Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA442725Q1128
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for an HVAC Water Treatment Services contract at Travis Air Force Base. The solicitation is seeking quotes from companies capable of providing HVAC water loop treatment services, with a questionnaire submission deadline of 20 September 2025 at 1200 Pacific Standard Time. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor performance across multiple dimensions, including service quality, problem responsiveness, personnel recruitment and retention, management effectiveness, and overall contract performance. Key evaluation criteria focus on the contractor's ability to maintain certified HVAC and water treatment personnel, demonstrate flexible solutions, correct deficiencies promptly, and provide consistent, high-quality service. The questionnaire allows the government to assess past performance confidence levels ranging from "No Confidence" to "Substantial Confidence" based on the contractor's historical performance metrics.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Travis AFB is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:
HVAC Water Treatment Services In order for 60th Contracting Squadron to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and email a PDF file to: brandon.spratt.2@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist, at 60 CONS, Travis AFB. The due date for completed questionnaires is 20 September 2025 at 1200 Pacific Standard Time. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official source selection records. To be considered, the Past Performance Questionnaire shall be returned to the Contract Specialist in its entirety and by the due date and time specified above.
To confirm receipt of your completed/submitted questionnaires, please contact:
Contract Specialist: Brandon Spratt by email at brandon.spratt.2@us.af.mil.
Contracting Officer: Lt Phillip Manwaring by email at phillip.manwaring@us.af.mil
A. OFFEROR’s REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contract Name and/or Number (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Company (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Address:
POC of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone Number:
Email:
| Contractor performed as: | |
| Prime Contractor | Sub-Contractor |
Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: Please complete
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contract (POC) Title of POC:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please Complete.
Contract Name and/or Number
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period (Base plus any options)
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value: (base plus options)
Contract Description (List out Equipment Manufacture and Model#s
| Contractor performed as: |
| Prime Contractor: |
Sub-Contractor:
If Sub-Contractor: What percentage was performed by the evaluated Contractor
A. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and
5) that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Neutral Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to |
successfully perform the required effort.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| THE CONTRACTOR |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| The Contractor provided quality service that showed relevance/adherence to the contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| The Contractor consistently responded to problems and took appropriate action to correct performance. |
| 3 |
| Did the contract involve hard to fill positions (specialty positions) or positions in high cost of living areas? If so, did the Contractor successfully recruit and retain state certified HVAC and Assoc. of Water Technologies personnel with minimal disruption? |
| 4 |
| Contractor corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their contract requirements. |
| 5 |
| Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort. |
| 6 |
| Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive and effective solutions to critical contract issues. |
| 7 |
| Contractor demonstrated ability to plan for and provide replacement candidates during the life of the contract to include preplanned absences, unplanned illnesses, or an extended leave of absence. |
| 8 |
| Contractor consistently demonstrated an ability to recruit and retain certified HVAC and Association of Water Technologies personnel in accordance with the contract requirements to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule. |
| 9 |
| Contractor ensured personnel were properly credentialed (to include Association of Water Technologies) and certified to the industry standard. |
| 10 |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? |
| 11 |
| Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| Yes |
| No |
Additional Remarks
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .