Attachment 4 PPQ.pdf
PDF 152 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fire Suppression Systems Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-20-Q-0031
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 6 EMS Awareness.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Clauses and Provisions.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 PMP-QCP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Pricing Schedule.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5
FA5613-20-Q-0031
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for the Operational Tests, Maintenance and Repair of Fire Suppression System at the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC), comprising Ramstein Air Base, Construction and Training Squadron (CTS), Vogelweh, Einsiedlerhof, Bann and Kapaun Air Station and Kaiserslautern-Vogelweh area.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address: ____________________
Point of Contact: ____________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*: Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater: __________________________________________
Title: __________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________
Phone Number: __________________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________________
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Venice Pamparo & Claudia Ledig James Hanley, 1st Lt.
Contracting Specialists Contracting Officer 700 CONS/PKA and 700 CONS/PKA Venice.pamparo.1@us.af.mil james.hanley.4@us.af.mil claudia.ledig.de@us.af.mil +49-631-536-2120or DSN 489-2120
+49-631-536-6870, DSN 489-6870
+49-631-536-0014, DSN 489-0014
mailto:claudia.ledig.de@us.af.mil
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).
A U Acceptable Unacceptable
Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown
Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: Acceptable Unacceptable
1. Accomplished service IAW National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) 17A, Standard for WET Chemical Extinguishing Systems Chapter7, Standard German commercial practices and local state, or federal applicable standards and codes, Verband Deutscher Sachversicherer (VDS) / German Insurers` Association guidelines, manufacturer recommendations and all required safety regulations from the German Social Accident Insurance / Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherungen (DGUV).
2. Performed repair service within the established turnaround times.
3. Responded to/completed service calls (routine, emergency, urgent service calls) within the time sets forth in the contract.
4. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance.
5. Provided adequately trained personnel.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy.
8. Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions.
9. Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.
10. Provided timely and courteous service to guests.
11. Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable).
12. Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules.
13. Contractor adequately coped with short notice requirements.
14. Complied with environmental requirements.
15. How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .