Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire_02.10.23.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DARPA Technical and Analytical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HR001123R0001
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HR001123R0001 Section M - Amend 01 tracked changes.docx | DOCX document | |
| HR001123R0001 Amend 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| HR001123R0001 Section L - Amend 01 tracked changes.docx | DOCX document | |
| HR001123R0001 Section G - Amend 01 tracked changes.docx | DOCX document | |
| HR001123R0001 Conform through Amend 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS_02.10.23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1A - Additional Requirements_02.10.23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - LH LCAT Pricing Spreadsheet_02.10.23.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HR001123R0001 (TASS IDIQ RFP).pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Technical Experience Referenced Contracts_02.10.23.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6 - Accounting System Checklist_02.10.23.rtf | RTF text file | |
| Attachment 2 - DARPA NDA_02.10.23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Solicitation Question Matrix_02.10.23.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 8 - Draft DD254_No POC Info_02.10.23.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HR0001123R0001 Past Performance Questionnaire DARPA Technical & Analytical Support Services
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
MEMORANDUM FOR: [Government Customer]
FROM: [Offeror]
SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for [Past Performance Information Submission Selection]
1. We are currently responding to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Technical and Analytical Support Services Request for Proposals (RFP) HR001123R0001 as a [prime contractor or subcontractor to Offeror]. This RFP specifically requires that we, as an Offeror, send a Past Performance Questionnaire to our identified points of contact (POCs) and track its completion and return.
2. We identified the subject contract/task order relevant to this acquisition and you as our POC. As such, please take a few moments to fill out the attached questionnaire and return it directly to the POC indicated below. The information in the completed questionnaire is considered source selection sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed back to the POC below.
3. Please email the completed questionnaire directly to the Government no later than 10:00 am Eastern on Monday, March 13, 2023, at:
DARPA Contracts Management Office Attention: Mary Beth Colavito, Contracting Officer TASSIDIQRequirement@darpa.mil
4. No classified information shall be submitted with this unclassified questionnaire.
Thank you for your timely assistance.
Sincerely, [Offeror POC]
Attachment:
Past Performance Questionnaire
Contact Information for the Individual Completing Survey
| Name: |
| Functional Responsibility: |
Customer Contracting Agency/Company:
| Email Address: |
| Phone: |
Mailing Address:
Dates of Involvement:
From:
To:
Contract Information
| Company/Division Being Rated: |
| Program Title: |
Contract Number:
Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type(s):
Date of Award and Period of Performance:
Did/Does this contract involve any classified work?
|_| No |_| Secret |_| Top Secret |_| SCI
|_|Other (i.e., SAP)
Original Contract Value and Current Contract Value (provide explanation for differences):
Original Completion Date and Current Completion Date (provide explanation for differences):
Brief Description of Work Including Complexity of Work:
|_| Complete |_| Ongoing
Fee Structure and Award Fee History (Provide amount awarded versus amount available for award, with explanation for differences and award fee policy):
Summary of Major Achievements, Successes, Innovations, and Awards Accomplished During Contract Performance:
Signature:
Date:
Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Your answers to these questions will help the Government evaluate how well the contractor performed under your contract. Please check the appropriate rating, and we strongly encourage you to provide thorough and concise comments for all responses other than those rated Satisfactory or N/A. A separate sheet may be used if necessary. Thank you in advance for your participation.
Please use the following scale to respond to each question below:
| Unacceptable |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| Indicates the contractor is deficient and demonstrates very little understanding and ability to perform the goals/objectives of the contract. Such deficiencies are expected to be very difficult or impossible to correct. |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements; however, the area of evaluation experienced serious problems that were difficult to correct. Corrective action was either not identified, appeared only marginally effective, or was not fully implemented. |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. The area of evaluation experienced some minor problems for which: either: 1) corrective action was taken and appeared to be satisfactory; or 2) corrective action was identified that would probably correct the problems. |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds some. The contractor is fulfilling the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. The area of evaluation may have experienced a few minor problems for which timely corrective action was taken and was effective. |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance exceeds all contractual requirements and the goals/objectives of the SOW/PWS. The area of evaluation may have experienced a few minor problems for which timely corrective action was taken and was effective. |
Quality of Technical Performance:
(1) How well did the Contractor do in meeting technical performance requirements and providing complete, accurate, and timely products or services?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
Comments:
(2) Did the Contractor staff regularly display critical thinking and problem-solving skills and provide the Government with proposed solutions to complex problems?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(3) Did the Contractor work in a diverse and/or hybrid environment to include subcontractors, other Government support contractors, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), customers, and Government personnel to create a “one team” environment?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(4) Did the Contractor accomplish its incoming and outgoing contract transitions well? Did the Contractor ensure that changeovers were seamless, transparent, and timely with minimal impact to the Government?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(5) Did the Contractor meet all the personnel security requirements on the contract (specifically, please address pre-screening, clearance processing, training, and any unique contract security requirements)?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
Quality of Management Performance:
(6) How would you assess the Contractor’s ability to manage contract staffing, onboarding, cost, schedule, performance, and risk and their ability to communicate this information effectively to the Government? Please provide details and rate how well they did.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(7) Were cost or schedule problems encountered with the Contractor’s performance, and how effective was the Contractor at solving the problems and taking corrective action to reduce the risk of recurrence? Please provide details and rate how well they did.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(8) Was the Contractor’s corporate reach back able to provide effective support for on-site personnel and willing to assist with contract management if there were performance issues? Did the Government have to step in to assist in contract management to ensure successful performance? Please provide details and rate how well they did.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
(9) Did the Contractor attain its small business participation goals on the contract, if applicable? Please provide details and rate how well they did.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
Overall:
(10) How well did the Contractor meet your overall expectations with regard to their performance in meeting the objectives and requirements of the contract?
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
| N/A |
Thank you for completing this questionnaire.
Your time and candor are greatly appreciated.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .