Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JJDP Act Core Requirements Audit Support
- Solicitation number
- 15PJDP25Q00000001
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDP Act) Core Requirements Audit Support contract. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous contractors or clients, with ratings across ten performance categories including service quality, technical report accuracy, problem resolution, personnel skills, workload management, communication, and overall responsiveness. Ratings are scored using a six-point scale from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U), with the completed form to be submitted to Jamila Garrett, the contract specialist, at Jamila.Garrett@usdoj.gov.
The associated federal contract opportunity (Solicitation Number: 15PJDP25Q00000001) seeks a contractor to support OJJDP in its compliance determination and auditing requirements under the JJDP Act. Specific services include collecting and analyzing core requirements data from U.S. states, territories, and the District of Columbia, and conducting audits of JJDPA core requirements compliance monitoring systems. The contractor will work under the oversight of OJJDP subject matter expert staff, coordinating to implement statutorily mandated activities related to juvenile justice compliance.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Office Of Juvenile Justice And Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDP Act) Core Requirements Audit Support
INSTRUCTIONS:
The Contractor who has provided you with this form is proposing to submit a quotation to the Department of Justice/Office of Justice Programs (DOJ/OJP) solicitation for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) requirement for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) Core Requirements Audit Support. Past performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is extremely important. The questionnaire shall be filled out and e-mailed to Jamila.Garrett@usdoj.gov. This information will not be disclosed to the Contractor. If you have any questions, please contact Jamila A. Garrett, Contract Specialist at Jamila.Garrett@usdoj.gov If the contractor this past performance questionnaire is for was a subcontractor on the project, please list the name of the prime contractor here: __________________________________________ Company Name & Address:
| Contract Number: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Contract Value: |
| Complexity: |_| Routine |_| Moderate |_| Difficult |
| Contract Role: |
| |_| Prime |_| Subcontractor |_| Team Member |
Description of the Work Performed Under the Contract (Please be specific about tasks performed.)
Performance Survey: Please indicate how the contractor performed in each area assessed.
No.
Performance Questions Ratings Codes: E=Exceptional; VG=Very Good; S=Satisfactory; M=Marginal; U=Unacceptable;
N/A=Not Applicable (see page 3 for definitions)
| Mark an “X” in the box for the most appropriate Ratings Code for each Performance Question. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| If applicable, how did the contractor perform during a transition of task from another firm? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| General quality of services and support provided during the period of performance? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. |
| Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4.a. |
| Contractor’s ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4.b. |
| Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 5. |
| Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key personnel vacancies in a timely manner? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 6. |
| Ability to handle fluctuating workloads? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 7. |
| Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with Government employees? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 8. |
| Overall Responsiveness to Government requests? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 9. |
| If performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 10. |
| Overall Contract Performance Rating? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Additional Comments About Contract Performance:
Definitions:
i. Exceptional (E): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
ii. Very Good (VG): Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
iii. Satisfactory (S): Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
iv. Marginal (M): Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.
v. Unsatisfactory (U): Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action appear or were ineffective.
vi. Not Applicable (N/A): Does not apply to the acquisition.
Rater Information
Name:
Job Title/Position:
Agency/Company Name:
| Phone: |
| Email: |
Signature:
PLEASE RETURN ALL PAGES OF THE PPQ TO THE CONTRACT SPECIALIST AT:
Jamila.Garrett@usdoj.gov image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .