Attachment 3_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 398 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Oil Water Separators & Grease Traps Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441724Q0236
About this file
This document is a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for Oil Water Separators & Grease Trap Maintenance services at Hurlburt Field, Florida.
The contract has a base period from October 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, with one-year base and four one-year option periods. The work includes maintenance and servicing of oil/water separators, grease traps, sewage lift stations, and holding tanks. The contractor must comply with government and industry standards, as well as applicable regulations. This is a small business set-aside contract under NAICS code 562998 with a $16.5 million size standard. The solicitation will be available on SAM.gov, and the point of contacts are 2d Lt Reymundo Rivera and Ashley Williams.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment - FA441724Q02360003.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Grease trap tank size.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA441724Q02360002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Copy of QandA Oil Water Sep_Grease Trap Mx.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 Wage Det 2015_4531 Rev 27_ dtd 21 Jul 24.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1_SOW Oil Water Sep_Grease Traps 7 Aug 24.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 _ Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Solicitation _ FA441724Q0236.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 _ Evaluation of Offerors.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA441724Q0236 Oil Water Separators & Grease Trap Maintenance
ATTACHMENT 3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number: Contract Type:
5. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number: Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Award Amount: Final Amount:
5. Project Title: Project Number:
7. Period of Performance:
Start Date: End Date:
SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:
6. Brief Project Description:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 2
Contract Specialist:
Email:
Contracting Officer:
Email:
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.
SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.
E V S M U N
Exceptional (Outstanding)
Very Good (Above Average)
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Available
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
2d Lt Reymundo Rivera reymundo.rivera.1@us.af.mill Ashley Williams ashley.williams.85@us.af.mil
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FA441724Q0236 Oil Water Separators & Grease Trap Maintenance
ATTACHMENT 3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 3
1. QUALITY: Performance adhered to contract requirements.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
2. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
3. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.
Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. No safety discrepancies were noted.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4
4. RELIABILITY: Contractor provided all deliverables by the date and time established in the contract.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
5. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .