Amendment_A0002_Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70B04C21R00000005
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a solicitation from the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection. The solicitation is for integrated logistics support services for non-intrusive inspection equipment, radiation detection equipment, laboratory and scientific services equipment, legacy remote video surveillance systems, unattended ground sensor systems, agent support equipment, and various support equipment. The period of performance and pricing terms are not specified. Respondents are to provide an assessment of an offeror's past performance based on adjectival ratings in factors such as corporate commitment, quality of service, timeliness of performance, and teaming arrangements as well as open-ended questions. Completed questionnaires must be returned to the agency by the proposal due date in order to be considered in the past performance evaluation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_A0004_Synopsis of Revised Documents.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0004_Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0004_RFP No. 70B04C21R00000005 - revised.pdf PDF
Amendment_A0004_Attachment 2 Solicitation Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_A0003_Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0003_Attachment 2 Solicitation Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_A0002_Attachment 1 Statement of Work.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0002_Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0002_Attachment 2 Solicitation Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_A0002_Synopsis of Revised Documents.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0002_RFP No. 70B04C21R00000005 - revised.pdf PDF
Amendment_A0001_RFP No. 70B04C21R00000005 with track changes.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0001_Attachment 4 Labor Category Descriptions.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0001_Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0001_Attachment 1 Statement of Work.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0001_Attachment 1 Statement of Work - track changes.docx DOCX document
Amendment_A0001_RFP No. 70B04C21R00000005 - revised.pdf PDF
Amendment_A0001_Attachment 13 OEM List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_A0001_Attachment 2 Solicitation Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_A0001_Cover Letter.docx DOCX document
RFP No. 70B04C21R00000005.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Statement of Work.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Solicitation Pricing Tables.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10 Albuquerque DX and Critical Repair Part Min-Max Levels.docx DOCX document
Attachment 11 Wage Determination No 2015-4281 - Rev 16 (LRN).pdf PDF
Attachment 5 ILS Equipment List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 Additional Equipment Listing.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 Locations of Equipment.docx DOCX document
Attachment 8 Operations Center Call Volume.docx DOCX document
Cover Letter.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 Labor Category Descriptions.docx DOCX document
Attachment 9 ILD Albuquerque Throughput.docx DOCX document
Attachment 12 Wage Determination No 2015-5443 - Rev 10 (ABQ).pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information—See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 PR 2012-1330

70B04C21R00000005

Attachment 3

Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire

PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS

The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) solicitation 70B04C21R00000005, under PR2012-1330. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information is to be provided directly to Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and Eva Shaw-Taylor@cbp.dhs.gov. This information will not be disclosed to the Offeror. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to CBP, by email, to addresses shown below, no later than due date of proposals. If you have questions, please contact:

Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and eva.shaw-taylor@cbp.dhs.gov.

Completed questionnaires are to be emailed to the following addressees: Sonya.L.Freeman@cbp.dhs.gov and eva.shaw-taylor@cbp.dhs.gov

PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION

1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION

3. CONTRACT NUMBER: 2a. EVALUATOR

4. CONTRACT VALUE: _______________________NAME:
TITLE:
PHONE NO:
5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
////

7. CONTRACT TYPE (Circle All That Apply): 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One Response):

Fixed Price Cost-Plus Fixed Price Cost-Plus Award Fee DIFFICULT ROUTINE

T & M OTHER

9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:

PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING

On the following pages, please summarize the Offeror’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set of sub factors with four possible adjectival ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents your experience with this Offeror and indicate your assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. Offeror performance factors are:

A. CORPORATE COMMITMENT
B. QUALITY OF SERVICE
C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
D. TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS

Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:

OUTSTANDINGContractor’s performance significantly exceeded the contract requirements.
GOODContractor’s performance exceeded the contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLEContractor’s performance met contract requirements.
UNSATISFACTORYUNSATISFACTORYContractor’s performance was less than acceptable and was unable to perform contract requirements
successfully.
N/ANot applicable.
A
CORPORATE COMMITMENT
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Unsatisfactory
N/A
1.
Contractor’s effectiveness in providing contract and project management
2.
Contractor’s systematic approach to provide the most current technologies, services and techniques available in the market place.
3.
Contractor’s understanding and effectiveness in responding to user requirements.
4.
Contractor’s ability to establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures.
B
QUALITY OF SERVICE
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Unsatisfactory
N/A
1.
Quality of goods/services provided by contractor.
2.
Quality of reports and documentation (i.e., accurate, current and complete) provided by contractor.
3.
Contractor’s ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts.
4.
Contractor ability to supply professional and qualified personnel.
5.
Contractor ability to respond to emergency situations to include staffing and responsiveness.

D

TEAMING ARRANGEMENTS

Did the Prime contractor execute a teaming arrangement? (Circle Y or N)
YES
NO
What percentage of the contract award work was performed by the team members? (Provide Percentage)
_____%
Did the contractor have an effective partnership with its team members?
YES
NO

GENERAL TOPICS

Was the contractor prompt in providing personnel with appropriate security clearances?
YES
NO

Did the contractor comply with 508 requirements?

(when applicable)

YES
NO

C

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Unsatisfactory
N/A
1.
Contractor’s adherence to contract delivery schedules in the following areas:

(a) Performance of services

(b) Delivery of reports or other documentation

(c) Qualified Staffing

1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default? YES NO

If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).

2. What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?

3. What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?

4. Would you award another contract to this contractor? YES No

COMMENTS:

PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR

TITLE OF EVALUATOR DATE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .