Attachment 5 1202SC24Q2712 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for 1202SC24Q2712 for Salt Fog Prohesion Spray Testing, US Forest Service, Logistics Contracting Branch.

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The USFS, Incident Procurement Operations (IPO), Logistics Contracting Branch, Boise, ID, has issued a solicitation for a Purchase Order (PO) for the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) located in Boise, ID.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to the PPS, IPO and NIFC.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contract Specialist listed below. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than June 3, 2024 by 5:00PM Central Time. Assessor is requested to send electronically to matthew.cox2@usda.gov.

*Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

mailto:matthew.cox2@usda.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number 1202SC24Q2712 Requisition Salt Fog Prohesion Spray Testing Agency/Customer USFS/National Interagency Fire Center

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s______________________________________ Name and Address: ______________________________________

2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________

3. Phone number (with area code):__________________________________________

4. Assessor Contract Award number: ________________________________________

5. Description of Services provided under contract:

6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____

7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to USFS/National Interagency Fire Center, Contracting Office, Boise, Idaho.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).

RATING SCALE Definitions

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. A U

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of goods/services. A U

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

1. Delivery was within required time period specified by contract requirements. A U

2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.

Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? A U

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolving any problems, etc.) A U

2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). A U

3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. A U

4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. A U

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. A U

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.

______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

Acceptable Unacceptable

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)

(Phone Number) (Organization)

Assessor Name