Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire 08152025.docx
DOCX document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Office of Small Business Programs Support Services - Amend 7 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT001125RE003
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Defense Health Agency (DHA) Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) Support Services contract. The solicitation (HT001125RE003) seeks a firm fixed-price contract to provide comprehensive operational and management support services at the DHA Headquarters in Falls Church, VA. The contract will have one 12-month base period and four 12-month option periods, with an estimated award during Q1 FY26.
The solicitation requires support for various business, technical, analytical, and administrative functions to comply with Department of Defense Directive Instruction 4205.01 and the Small Business Act. Proposal evaluation will be based on best value, considering technical, past performance, and price factors. Contractors must be prepared to attend meetings and support on-site requirements in the National Capitol Region. Pre-proposal inquiries are accepted until September 1, 2025, at 4 PM Eastern Time, with proposals to be submitted via email to Contracting Officer Vicki L. Whiteman and Contract Specialist Mary Anne Young.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you this form is proposing on a Defense Health Agency Support Services contract for their Office of Small Business Programs. Past performance is an important evaluation criterion for the acquisition, so input from previous customers of the offeror is very important. We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Note: Offerors may be debriefed on performance evaluation information obtained from references. However, the names of the individual(s) providing information will not be disclosed.
Please provide your assessment and return the completed form (or equivalent) directly to the Defense Health Agency Contracting Officer in time for evaluation beginning on or before September 1, 2025.
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL PLEASE CONVERT THE DOCUMENT TO ADOBE PDF COMPLIANT VERSION WITH SIGNATURES.
Vicki L. Whiteman Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity Professional Services Contracting Division 7700 Arlington Blvd.
Falls Church VA 22042 E-Mail: vicki.l.whiteman.civ@health.mil Copy to Contract Specialist Mary Anne Young: mary.a.young138.ctr@health.mil Subject: “Solicitation HT001125RE003–PP Questionnaire”
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
3. CONTRACT NUMBER: 2a. EVALUATOR
| 4. ANNUAL CONTRACT VALUE (Check One): | NAME: | ||||
| <$1M; | $1-10M; | $10-20M; | $>$20M | TITLE: |
PHONE NO:
5. CONTRACT OR ORDER AWARD DATE: 6. CONTRACT OR ORDER COMPLETION DATE
(Include Extensions):
| / | / | / | / | |
| 7. CONTRACT TYPE (Check All That Apply): | 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK |
(Check One Response):
| Firm-Fixed Price | |||
| Cost-Plus/Fixed Fee | Difficult | Routine | Both |
| Cost Plus Adjustable Fee | |||
| Labor Hour/Time-and-Materials Other: Specify: |
Attachment 4 - PP Questionnaire
HT001125RE003
ATTACHMENT 4 -Past Performance Questionnaire
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
8. a. Primary Contractor Subcontractor
9. INDICATE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF SERVICES 10. NUMBER OF USERS
/LOCATIONS SERVICED
Local; Nationwide; Worldwide BY THIS CONTRACT:
· TYPE AND EXTENT OF SUBCONTRACTING SUPPORT (Complete this item only if subcontracting support was used by the offeror):
· BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING
Please rate the offeror’s performance in each of the evaluation factors/subfactors listed on the following pages. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this offeror and indicate your assessment by placing any “X” under the appropriate heading.
Evaluation factors include:
a. QUALITY OF SERVICES
b. OFFEROR PERSONNEL
c. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
d. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Adjectival ratings are defined as follows:
EXCELLENT = Offeror performance exceeded customer expectations or contract requirements, and routinely provided significant or worthwhile features or benefits.
| SATISFACTORY = | Offeror performance met customer expectations or contract requirements (i.e., demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the requirements, provided an acceptable management and Technical approach to tasks; and provided complete response to customer needs) | |
| UNSATISFACTORY = | Offeror performance DID NOT meet customer expectations or contract requirements routinely. | |
| NEUTRAL = | Offeror has no performance history and isl not be rated favorably or unfavorably. |
Attachment 4 - PP Questionnaire
| A. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| EXCEL |
| GOOD |
| SATIS |
| UNSATIS |
| NEUTRAL |
1. Contractor’s overall performance and management of contract requirements
2. Contractor’s ability to satisfy contract technical work requirements
3. Contractor’s process for controlling work ( receiving, validating, scheduling and tracking individual contract work requests)
4. Contractor’s Quality Control System (ability to identify and correct cause of non-conforming work or work processes)
5. Contractor’s Safety Program (record of safe operation)
Comments:
| B. OFFEROR PERSONNEL |
| EXCEL |
| GOOD |
| SATIS |
| UNSATIS |
| NEUTRAL |
1. Project Manager (ability to effectively manage the contract)
2. Supervisors (ability to supervise contract work)
3. Contractor’s Work Staff, including Subcontractors (adequately trained; possess necessary skills; perform effectively in accordance with contract terms; etc.)
Comments:
| C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| EXCEL |
| GOOD |
| SATIS |
| UNSATIS |
| NEUTRAL |
1. Timely contract start-up (acquired required licenses, training, administrative clearances, equipment, etc. and prepared to start performance by contract start date)
2. Timely performance of contract work
3. Timely performance of administrative actions (e.g. submission of required reports, records, and other data submissions)
4. Timely payments (payroll and subcontractor payments)
Comments:
PP Questionnaire
HT001125RE003
ATTACHMENT 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire
| D. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION |
| EXCEL |
| GOOD |
| SATIS |
| UNSATIS |
| NEUTRAL |
1. Contractor’s commitment for providing resources as necessary to resolve user problems and questions
2. Contractor’s ability to relate effectively to customer staff
3. Contractor’s ability to meet contract goals and objectives
4. Contractor’s positive and effective response to unexpected change and urgent requirements
| YES |
| NO |
| UNCERTAIN |
5. In your judgment, does the Contractor display integrity (appearing to adhere to a code of sound moral principals, uprightness, and honesty)?
6. WOULD YOU CONTRACT WITH THIS CONTRACTOR AGAIN FOR SIMILAR
SERVICES?
Comments:
COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR
The evaluation was performed by:
Name/Title of Evaluator: Signature of Evaluator: Date: Phone No. and Email Address
Attachment 4 - PP Questionnaire
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .