Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 132 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Management Capacity Study
- Solicitation number
- AOCACB26R0052
- Issued by
-
Architect of the Capitol
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template issued by The Architect of the Capitol (AOC) for use in evaluating contractor performance under Solicitation #AOCACB26R0052 for a Management Capacity Study. The questionnaire is designed to be completed by previous clients or users of a contractor being considered for award and must be returned directly to AOC Contracting Officer Michael Hoover at michael.hoover@aoc.gov on or before the proposal submission due date specified in Block 9 of the SF 33 form.
The questionnaire requests evaluation of contractor performance across 16 specific areas using a four-tier rating scale: Outstanding (O), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), and Unsatisfactory (U). Evaluation categories include schedule performance and problem resolution, quality control, work quality, pricing reasonableness, labor and safety standard compliance, corrective actions or notices issued, contract modification activity, customer satisfaction, contractor-client relationship quality, on-site management and subcontractor coordination, corporate management and integrity, and likelihood of recommending future contracts. Respondents must provide supporting narrative details for outstanding or unsatisfactory ratings and may include additional comments. The document emphasizes that responses are source selection sensitive information protected under Federal Acquisition Regulation 42.1503 and are restricted to government personnel involved in source selection evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 Section L.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Section M.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Statement of Work_9.23.2026.pdf | ||
| AOCACB26R0052 Mgmt Cap Study.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
For use by The Architect of the Capitol
Solicitation # AOCACB26R0052 Management Capacity Study
The company/individual listed below is preparing an offer on the above project for an agency in the federal government - the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) in Washington, DC. Your name/firm has been selected as a previous user of the below listed company with information on its past performance under a contract awarded by you/your firm. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive, therefore, please be advised that your response to this Past Performance Questionnaire will be safeguarded to the extent cited in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.1503. The FAR prohibits in part the release of past performance evaluations to other than other Government personnel used to evaluate source selection sensitive information.
This past performance questionnaire is being submitted to you/your firm by the company listed below, however, you are requested complete it and return it directly to AOC as follows. Please provide your responses to the AOC Contracting Officer of record, Michael Hoover, and send your response to this questionnaire to michael.hoover@aoc.gov on or before the proposal submission due date listed in Block 9. of the SF 33. While all elements in this questionnaire may not apply, please complete as much as possible.
Company/Individual Requesting Past Performance Information:
Name:
Past Project Title on Which the Company/Individual Is Being Evaluated
Project Title:
Name/Firm information: Point of Contact (POC) - for verification purposes
Name: Date:
Name for Point of Contact (for verification purposes):
Phone No.: Fax No.
E-mail Address:
Address:
Position held or function in relation to project:
Ratings: Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:
“O” Outstanding The contractor’s performance clearly exceeded the contract requirements.
“S” Satisfactory The contractor’s performance met the contract requirements.
“M” Marginal The contractor’s performance met the minimum contract requirements but with difficulty.
“U” Unsatisfactory The contractor’s performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.
Please rate and provide supporting information for the following. If the rating is Outstanding or Unsatisfactory, please provide specific contract/job performance areas which were exceeded or not performed in accordance with the contract’s minimum requirements. (Use additional sheets as needed) mailto:michael.hoover@aoc.gov
Solicitation # AOCACB26R0052 Management Capacity Study
1. Performance in meeting delivery/completion schedules:
Rating:
2. What did the contractor do to improve or resolve schedule problems, if experienced?
3. How was the contractor’s quality control?
4. The contractor’s performance in delivering quality work in accordance with the contract:
5. The contractor’s ability to provide the required work at a reasonable total price:
6. Did the contractor comply with labor standards, if applicable?
7. Did the contractor comply with safety standards?
Solicitation # AOCACB26R0052
8. Was the contractor issued any of the following: Cure notice, show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
9. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please state reasons:
10. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?
11. How was the relationship between the contractor and owner’s contract team/Contracting Officer/COR/COTR?
12. How was the contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors?
13. How was the contractor’s overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct?
Solicitation # AOCACB26R0052
14. Did the contractor file any modifications? How many and to what extent?
15. Has the contractor been provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
16. OVERALL RATING:
17. Please provide any additional comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .