Attachment 5. Past Performance.pdf

Controlled Unclassified Information

Attachment 5: Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 1 of 3

The Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3) of the Air Force is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a DC3 SETA Support program. The Contractor shall interface and perform technical and programmatic liaison support across DC3 and its partner agencies. The Contractor shall provide technical analyses for trade studies and capability assessments, as well as evaluation tools and support to field demonstrations.

Additional tasks involve tracking and documenting performance, conducting vendor market surveys, and developing supportability technical data and training. Furthermore, support will be provided for planning and implementing new capabilities to meet evolving mission requirements.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. We request your written response no later than (8 May 2026 10:00 A.M. EST.).

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to cole.santee@us.af.mil and joycelyn.roux@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the offeror’s official proposal.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 2 of 3

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 3 of 3

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 4: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date