Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 156 KB Posted

Attached to
Watercraft Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA481920R0005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The Air Force Air Combat Command is seeking a contractor to provide waterborne support services for target launch and recovery programs. The selected contractor will operate and maintain government vessels to support watercraft operations at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida. Responsibilities include recovering aerial drone targets, parachutes, and performing all vessel maintenance and repairs. Respondents are asked to provide performance ratings and additional feedback on an offeror's past contracts within five calendar days of receipt. The completed questionnaire will be included in the source selection documentation for contract award.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 8

The 325th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Air Combat Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Watercraft Requirement. This acquisition is in support of the Watercraft Operations at Tyndall AFB, FL. The contractor will be responsible for the Government-owned vessels and all other associated Government-furnished property necessary to maintain sea readiness of the assigned vessels. This contract will support the recovery of aerial drone targets, drone parachutes, and all associated vessel maintenance and repair. There is very little risk associated with this requirement.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 5 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to SSgt Allyson Cooper, allyson.cooper@us.af.mil, and Mrs. Deborah Williams, deborah.williams.3@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

DEBORAH F. WILLIAMS, GS13, DAFC

Contracting Officer, 325 CONS

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

WILLIAMS.DEBORAH

.FAYE.1066457024

Digitally signed by WILLIAMS.DEBORAH.FAYE.1066457024 Date: 2020.05.26 09:35:19 -05'00'

When Filled in This Document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ______________________ Telephone Number: __________________ Address: ______________________________

Point of Contact: ________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _______________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ______________________ Dollar Amount: __________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: __________________________

Address: ____________________________________

Telephone Number: _______________________________

Email Address: _____________________________________

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

SSgt Allyson Cooper, allyson.cooper@us.af.mil Ms. Deborah Williams, deborah.williams.3@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

In the questions below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by checking the appropriate box under each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________ CONTRACT NUMBER ______________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Were you satisfied with the quality of services received?

2. Did the contractor maintain accurate records and submit timely reports that were part of the contract requirements?

3. Did the contractor provide timely resolution of contract discrepancies?

4. Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts?

5. Did the contractor identify problems as they occurred?

6. Did the contractor suggest alternative approaches to problems?

The contractor: E V S M U N/A

7. Did the contractor display initiative to solve problems?

8. Did the contractor provide the necessary equipment and materials to meet the contract requirements?

9. Did the contractor maintain government/contractor equipment in a safe and usable manner?

10. Did the contractor provide timely resolution of warranty defects?

11. Did the contractor provide effective Quality Control/inspection procedures throughout the duration of awarded contract?

12. Did the contractor demonstrate the ability to quickly remedy deficiencies in management and overall contract performance?

13. Did the contractor provide an experienced manager and key personnel with the technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirement?

14. Did the contractor provide adequate project supervision?

15. Did the contractor demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and if necessary, replace in a timely manner qualified personnel during the contract period?

16. Did the contractor allow the site manager sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance?

17. Did the contractor meet the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price?

18. Did the contractor pay subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner?

19. Has the contractor demonstrated unreasonable and uncooperative behavior in resolving technical or contractual issues?

YES/NO

20. Did the contractor have a necessary experience in “watercraft operations or similar type services?”

YES/NO

21. Did modifications require extensive negotiations? YES/NO

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under this contract? If yes, please explain the outcome in the “remarks” section.

YES/NO

23. Did the contractor follow through after contract award on the terms outlined in their proposal (i.e.; organizational plan, staffing plan, and quality control plan)?

YES/NO

24. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

25. Is the contract rated in CPARS? YES/NO

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:_______________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .