Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (1).pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted Dec 2, 2025

Attached to: Fy26 Local and Long-Distance Telecommunication Services Renewal
Solicitation number: FA462026QA207
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 2, 2025

This document is a Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for FY26 Local and Long Distance Telecommunication Services at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. The questionnaire is part of Solicitation No. FA462026QA207 and is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous contractors. It requires respondents to evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including reliability, technical specifications compliance, communication effectiveness, employee competence, responsiveness to changes, safety adherence, and overall service quality. Responses are to be submitted by December 16, 2025, at 1:00 PM Pacific time, with submission options including email to specified Air Force personnel or mail to the contracting office at 92 CONS/PKA, 110 W. Ent St, Fairchild AFB, WA 99011.

The questionnaire includes a comprehensive rating scale from 1-5 (Unsatisfactory to Exceptional) for evaluating various performance aspects, such as contract employee competence, deficiency correction, regulatory compliance, and modern solution offerings. It also requests specific comments for each rating and asks additional questions about licensing, contract discrepancy reports, cure notices, and willingness to award future contracts. The document provides contact information for SrA Michael Salone (509-247-8082) for any questions about the questionnaire, emphasizing the importance of thorough and accurate performance feedback for future telecommunications service contracts.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
26QA207 Amendment 02.pdf	PDF	Dec 17, 2025
26QA207 Amendment 01.pdf	PDF	Dec 9, 2025
Attach. 1 - Statement of Work.pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025
26QA207 Combo FINAL.pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025
Attach. 2 - WD 2015-5537 (Rev. 26).pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FY26 Local and Long Distance Telecommunication Services

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

SOLICITATION NO: FA462026QA207

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire.

The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing the FY26 Local and Long Distance Telecommunication Services at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to SrA Michael Salone at , at michael.salone@us.af.mil, Ms. Sarah O'Neil at sarah.oneil.1@us.af.mil, and Capt Nicholas Kortis at nicholas.kortis.1@us.af.mil. Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: SrA Michael Salone 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB, WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to SrA Michael Salone at (509) 247-8082. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 16 December 2025, at 1:00 PM (Pacific)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _

Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title for this project?

FA462026QA207

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

1083596917A Highlight

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call SrA Michael Salone @ 509-247-8082

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor’s reliability and performance of the services being requested on Contracts similar to what is being requested on this contract?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. How well did contractor meet technical specifications and standards?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. How well was communication received and relayed when/if there were any telecom issues?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462026QA207

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

4. Did the contract employees demonstrate competence and collaboration?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. Was the contractor responsive to contract changes?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. How effective was the contractor staff in consistently following health, safety, and telecom regulations??

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

8. Did the contractor offer modern telecom solutions?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

9. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

10. Did contract personnel possess all required licensing and certifications prior to start date? Yes/No ____

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

11. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

FA462026QA207

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

12. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? Yes/No ___

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

13. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____ Please explain in "remarks”.

REMARKS:

FA462026QA207

Attachment 3- Past Performance Questionnaire

Contractors name and address:

Point of Contact:

Phone:

Contract Number:

Project Title:

Period of Performance:

Respondents name and address Organization:

Address:

City:

Respondents Name and Title:

Commercial Phone:

DSN Phone:

Fax:

EMail:

Contract Type ie Firm Fixed Price:

Award Amount:

Final Amount:

What was the job title for this project:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 1:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 2:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 3:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 4:

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract 5:

replacements for personnel that discontinued employment under this contract:

undefined:

5_2:

2_2:

1_2:

undefined_2:

3 How well did the contractor meet timelines:

5_3:

2_3:

1_3:

undefined_3:

5_4:

2_4:

1_4:

4_2:

3_2:

1_5:

4_3:

3_3:

1_6:

4_4:

3_4:

1_7:

4_5:

3_5:

1_8:

5 1:

5 2:

4_6:

3_6:

1_9:

10 Did contract personnel possess all required licensing and certifications prior to start date YesNo:

11 Were Contract Discrepancy Reports CDR issued YesNo:

Were they addressed appropriately YesNo:

If so how 1:

If so how 2:

13 Would you award another contract to this contractor YesNo:

REMARKS 1:

REMARKS 2:

1_10:

2_5:

1_11:

2_6:

1_12:

2_7:

1_13:

2_8:

1_14:

2_9:

1_15:

2_10:

1_16:

2_11:

1_17:

2_12:

1_18:

2_13:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 2, 2025.