Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 220 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cranes and Hoists Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA442722R0002
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors on a federal solicitation. The solicitation is for cranes and hoists maintenance services with a number FA442722R0002 from the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command. The questionnaire asks respondents to evaluate an offeror's past performance on a previous contract by selecting a rating and providing a narrative for any ratings of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale assessing the offeror's ability to provide experienced managers, qualified personnel, quality control, problem identification and resolution, schedule adherence, project supervision, timely payments, cost proposals, and cooperation. It also asks if the offeror received any cure or show cause notices and whether the respondent would award another contract to the offeror, requesting explanations for any negative responses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment FA442722R00020001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - SCA 2015-5655.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA442722R0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS Cranes and Hoists 30 Sep 21.rtf | RTF text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the oPrime Contractor o Sub-Contractor o Key Personnel. B.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Name of Respondent:
Address:
FAX:
Email:
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
60th Contracting Squadron Attn: SrA Ronald Aquino ronald_wendell.aquino@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
1 2 3 4 5 Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5. Identified problems as they occurred.
6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
7. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
8. Developed realistic progress schedules.
9. Met established project schedules.
10. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
11. Provided adequate project supervision.
12. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
13. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
16. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ No
☐ Yes ☐ No
☐ Yes
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Contractor
Blank Page
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .