Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FA557021Q0001 - Medical Custodial Services
- Solicitation number
- FA557021Q0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity to provide Medical Custodial Services at two Royal Air Force bases in the United Kingdom. The U.S. Air Force is soliciting proposals to perform custodial services in accordance with the attached performance work statement. The past performance questionnaire requests information about the vendor's previous contracts including project details, value, period of performance, and role as either prime contractor or subcontractor. It also contains questions regarding the vendor's management, timeliness, quality control, problem-solving abilities, and overall performance on past projects that should be rated as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Proposals are due to the Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa by the dates indicated on the solicitation number FA557021Q0001.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA557021Q0001 Attachment 3
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Vendor’s Name: Telephone Number:
Address: Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Name/Number: $/£ Amount:
Contract Period or Project Period of Performance:
Vendor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Company/Organization:
Address: Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: lawrence.roman.gb@us.af.mil and heaven.carroll@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the vendor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not made in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the vendor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
mailto:lawrence.roman.gb@us.af.mil mailto:heaven.carroll@us.af.mil
Select the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Not
Applicable
1. Vendor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and provide adequate project supervision at the place of performance.
2. Vendor performed services on time.
3. Vendor’s quality control process were followed and were effective.
4. Vendor displayed initiative to solve problems or correct deficiencies and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.
5. How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
| Vendors Name: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Address: |
| Fax Number: |
| undefined: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Project Title and Brief Description of Work 1: |
| Project Title and Brief Description of Work 2: |
| Contract NameNumber: |
| Amount: |
| Contract Period or Project Period of Performance: |
| Vendor performed as the: Off |
| Prime Contractor: Off |
| SubContractor: Off |
| Name of Respondent: |
| Title: |
| CompanyOrganization 1: |
| CompanyOrganization 2: |
| Address 1: |
| Address 2: |
| Telephone Number_2: |
| Fax Number_2: |
| Email Address: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Text16: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .