI Submission for [provide OFFEROR name here].

PART ONE – (to be completed by the Offeror)

Section I. OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE CITATION INFORMATION:

A.CONTRACTING POC – AGENCY & RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:
1
Name & Title:

(i.e. Contract Spec, COR, COTR, etc.)

2
Organization:
3
Address:
4
Phone No. (Commercial & DSN)
5
E-mail:

TECHNICAL POC – AGENCY & RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION:

1
Name & Title:

(i.e. Program Manager, COR, COTR, etc.)

2
Organization:
3
Address:
4
Phone No. (Commercial & DSN)
5
E-mail:

B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1
Offeror Name:
2
Contract Number and Order Number (If applicable):
3
Performed as Pime or Subcontractor:
4
Project Title and Service Description, to include relevance to J6 PMOSS requirements (Add rows if needed):
5
Type of Contract (i.e. Base with Option, IDIQ, etc.):
6
Pricing Type (i.e. Fixed Price, Time and Materials, Cost Reimbursable, other):
7
Competitive (Y/N):
8
Date of Award:
9
Total Estimated Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
10
Current Awarded/Obligated Contract Dollar Value to Date:
11
Final Subcontract Value (if applicable)
12
Period of Performance:
13
Place of Performance:

Identify all Place(s) of Performance

14
Number of Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) supporting this contract for each place of performance:
15
Security Requirements (i.e. Top Secret, TS/SCI, Secret, etc.):

PART TWO - (To be completed by the POCs from I.B. above)

Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):

RATING
DESCRIPTION
Excellent
The Offeror's past performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. REQUIRES A NARRATIVE
Very Good
The Offeror's past performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
The Offeror's past performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
The Offeror's past performance did not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. REQUIRES A NARRATIVE

Section II. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE How Would You Rate This Contractor With Respect To:

A. Compliance with the SOW and specifications; conformance to standards of good workmanship, and responsiveness to technical direction:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B. Adherence to the contract schedule and/or milestones:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

C. Contractor’s ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel with minimal gaps in service ( > 95% retention rate and/or no more than 21 day gap in service for unfilled billet):

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

D. Contractor’s ability to onboard contractor personnel in accordance with contract security requirements (i.e. obtaining security clearances, CACs, etc.):

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

E. Contractor’s ability to identify and resolve problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

F. Working relationship with Contracting Officer, COR, and other program personnel, to include other contractors:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

G. Contractor’s ability to effectively manage subcontractors and/or team members:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

H. Rate the level of technical expertise of the contractor’s staff:

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I. In summary, please give your overall assessment of this contractor’s performance.

Rating
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check

Comment:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please provide any additional comments regarding this contractor’s performance?

Performance Information provided by:

Name & Title:

Govt. Agency or Company:

E-Mail:

Phone: DSN: / Commercial:

Date:

CUI//PROCURE

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .