Attachment 3 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Retailer Investigations Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12319821Q0050
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service is seeking a contractor to enhance Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program integrity through retailer investigations. The selected contractor will investigate retailers suspected of committing SNAP fraud, suggest new methods for identifying fraudulent retailers, determine if other local stores are committing fraud, and work with state and local partners on investigating SNAP fraud as directed by FNS. Relevant experience will be evaluated based on a contractor's on-site management, maintenance of professional relationships, ability to provide qualified personnel meeting objectives, quality control, meeting schedules, rectification of problems, and overall performance.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 12319821Q0050 Questions and Answers (002).pdf | ||
| RFQ 12319821Q0050.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ Cover Letter Retailer Investigations 1 rev.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS Retailer Investigations Projectcs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Commerical Clause Represntation and Cert.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Question Format.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 12319821Q0050
THIS FORM IS PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TO
AND SUBMITTAL BY THE VENDOR REFERENCES
Our company is being considered in a Source Selection by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Contract Management Division. It would be appreciated if you would provide comments regarding our past performance. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about a Vendors past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, respectfully request that you do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.
This form shall be sent via e-mailed to: Vanessa Boger-Wallace at Vanessa.boger-wallace@usda.gov and cc to Antoine Boissonniere at antoine.boissonniere@usda.gov.
Past Project Information:
1. Contractor name and address:
2. Contract Number and Project Title:
Evaluator (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential.)
| 1. | Name of Evaluator: | Date: |
| 2. | Phone Number: | |
| 3. | Address: | |
| 4. | Position held or function in relation to the project: |
RATINGS:
Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:
| (E) | Exceptional | The contractor’s performance greatly exceeded the stated requirements. | |
| (HA) | Highly Acceptable The contractor’s performance exceeded the stated requirements. | ||
| (A) | Acceptable | The contractor’s performance met the stated requirements. | |
| (M) | Marginal | The contractor’s performance met the stated requirements, but with | difficulty. |
| (U) | Unacceptable | The contractor’s performance did not meet the stated requirements. |
Please rate and provide any supporting information for the following: (Use additional sheets as necessary)
1. The contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors.
2. The contractor’s ability to maintain a professional working relationship with Government personnel.
3. The contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel to meet performance objectives as outlined in the Performance Work Statement or Statement of Work.
5. The contractor’s quality control ability.
6. The contractor’s ability to meet the performance schedule.
7. Was the contractor provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
8. The contractor’s ability to rectify identified problems in a timely fashion without further incident of the same.
9. Has the contractor been given any of the following: Cure notice; show cause, letters of reprimand, suspension of payments, termination? If yes, please explain.
10. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please explain.
11. Was the contractor provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
12. The contractor maintained a professional working relationship with Government personnel.
OVERALL RATING: _________________________
Please provide any additional comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .