Attachment 4 PPQ and Cover Letter 17 Dec 2020.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Maintenance and Repair contract at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact 1st Lt Grimes at bailey.grimes.1@us.af.mil and Mr. Chad LaValley at chad.lavalley.1@us.af.mil.

JOSHUA WOLERY, GS-14, DAFC

Contracting Officer

1 Atch

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire mailto:bailey.grimes.1@us.af.mil mailto:chad.lavalley.1@us.af.mil

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:

Address:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: *

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount: *

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: * Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: 1st Lt Grimes at bailey.grimes.1@us.af.mil and Mr. Chad LaValley at chad.lavalley.1@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance Performance Performance Performance Performance does Performance meets/met meets/met meets/met does not not meet/did not was not contractual contractual contractual meet/did not meet most observed or requirements requirements with requirements. The meet some contractual not with many some exceeded to contractual contractual requirements and applicable to exceeded to the the Government’s performance of the requirements. recovery is not the current Government’s benefit. The element or sub- The contractual likely in a timely effort being benefit. The contractual element contains performance of manner. The reported contractual performance of the some minor the element or contractual against.

performance of element or sub- problems for which sub-element performance of the the element or element being corrective actions being assessed element or sub-sub-element assessed was taken by the reflects a element contains a being assessed accomplished with contractor were serious problem serious problem(s) was no more than some satisfactory. for which the for which the accomplished minor problems for contractor has contractor’s with no more which corrective not yet corrective actions than a few minor actions taken by identified appear or were problems for the contractor were corrective ineffective.

which corrective effective. actions or the actions taken by contractor’s the contractor proposed were highly actions appear effective. only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

mailto:bailey.grimes.1@us.af.mil mailto:chad.lavalley.1@us.af.mil

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

The contractor: E G S M U N

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Remarks: