Attachment 4 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Nellis AFB Grounds Maintenance Service Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- F3G3CE0154AW01
About this file
This combined synopsis and solicitation requests proposals for grounds maintenance services at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. The contractor shall provide all management, tools, equipment and labor necessary to perform custodial services and maintain facilities in a clean, neat and professional manner in accordance with the performance work statement. The period of performance is from November 2020 to November 2025, including a one-year base period and four one-year options. Proposals are due by October 16, 2020, with award anticipated to take place thereafter. This is an 8(a) set-aside being conducted by the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command. Any questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted by October 7.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sheet B Fence Area 13oct2020.pdf | ||
| Revised Combo Synopsis Solicitation Ground Maintenance.doc | DOC document | |
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sheet C Weed Control Irrigation With Rock Beds.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Grounds Maintenance PWS 6 August 2020 REVISED.pdf | ||
| Sheet A Contract Grounds Map updated.pdf | ||
| Sheet B Fence Area.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Wage Determination 2015-5593 (Rev13).pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Grounds MX Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Grounds Maintenance PWS 6 August 2020.pdf | ||
| Combo Synopsis Solicitation Ground Maintenance.doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
F3G3CE00154AW01
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Corporation being evaluated:
Past Performance under Contract/Project Number:
This past performance questionnaire will be used to evaluate the above corporation in its offer to the USAF for 99 CES Grounds Maintenance Contract. Please complete the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
1. Did the company in question perform as the prime contractor or subcontractor?
[ ] Prime [ ] Subcontractor If subcontractor, please describe the frequency/type of interaction you held with company:
2. Description of services/product provided (if subcontractor, please describe only their specific role in the project):
3. Contract Value (if subcontractor, please only indicate amount actually performed by sub):
4. Period of Performance (if subcontractor, please indicate POP of sub’s portion of project): From:
INSTRUCTIONS – After commenting, please score in column on the right using the rating scale defined below:
PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS
| Rating |
| Description |
SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE
(5) Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE
(4) Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
LIMITED CONFIDENCE
(3) Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
NO CONFIDENCE
(2) Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE
(1) No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
1. Address the contractor’s ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel. Please specifically address turnover.
Rating
2. Address the contractor’s overall technical performance on this task order.
Rating
3. Address the contractor’s overall management performance on this task order.
Rating
4. Address the contractor’s compliance with and ability to maintain performance standards.
Rating
5. Address the effectiveness of the contractor’s quality control systems.
Rating
6. Address the contractor’s proactive resolution of quality issues.
Rating
7. Address your experience with the contractor’s invoicing practices (problems? overbilling? Inaccuracies?)
Rating
8. RESERVED
Rating
9. Rate the contractor’s overall performance.
Rating
10. Do you know of any other source that has knowledge of this contractor’s performance on similar work?
Name/Company:
Telephone No.:
Evaluator’s Name/Organization:
| Signature and Date: |
| Phone/e-mail address: |
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
ATTN: Eloisa Salvatera
99 CONS/PKB
Nellis AFB, NV 89191 E-mail: eloisa.salvatera@us.af.mil
ATTN: Julia A. Pettit
99 CONS/PKB
Nellis AFB, NV 89191 E-mail: julia.pettit@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .