Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

PDF 152 KB Posted

Attached to
Airfield Management - Keesler AFB Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA301022R0033
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This request for proposal solicits offers for airfield management services at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. The period of performance is expected to be from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023 with three optional one-year extensions, not to exceed 54 months total. The acquisition is set aside 100% for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management and proposals are due by September 8, 2022. The applicable NAICS code is 488119 for other airport operations with a $35 million size standard. The government will award a firm-fixed price contract and anticipates site visits. Questions are due by August 29, 2022 and will be answered via SAM.gov.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Airfield Management - Keesler AFB Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - PWS dated 1SEP22.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - PWS Attch 2 - Work Area Layout.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - FA301022R0033 Q and As.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Site Visit Sign-in Sheet.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Keesler Current CBA dated 23 Aug 21_Redacted.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - PWS - 25JULY2022.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA301022R0033.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Past Performance List of References.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - GFE.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4

FA3010-22-R-0033

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contract Name and/or Number (include task order number(s) if applicable) Company/Division Name to be evaluated

Address:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone Number:

Email

Contractor performed as: Prime contractor Contractor performed as: Sub-Contractor Joint Venture Affiliate To/With _____________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: Please complete.

Contracting Activity/Customer

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Keesler AFB is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:

Airfield Management Services

In order for the 81st Contracting Squadron to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and e-mail a PDF file to brooke.geigenmiller@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist, and aaron.pearson@us.af.mil, Contracting Officer at 81 CONS, Keesler AFB. The due date for completed questionnaires is 08 September 2022 at 12:00 PM CST. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. To be considered, the Past Performance Questionnaire shall be returned to the Contract Specialist in its entirety and by the due date and time specified above.

To confirm receipt of your completed/submitted questionnaires please contact Contract Specialist, Brooke Geigenmiller, by e-mail at brooke.geigenmiller@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please complete.

Contract Name and/or Number

Task Order number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Performance Period for the task order:

Annual Contract Values:

Total Contract Dollar Value: (base plus any options) Contract Description:

Contractor performed as: Prime contractor Contractor performed as: Sub-Contractor Joint Venture Affiliate To/With _____________________

What percentage of the contract was performed by the evaluated contractor, if available: ………………...%.

Instructions:

Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings.

RATING DEFINITION

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

N/A Not Applicable

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

A. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND PERFORMANCE

(1) The Contractor provided quality service that adhered to contract requirements and specifications.

(2) The Contractor consistently responded to problems and took appropriate action to correct performance.

(3) The Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

(4) The Contractor adhered to applicable security requirements.

(5) Contractor ensured all equipment met standards for maintenance, usability, and general upkeep.

B. MANAGEMENT

(1) Contractor was able to resolve customer complaints quickly and effectively.

(2) Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort.

(3) Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive and effective solutions to critical contract issues.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(4) Contractor effectively managed subcontractors.

(5) Contractor validated all required qualifications and training for all employees.

C. TIMELINESS/SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE/SERVICES

(1) Contractor completed major contract tasks on schedule.

(2) Contractor corrected deficiencies in timely manner.

(3) Contractor submitted timely, accurate, and complete reports and submissions.

(4) Contractor reported all airfield violations promptly.

D. OTHER:

(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If you answered “No” provide an explanation. ____________________________________________________

(2) Was the contract terminated for default or cause? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation.___________________________________________________

(3) Has the Contractor been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments in the last 3 years. ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation and how many actions and if they were resolved:

(4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

RESPONDENT SIGNATURE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .