Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 614 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Video Facility Engineering Support
- Solicitation number
- SPE470524Q1060
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Video Facility Engineering Support Services solicitation, RFQ SP4705-24-Q-1060.
The key details are: This is a Request for Quotes (RFQ) for video facility engineering support services to provide video post-production and live event broadcast systems support. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 512110 and a $40M size standard. Quotes are due by June 24, 2024 at 4:00 PM ET. The contract will be a firm-fixed price with a base year and two one-year options. Quotes will be evaluated on technical, past performance, and price factors. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Contracting Services Office is issuing the solicitation on behalf of DLA Headquarters Installation Support. The Past Performance Questionnaire requests information on the offeror's prior relevant contract experience, performance, and customer satisfaction.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
From: DLA, Contracting Services Office Fort Belvoir, VA, ATTN: DCSO-R3, Odemaris Dekle 8725 John J. Kingman Rd, Fort Belvoir. VA 22060
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE PACKAGE FOR
SERVICES RFQ SP4705-24-Q-1060
Submit completed past performance questionnaire form by 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time on June 24, 2024 to: Odemaris Dekle.
Email: odemaris.dekle@dla.mil
I am contacting you in reference to _____________________who has given us your name as a reference. My questions pertain to their record of past and current performance (if applicable). Where the term “Contractor” is used below, it refers to this firm (or contractor).
The information that you provide will be used in the best value evaluation. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible.
(1) Name of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:
(2) Contract Number:
(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract Prime Subcontractor
(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract Prime Subcontractor
(5) Length of time your agency/firm has been involved with the Contractor:
(6) Contract type:
(7) Contract value:
(8) Description of services:
(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS
No, complete page 2 of questionnaire
Yes, answer question (i) below,
(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR?
No __
Yes, provide details in (iv) below,
(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now?
No__
Yes, answer question below,
(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance?
No, provide details of changes in (iv) below, Yes
(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):
(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:
(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:
VIDEO FACILITY ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES
RFQ: SP4705-24-Q-1060
NOTE: IT IS THE OFFEROR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THIS PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE(S) ARRIVE AT CONTRACTING PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE IDENTIFIED IN THE
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE DOCUMENT(S).
VIDEO FACILITY ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES
RFQ: SP4705-24-Q-1060
CUI
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:
(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:
(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:
(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:
CUI
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
SURVEY FOR SERVICES
N e u tr al
U n ac ce p ta b le
M ar gi n al
A cc e p ta b le
G o o d
O u ts ta n d in g a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:
(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that complied with the contract requirements, specifications, and standards of quality.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate deliverables /reports.
(3) The Contractor established & maintained a quality program to ensure the ongoing quality of all significant processes.
(4) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
b.) COST CONTROL:
(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices in a timely basis.
(3) Contractor’s response to change order was timely and accurate. If the changes in costs/price were initiated or caused by the Contractor, please explain in Comments Section.
c.) TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE AND DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE:
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the performance schedule, deliverable schedule and period of performance of the contract.
(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
d.) MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s
Representative (COR) and/or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, COTR and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to identified risk areas and/or critical program issues.
(6) The Contractor planned for initial implementation of the project and achieved operation of task requirements once the contract began.
e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY and NON-KEY PERSONNEL:
(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor’s performance.
(2) The Contractor provided the proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
(3) The Contractor maintained a trained, qualified and experienced workforce in sufficient numbers to meet contract requirements.
f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program for the contract task requirements.
(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the COTR.
(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.
CUI
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .