Attachment 6. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted Dec 4, 2020

Attached to: Logistics and Ammunition Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: N0040620R0023
Issued by: Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 28, 2023

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for logistics and ammunition support services. The Navy is soliciting proposals for a firm fixed price contract to provide warehouse support, logistics services, and ammunition handling and storage at Naval Base Kitsap in Bangor, Washington. The anticipated period of performance is a ten-month base with four one-year options and a six-month option period. This is a 100% small business set-aside that will use FAR parts 12 and 15 procedures. Proposals are due by the date specified in solicitation number N0040620R0023. The past performance questionnaire is a template for references to provide feedback on an offeror's performance on previous relevant contracts to assist with evaluation for this opportunity.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Logistics and Ammunition Support, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
N0040620R0023 Solicitation Amendment 3.pdf	PDF	Dec 29, 2020
N0040620R0023 Solicitation Amendment 2.pdf	PDF	Dec 21, 2020
N0040620R0023 Solicitation Amendment 1.pdf	PDF	Dec 14, 2020
Attachment 2. Wage Determination 2015-5526.pdf	PDF	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 3. DD Form 254.pdf	PDF	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 7. Staffing and Equipment Plan Worksheet TSSP - SWFPAC Logistics Contract.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 4. Visitor Group Security Agreement (VGSA).docx	DOCX document	Dec 4, 2020
N0040620R0023 Solicitation.pdf	PDF	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 8. Cost Summary Worksheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 1. Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) List.docx	DOCX document	Dec 4, 2020
Attachment 5. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET FOR PAST PERFORMANCE.docx	DOCX document	Dec 4, 2020

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

(Offeror to distribute to Customer listed on Contractor Performance Questionnaire for Past Performance Assessment)

(Page 1 of 4)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The contractor listed below is being considered for a contract award by FLC Puget Sound, Bremerton, WA. Your comments regarding this contractor’s past performance are appreciated.

This questionnaire must be received by the FLC Puget Sound Contracts Office no later than the due date of the Request For Proposal, which is:

PLEASE NOTE: Contractors may be advised of adverse remarks and given the opportunity to respond per the Federal Acquisition Regulation requirements. However, the contracting officer will not provide your name or questionnaire to the contractor. The results of the questionnaires are reserved strictly for the source selection. To maintain the integrity of the source selection process, we request that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your questionnaire comments with the contractor or any other individuals.

PROJECT TITLE: _________________________ – Solicitation ______________________

DATE OF EVALUATION:

PAST PROJECT INFORMATION:

Name and Address of Contractor/Offeror being Evaluated:

Contract Number, Project Title, and Location:

After completing the Past Performance Questionnaire, please forward it directly to:

FORWARD DIRECTLY TO THE FLC PUGET SOUND CONTRACTS OFFICE VIA EITHER:

1) E-MAIL

2) FAX

Email Address: ______________@navy.mil

Fax: 360-476-____

FLC PUGET SOUND

CONTRACTING OFFICE

INFORMATION

Commanding Officer Attn: Code _____

NAVSUP FLC PS

467 W Street Bremerton WA 98314-5100

(Page 2 of 4)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contract Type:

Original Contract Value:

Current Contract Value:

Period of Performance (including any options exercised)

Brief Scope of Work:

EVALUATOR (this information will be kept confidential):

Name:

Title/Position Held during the Project:

Activity/Location:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

QUESTIONNAIRE RATINGS

(Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings):

For questions 1 through 4, and sections III and VII a “yes”, “no” or “N/A” answer is sufficient. A brief explanatory comment, if appropriate, is appreciated. For questions in sections I through VI choose a number on the scale of 1 to 5, with 1 representing “unsatisfactory”, 2 representing “marginal”, 3 representing “satisfactory”, 4 representing “very good” and 5 representing “exceptional” performance. Circle the number that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance, or N/A for “not applicable”. Please add any comments and information (in the space provided on the last page) that may help to determine the Contractor’s probable future performance. Be sure to include the number of the item on which you comment.

QUESTIONS – Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following questions:

RATING:

Would you award similar contracts to the Contractor in the future?

Y N N/A

Were any tasks or deliverable items cancelled due to the Contractor’s inability to meet the work requirements or cost objective?

Y N N/A

Was the Contractor cooperative in negotiations and resolving issues?

Y N N/A

Have any instances of adverse actions such as the assessment of liquidated damages or issuance of Cure Notices, Show Cause Notices, and Delinquency Notices been issued?

Y N N/A

(Page 3 of 4)

QUESTIONS – Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following questions:

RATING:

Quality of Product or Service:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Compliance with contract/task order terms and conditions:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Adherence to accepted technical and professional standards:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Contractor Services required little or no rework:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Effectiveness of work control procedures:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Reports were accurate and complete:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Schedule

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Adherence to task schedules and/or milestones:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Timeliness of reports required by contract:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Timeliness of estimates:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Timeliness of invoices:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

III

Cost Control

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Contractor exceeded initially awarded contract or task order prices:

Y N N/A

2. Contractor keeps within total estimated costs (relationship between negotiated costs and actual costs):

Y N N/A

3. Accuracy and completeness of invoices:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Contractor labor and/or indirect costs have increased more than evaluated or expected:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Contractor submitted requests for equitable adjustment and/or claims under the contract or task order

Y N N/A

Management/Business Relations

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Contractor exhibits reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy):

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Overall performance in planning, scheduling and monitoring:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Ability to effectively manage multiple tasks from planning through execution:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification and corrective action plans:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Timeliness/Responsiveness to Government Requests:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Overall communication with the Government:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

(Page 4 of 4)

QUESTIONS – Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following questions:

RATING:

Personnel Resources

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1. Personnel assigned to key positions matched Contract/task key position qualification requirements:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. If key personnel were replaced, replacement’s qualifications met or exceeded requirements of the key position

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Overall Performance

1. How would you rate the contractor’s overall technical performance on this contract:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. How would you rate the contractor’s overall management performance on this contract:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

VII

Small Business Utilization. Answer the following questions:

1. Does this contract include a subcontracting plan?

Y N N/A

2. Is contractor meeting all subcontracting targets?

Y N N/A

Additional comments (this section provides space to comment on any of the answers in 1-4 and sections I-VII. Please put appropriate number next to comment. Any other comments are also welcome in this section): __________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 4, 2020.