Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Surgical Equipment Repair Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HT941026Q7599
Issued by
Defense Health Agency

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a surgical equipment maintenance contract issued by the Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity (DHACA) Healthcare Contracting Division-West. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide on-site surgical equipment preventative maintenance, repair, and training services at the Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska Military Treatment Facility, with a base period and four optional extension periods.

The PPQ is designed to evaluate potential contractors across multiple performance metrics, including fill rate, on-time performance, turnover rate, and replenishment capabilities. The assessment uses a rating scale from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U), with contractors rated on their ability to provide qualified healthcare workers, maintain staffing consistency, manage recruitment, and minimize service disruptions. The document requires detailed information about the contractor's past performance, contract specifics, and seeks a comprehensive evaluation to inform the selection process for this healthcare services opportunity.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Surgical Equipment Repair, newest first.
File Type Posted
Instrument Inventory Summary.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Instrument Maintenance Due.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Container Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HT941026Q7599 - Questions and Answers - 29 October 2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - PWS Surgical Equipment Maintenance.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - HT941026Q7599 JBER Surgical Equipment Repair.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity (DHACA) Healthcare Contracting Division-West (HCD-W) requests responses from qualified sources capable of providing the following: On-Site Surgical Equipment Preventative Maintenance, Repair and Training Services (base + 4 option periods) for the Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska Military Treatment Facility (MTF).

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and email to John Lam Ho (ho.j.lam.civ@health.mil) and Karen Cusson (karen.r.cusson.civ@health.mil).

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MARKET SEGMENT

Ancillary Services
Dental Services
Nursing Services
Physician Services

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

COMPLEXITY

Number of FTEs:

Number of Credentialed FTEs:

Number of Privileged FTEs:

Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime
Subcontractor
Teaming Partner
Joint Venture

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified HCW’s IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .