Attachment 5 - RDIF Past Performance Questionnaire 20250626 -DRAFT.pdf

PDF 227 KB Posted

Attached to
USAF Rapid Development Integration Facility (RDIF) Supplies, Services, and Deliverables Sources Sought
Solicitation number
FA8629-26-R-B003
Issued by

About this file

The document is a draft Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 5) for the USAF Rapid Development Integration Facility (RDIF) Sources Sought pre-solicitation. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance information from contractors who have previously worked on similar projects, focusing on technical performance, customer satisfaction, and overall contract execution. It includes sections for evaluating contractor performance across multiple dimensions such as technical requirements, schedule effectiveness, manufacturing capabilities, and customer satisfaction, using a color-coded rating scale from Exceptional (Blue) to Unsatisfactory (Red).

The questionnaire seeks comprehensive insights into a contractor's past performance, including subcontractor management, contract variations, potential terminations, and overall work quality. It provides space for government points of contact to provide narrative comments on the contractor's most positive and negative aspects, as well as recommendations for future contract awards. This document is part of a pre-solicitation process for an upcoming Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the RDIF, which is an organic development capability within AFLCMC focused on rapid adaptive engineering solutions for urgent warfighter needs, specifically in aircraft modification and prototyping.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 5 – RDIF PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(Note: Offeror: Send directly to the points of contact for each contract submitted using Attachment 4 – RDIF Past Performance Information Tool. Contacts: Please answer and send directly to the Government Contracting Officer by email or regular mail)

Contracting Officer Info:

Primary: Chris Simendinger Alternate: Anaiya Taylor Building 46; Room 210 Building 46; Room 210 1895 5th St 1895 5th St Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433 Phone: (937) 713-0578 Phone: (937) 656-8086 Email: christoper.simendinger@us.af.mil Email: anaiya.taylor@us.af.mil

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104

BACKGROUND:

A. Government POC’s Name: __________________________________________________

B. Offeror Name (Company/Division):______________________________________________

C. Program Title: _______________________ Reference Number:_______________________

D. Department/Agency/Customer Name: _______________________________________________

E. What Entity Performed the Work Under This Contract

1. Company Name:__________________________________________________________

2. DUNS Number:__________________________________________________________

3. CAGE Code:_____________________________________________________________

F. Was the work performed by the vendor on this contract (check all that apply):

1. Related to aircraft modification/integration? ( ) Yes ( ) No

2. Related to the manufacture of aircraft components? ( ) Yes ( ) No

3. Related to the manufacture of aircraft cables? ( ) Yes ( ) No

4. Related to design/development of new aircraft systems/parts? ( ) Yes ( ) No

5. Related to prototyping of new aircraft systems/parts? ( ) Yes ( ) No

6. Performed at a Government-Owned-Government-Operated facility? ( ) Yes ( ) No

7. Performed at a Government-Owned-Contractor-Operated facility? ( ) Yes ( ) No

8. If none of the above are applicable, what type of work was performed? _____________

G. When was this work performed: ____________________________________________________

H. Is the project complete? ( ) Yes ( ) No

I. Was the contract terminated prior to the agreed upon period of performance? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, Explain:

J. Did a difference exist between initial contract cost and final contract cost? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain the cause of the difference:

K. Did this firm employ any subcontractor(s) to accomplished required work? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, was the subcontractor’s performance acceptable? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If No, explain why the subcontractor’s performance was not acceptable:

If subcontractors were used, did this firm effectively manage subcontractors? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If No, explain:

L. Have any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain:

M. Have any cure or show cause notices ever been issued? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If Yes, explain:

N. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option for this contractor? ( ) Yes ( ) No

O. Were there any claims or litigation? ( ) Yes ( ) No

EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. Provide comments and specific examples in the block below each item if rated above or below SATISFACTORY. This scale is defined as follows:

Performance Assessment Rating/Color

Description

EXCEPTIONAL (E)/BLUE

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered.

Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

VERY GOOD (VG)/PURPLE

During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

SATISFACTORY (S)/GREEN

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

MARGINAL (M)/YELLOW

During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented.

Customer involvement was required.

UNSATISFACTORY(U)/RED

During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

NOT APPLICABLE (N)/WHITE

Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

Technical Performance E VG S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the contract?

Comment:

T2. How effective was the contractor at meeting schedule and mitigating disruptions or unforeseen delays to the schedule?

T3. Overall, how effective was the contractor at manufacturing components?

Customer Satisfaction E VG S M U N/A

CS1. Overall, how satisfied was your organization with the work accomplished by this company?

YES NO

CS2. All other factors being equal, would you award this contractor another contract based on their performance?

NARRATIVE SUMMARY

N1. What were the contractor's most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

N2. What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

N3. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor's performance, as desired.

POC’s Name Contact info

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .