Attachment 5 Construction Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Z1DA--603-24-902 Asbestos Abatement Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24924R0023
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 9

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on an asbestos abatement project at the Louisville VA Medical Center. The solicitation number is 36C24924R0023 and seeks asbestos abatement services. The contracting agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 9. Section A is for a contractor to provide contact information and authorize the release of past performance information to the contracting office. Section B is a questionnaire for assessors to rate a contractor's past performance on quality, schedule, and business relations using an acceptable/unacceptable scale. Assessors are asked to provide rationales for ratings and indicate if they would award another contract to the contractor. They must also provide their role and period of involvement. Responses are due by January 8, 2024.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 603-24-902, Asbestos Abatement at the Louisville VA Medical Center, Robley Rex VAMC Campus in Louisville, Kentucky.

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Asbestos Abatement at the Louisville VA Medical Center, Robley Rex VAMC Campus.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist, Jen Jamieson by way of email at jen.jamieson@va.gov.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than January 8, 2024, at 1:00pm Central Standard Time. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (jen.jamieson@va.gov).

Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number

Project/Requirement

Customer/Agency

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Contractor Point of Contact:

3. Phone number (with area code):

4. Assessor Contract Award number:__
5. Description of Services provided under contract:__
6. Contract award date:Contract Amount: InitialFinal

7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date:

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)

RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating
Description
ACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance

record is unknown. (See note below.)

UNACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

3. Delivery of service was within required time specified by contract requirements.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

BUSINESS RELATIONS

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.

Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.

Would not award another contract to this contractor.

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

SECTION C: General Comments

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)

(Phone Number)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .