Attachment_3_USSOCOM_TE_Safety_Guide.pdf
PDF 55 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFI_TE_26_3_Rapid_Experimentation_of_Prototyping_in_Learning_Environments_Counter_Unmanned_Systems
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This is a Safety Guide for USSOCOM Technical Experimentation Events that establishes protocols for identifying and mitigating safety risks associated with equipment demonstrations.
The guide requires firms to submit safety risk documentation in the format of a Deliberate Risk Assessment (DD Form 2977) worksheet, with specific requirements available on sam.gov. Firms are encouraged to integrate system safety into their technology development process and submit additional safety artifacts beyond the required form, including Safety Assessment Reports, System/Subsystem Hazard Analyses, Laser Safety Evaluations, Interim/Final Hazard Classifications, Energetic Material Sensitivity Analyses, Fuse Safety Analyses, and Developmental Test Reports with incorporated Warnings/Cautions. The guide references MIL-STD-882E as the standard methodology for system safety practices across Department of War components and most defense contractors. For systems containing lasers, firms must provide Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD) with/without magnification, Optical Density requirements, design wavelength, beam divergence, output power, and independent laser output verification records to the range Laser Systems Safety Officer. For systems with energetic materials (propellants, pyrotechnics, explosives), documentation must include Interim Hazard Classification records, evaluations of novel energetic materials with sensitivity test results, evaluation of fusing/safe and arm/ignition safety systems, recommended standoff distances and surface danger zones, and summaries of prior live fire testing. For systems containing Radio Frequency/Magneto-Inductive emitters, required information includes number of frequencies and bands requested, transmitter output power and antenna gain, any RADHAZ analyses performed, and established Safe Stand-off Distances for ordnance, personnel, and fueling operations.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USSOCOM Technical Experimentation Event
Safety Guide
The purpose of this guide is to ensure safety risks associated with the operation of equipment to be demonstrated at a USSOCOM technical experimentation event are identified. Following a rigorous safety process will ensure proper mitigations are identified and implemented by facilitating a safe demonstration.
The desired format for submitting a record of safety risks is a Deliberate Risk Assessment (DRA) worksheet. An example is DD Form 2977 which can be found at this link: DD2977. However, the https://sam.gov/ posting should be consulted.
for specific requirements.
Firms developing material for the Department of War are encouraged to integrate system safety into the technology development process. Any outputs of this integration will be useful to the team managing the USSOCOM technical experimentation event.
Examples of common safety analyses include Safety Assessment Reports, System / Subsystem Hazard Analyses, Laser Safety Evaluations, Interim/Final Hazard Classifications, Energetic Material Sensitivity Analyses, Fuse Safety Analyses, and Developmental Test Reports & User Documentation with Warnings/Cautions incorporated.
The typical reference for System Safety within USSOCOM & the Department of War is Military-Standard 882, “Standard Practice: System Safety”. The current revision (MIL- STD-882E) is available publicly on the web.
The methodology described in MIL-STD-882E, to include the definitions of probability, severity & risk level, are utilized across all DOW Components & most defense contractors. Consider using these common terms and measures when developing hazard analyses. Submission of safety artifacts beyond the required DD2977 form is highly encouraged, as are efforts to tailor mitigations to the specific technology being demonstrated & the testing scenario.
For reference, the next page lists several areas of frequent concern with the general safety data requirements associated with each area.
If the system contains a laser, the following information should be readily available to the range Laser Systems Safety Officer:
Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD) with/without magnification (As applicable) https://va-form.com/ https://beta.sam.gov/ http://www.assistdocs.com/
Optical Density (OD) requirements Design wavelength Beam divergence Output power Any records of a verification of laser output (independent measurement preferred)
If the system contains energetic materials (e.g. propellants, pyrotechnics, explosives), the following information should be made available to the experimentation team:
Record of an Interim Hazard Classification (IHC) Any evaluation of Energetic materials [if novel] (e.g. sensitivity test results) Any evaluation of Fusing / Safe & Arm / Ignition Safety systems Recommended standoff distances, surface danger zones and/or range fans Summary of any prior live fire testing
If the system contains a Radio frequency / Magneto-Inductive (or other) emitter, the following information should be made available to the experimentation team:
Number of frequencies requested and band Transmitter output power Antenna gain Any “Radiation Hazard” (RADHAZ) analyses performed Any established Safe Stand-off Distances (SSDs) for Ordnance, Personnel & fueling operations
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .