Attachment 3 Past performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 669 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008424R0051
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a contractor providing asbestos and lead sampling services. The questionnaire is to be completed by both the contractor and a client for a prior relevant project. It requests details on the contract, project description, ratings of the contractor's performance, and signatures from the client and their point of contact information. Adjective ratings are provided to evaluate the contractor's performance on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory. The questionnaire appears to be an attachment for contractors to include with their proposal when pursuing the asbestos and lead sampling services contract opportunity in Japan described in the accompanying document.
The accompanying federal contract opportunity document is a solicitation for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for asbestos and lead sampling services at various U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Air Force bases throughout Japan. The single-award IDIQ contract will have a one-year base period and four one-year options, requiring the contractor to provide all labor, equipment, transportation and other resources to perform sampling as non-recurring work items on an as-needed basis at locations including Yokosuka, Sasebo, Atsugi, Misawa, Iwakuni, Camp Fuji, Okinawa, and others. The Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(CUI)
ASBESTOS AND LEAD SAMPLING SERVICES
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 1
ATTACHMENT C
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 2
QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT
RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 3
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.
There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 4
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 5
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 6
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 7
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
U.S. Bases, Japan Region
N40084-24-R-0051
Rev. Jan 2018 8
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .