Attachment 3 - Section M Evaluation Criteria - Vehicle Range.pdf

PDF 147 KB Posted

Attached to
NCETR Range Vehicle PM & Repairs
Solicitation number
15A00025Q00000108
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria Factors attachment for Request for Quote (RFQ) 15A00025Q00000108 issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The solicitation will award a Purchase Order using a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) methodology, with two primary evaluation volumes: Non-Price Factors (Technical Capability) and Price Factor. Offerors must submit a 3-page maximum Technical Approach demonstrating their capability to provide preventative maintenance services, including an organizational structure, organizational chart, and evidence of meeting the Statement of Work (SOW) requirements. The technical quote will be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable, with award going to the lowest-priced technically acceptable quote. Price submissions must include proposed discounts, and the government will evaluate total pricing by adding prices for all options to the basic requirement price.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3 – EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTORS FOR

15A00025Q00000108

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Government will award a Purchase Order resulting from this Request for Quote (RFQ) to the offeror whose quote is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). The ATF will award a contract to the lowest priced contractor whose quote meets or exceeds the technical capabilities in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Volume 1 - Non-Price Factors:

• Factor 1: Technical Capability

Volume 2 - Price Factor:

• Factor 3: Price

The LPTA Quote will be reviewed for technical acceptability. If it’s found to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further evaluation of the other Quotes received. If the quote is technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced Quote will be evaluated for technical acceptability until a technically acceptable Quote is found.

Non-Price Factors Evaluation:

Factor 1: Technical Capability - (3 page maximum).

Non-Price Factors:

Factor 1: Technical Capability

• The offeror provided an organization structure, including the organizational chart and supporting narrative description of offeror’s proposed preventative maintenance services, and any major subcontractor(s) and their key personnel assigned to the performance of this project.

• The offeror must meet the minimum technical capabilities of Section 3 SCOPE of the

SOW.

• The offeror provided proof of the ability to provide a timeline as described in Section 3 and section 4 preventative maintenance services of the SOW.

The Government requires offerors to submit a Technical Approach with their quote in response to the Statement of Work (SOW) in this RFQ. The Technical Approach shall clearly demonstrate the solution meets all the requirements in the SOW. The below chart identifies how the Technical Approach will be evaluated:

Table 1: Technical Approach - Ratings Acceptable Quote meets the requirements of the RFQ.

Unacceptable Quote does not meet the requirements of the RFQ.

Price Factor:

• Factor 2: Price

- The price quote shall be submitted separately from the offerors technical volume. The offeror pricing quote shall include the following:

o Any proposed discounts in the form of price reduction.

The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The purpose of the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed price in relation to the RFQ requirements. Price Evaluation: The total price will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer. The source selection decision will be made by the Contracting Officer.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .