Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70B04C21R00000005
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a solicitation seeking integrated logistics support services. The contractor is proposing on a solicitation from the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection seeking logistics support for non-intrusive inspection equipment, radiation detection equipment, laboratory and scientific services equipment, legacy remote video surveillance systems, unattended ground sensor systems, agent support equipment, and various other support equipment. The completed questionnaire is due by December 28, 2020 and is to be emailed to two Customs and Border Protection contacts listed. The questionnaire asks for general contract information including value, award and completion dates, complexity, and requirements. It then rates the contractor's past performance on factors such as corporate commitment, quality of service, timeliness, and teaming arrangements using an adjectival rating system. The evaluator is asked to certify the accuracy of the information provided and include any additional comments.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 PR 2012-1330
70B04C21R00000005
Attachment 3
Past Performance Questionnaire
Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) solicitation 70B04C21R00000005, under PR2012-1330. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information is to be provided directly to Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and Eva Shaw-Taylor@cbp.dhs.gov. This information will not be disclosed to the Offeror. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to CBP, by email, to address shown below, no later than 5:00pm Eastern Standard Time (EST) December 28, 2020. If you have questions, please contact Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and eva.shaw-taylor@cbp.dhs.gov.
Completed questionnaires are to be emailed to the following addressees: Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and eva.shaw-taylor@cbp.dhs.gov
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION
3. CONTRACT NUMBER: 2a. EVALUATOR
| 4. CONTRACT VALUE: _______________________ | NAME: | |
| TITLE: | ||
| PHONE NO: |
| 5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: | 6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: | ||||
| / | / | / | / |
7. CONTRACT TYPE (Circle All That Apply): 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One Response):
Fixed Price Cost-Plus Fixed Price Cost-Plus Award Fee DIFFICULT ROUTINE
T & M OTHER
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the Offeror’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set of sub factors with four possible adjectival ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this Offeror and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. Offeror performance factors are:
| A. CORPORATE COMMITMENT |
| B. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| D. TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS |
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| OUTSTANDING | Contractor’s performance significantly exceeded the contract requirements. | |
| GOOD | Contractor’s performance exceeded the contract requirements. | |
| ACCEPTABLE | Contractor’s performance met contract requirements. | |
| UNSATISFACTORY | UNSATISFACTORY | Contractor’s performance was less than acceptable and was unable to perform contract requirements |
| successfully. | ||
| N/A | Not applicable. | |
| A | ||
| CORPORATE COMMITMENT | ||
| Outstanding | ||
| Good | ||
| Acceptable | ||
| Unsatisfactory | ||
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Contractor’s effectiveness in providing contract and project management |
| 2. |
| Contractor’s systematic approach to provide the most current technologies, services and techniques available in the market place. |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s understanding and effectiveness in responding to user requirements. |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s ability to establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures. |
| B |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Quality of goods/services provided by contractor. |
| 2. |
| Quality of reports and documentation (i.e., accurate, current and complete) provided by contractor. |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts. |
| 4. |
| Contractor ability to supply professional and qualified personnel. |
| 5. |
| Contractor ability to respond to emergency situations to include staffing and responsiveness. |
D
TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS
| Did the Prime contractor execute a teaming arrangement? (Circle Y or N) |
| YES |
| NO |
| What percentage of the contract award work was performed by the team members? (Provide Percentage) |
| _____% |
| Did the contractor have an effective partnership with its team members? |
| YES |
| NO |
GENERAL TOPICS
| Was the contractor prompt in providing personnel with appropriate security clearances? |
| YES |
| NO |
Did the contractor comply with 508 requirements?
(when applicable)
| YES |
| NO |
C
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Contractor’s adherence to contract delivery schedules in the following areas: |
(a) Performance of services
(b) Delivery of reports or other documentation
(c) Qualified Staffing
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? YES NO
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2. What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3. What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4. Would you award another contract to this contractor? YES No
COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .