Attachment 3 - Instructions to Offeror.pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Coin Destruction Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70US0924R00DB01
About this file
This document is the Instructions to Offerors for a firm fixed price solicitation for Counterfeit Coin Destruction. The Government intends to award a contract based on the Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation criteria. Offerors must submit a technical volume demonstrating their approach to execute the tasks in the Statement of Work (SOW) and confirm their ability to meet the standards. Offerors must also provide at least one example of relevant corporate experience as a prime contractor within the last five years. The Government will first evaluate the technical capability of the lowest priced offeror and will only evaluate the next lowest priced proposal if the initial one is not found to be technically acceptable. The quoted price must be determined fair and reasonable. This is a Small Business Set-Aside with a NAICS code of 562112 and a $41.5M size standard.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 - RFIs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Instructions to Offeror Rev 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Provisions and ClausesRev 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Coin Destruction SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
I. INTRODUCTION
This is firm fixed price solicitation for Counterfeit Coin Destruction.
II. BASIS FOR AWARD
The Government intends to award a firm fixed price contract.
The Government intends to evaluate proposals on the basis of Lowest
Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA). If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be Technically Acceptable, the government will evaluate the next lowest priced proposal, and so on. Proposals determined to be incomplete, unreasonable, or unrealistic will not be considered for award.
To be determined technically acceptable, Offerors must submit a technical volume that includes the following:
1) The Offeror shall describe their approach to execute the tasks in
SOW 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 from day one of contract start through the life of the contract. Offerors shall also confirm they can meet the standards of the requirement outlined in SOW 1.4.
2) Offerors must include at least one (1) examples of its own corporate experience as a prime contractor within the last five (5) years (of the RFP release date) in which the Offeror performed work of a similar nature (similar in scope and magnitude) to this effort. Each experience shall be no more than one (1) page in length, three (3) pages total, font size 11.
The Government intends to award without discussions (although it reserves the right to conduct discussions). Therefore, the submitted proposal should represent the offeror’s best offer.
III. STRUCTURE OF PROPOSAL
Evaluation Criteria
. In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.1, demonstrate that it will meet all requirements of the solicitation, and conform to all required terms and conditions.
Order of Importance
In making its award determination, the Government will consider the evaluation factors listed in the following descending order of importance.
• Factor 1: Technical Capability
• Factor 2: Price
The Government will first evaluate Factor 1: Technical Capability for the lowest priced offeror. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be
Technically Acceptable, the government will evaluate the next lowest priced proposal, and so on. Proposals determined to be incomplete, unreasonable, or unrealistic will not be considered for award. The quoted price must be determined fair and reasonable for award.
Evaluation Factors
Evaluation Factor 1: Technical Capability
The Offeror shall demonstrate how its technical capabilities are tied to the
Government’s requirements. The purpose is to provide the Government with confidence that the Offeror understands the requirement and will successfully perform the work, based on its technical capabilities.
Evaluation Factor 2: Price
This factor will be evaluated for price reasonableness. The price for the Base and all Option Years will be added together to calculate a Total Evaluated
Price by which the offeror will be evaluated. Offerors are encouraged to offer discounts in their quotation.
Evaluation Methodology
The Government will first evaluate Factor 1: Technical Capability for the lowest priced offeror. If the lowest priced proposal is not found to be
Technically Acceptable, the government will evaluate the next lowest priced proposal, and so on. Proposal determined to be incomplete, unreasonable, or unrealistic will not be considered for award. The quoted price must be determined fair and reasonable for award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .