Attachment 5- OPPD Offerors Past Performance Data.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00244-25-R-S015
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Data form for a Naval Supply Systems Command solicitation (N00024-24-R-0043). The form is designed for collecting detailed performance evaluations of contractors, focusing on four key quality assessment areas: contract requirements fulfillment, timeliness, responsiveness, and overall contractor performance. The form requires comprehensive feedback from previous clients, including assessments of customer satisfaction, problem resolution, cost control, schedule compliance, and willingness to recommend the contractor for future work. The form is specifically related to a Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Maintenance Services solicitation for Naval Base Ventura County, seeking preventive and corrective maintenance services for government-owned equipment, with a NAICS code of 811310 for commercial and industrial machinery maintenance.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4- QASP Material Handling Equipment.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-S015- SOL.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Material Handling Equipment PM Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3-Price Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6- WD 2015-5625 Rev. 24 VENTURA.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- PWS MHE Maintenance.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2.1- Material Handling Equipment PM Schedule.pdf | ||
| CDRL Technical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary.pdf | ||
| CDRL Technical Exhibit 2 Schedule of Deliverables.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00024-24-R-0043
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Patricia Castillo Phone: (619) 556-5523 Email: patricia.castillo26.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .