Attachment 3 - Evaluation Criteria.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DJA-24-ALAB-PR-0025
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation criteria for a solicitation seeking maintenance services for an Oxford Instruments energy dispersive spectroscopy system. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives will award a contract to the lowest priced technically acceptable offeror. Technical capability will be evaluated on the contractor's ability to perform annual preventative maintenance with priority technical support by Oxford-certified technicians using factory-certified parts, along with software and firmware updates and unlimited remote desktop support. Price will also be a factor, with proposals assessed for reasonableness of cost. The solicitation number is DJA-24-ALAB-PR-0025 for maintenance of an Oxford Instrument system owned by the Department of Justice agency.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 3 - Evaluation Criteria - Updated.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 - Brand Name Justification_Redacted.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Quotation Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 5 - CLINS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3 – EVALUATION CRITERIA
Oxford’s Aztec Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy Equipment Maintenance
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
The Government will award a Contract resulting from this Request for Proposal (RFP) to the offeror whose Proposal is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable. The ATF will award a contract to the lowest priced contractor whose proposal meets or exceeds the technical capabilities in the Statement of Work (SOW).
Only the lowest priced proposal will be reviewed for technical acceptability. If it’s found to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further evaluation of the other proposals received. If the proposal is technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability until a technically acceptable proposal is found.
Non-Price Factors:
· Factor 1: Technical Capability (Personnel Requirements)
The Government will evaluate the Technical Capability that demonstrate the offeror’s organizational structure and personnel manage and perform as defined in this solicitation. Additionally, the proposal must demonstrate the offeror ability to meet the following:
· The contract shall include one (1) scheduled annual preventative maintenance visit and priority status for technical support.
· Must show proof that the work will be performed by service technicians certified and authorized by Oxford, and all replacement parts must be factory certified by Oxford.
· The computers purchased from Oxford with the original instrument purchase is required for the operation of the system and is to be included in the support plan. Software and firmware updates as part of preventative or corrective maintenance visits shall be included.
· Must include unlimited remote desktop support and loaner equipment (if applicable)
Price Factor:
· Factor 2: Price
The purpose of the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the submitted price.
EVALUATION PROCEDURES
Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating
Offeror’s Technical Capability will be rated using an Acceptable/Unacceptable rating system.
Technical Capability
Table 1: Technical Capability - Personnel Requirements Ratings
| Adjectival Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .