Attachment_3_-_DHM_SJDS_RBM_Survey_Report_Final.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted Aug 19, 2026

Attached to: SAF FRSP GEOTHERMAL HVAC SJDS
Solicitation number: 140P4226R0023
Issued by: Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Aug 19, 2026

This is a Regulated Building Materials Survey Report prepared by Mabbett & Associates, Inc. for the Jackson Shrine Death Site (SJDS) located at 12019 Stonewall Jackson Road in Woodford, Virginia. The survey was conducted as a subcontractor to DHM under a Task Order Agreement dated July 18, 2024, with the objective of identifying asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-containing paint (LCP) within the historic structure to support HVAC rehabilitation design documents.

The survey identified sixteen (16) bulk samples for suspected ACM collected and analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with EPA standards. All samples tested negative for asbestos—none contained greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos as defined by EPA and OSHA. Five (5) paint chip samples were collected and analyzed for lead content using EPA Method SW846-3050B/7000B. All paint chip samples exceeded the HUD threshold of 0.5 percent by weight for lead, with concentrations ranging from 0.91% to 6.5%. The report recommends that any suspect ACM encountered during renovation must be assumed to contain asbestos unless laboratory analysis proves otherwise, and that workers involved with paint-disturbing activities must comply with OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62 for lead exposure. The report notes that TCLP testing should be performed on waste streams generated during planned demolition due to lead paint presence. The survey was completed on August 8, 2024, with laboratory analysis completed on August 19, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Sol_140P4226R0023_Amd_0002.pdf	PDF	Sep 30, 2026
Sol_140P4226R0023_Amd_0001.pdf	PDF	Sep 25, 2026
Attachment_1_-_Specifications_FRSP_Geothermal_HVAC.pdf	PDF	Aug 19, 2026
Attachment_4_-_Wage_Determination__VA20260015.pdf	PDF	Aug 19, 2026
Attachment_6_-_Certifications_From_Section_K.docx	DOCX document	Aug 19, 2026
Attachment_2_-_Drawings_FRSP_Geothermal_HVAC.pdf	PDF	Aug 19, 2026
Attachment_7_-_Limitations_on_Subcontracting_compliance_worksheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 19, 2026
Sol_140P4226R0023.pdf	PDF	Aug 19, 2026
Attachment_5_-__Technical_Capability_Submittals.docx	DOCX document	Aug 19, 2026

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

REGULATED BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY

REPORT-DESIGN GEOTHERMAL HVAC SYSTEM FOR

THE JACKSON SHRINE DEATH SITE (SJDS)

NPS-GSA Northeast Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park – CBF Jackson Shrine 12019 Stonewall Jackson Road Woodford, Virginia 22580

Mabbett Project No. R2020001.005

FMSS #23801

August 30, 2024

Prepared For:

900 S. Broadway, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80209

Mabbett & Associates, Inc. www.mabbett.com 105 Central Street, Suite 4100 Stoneham, MA 02180-1260 T. 781-275-6050 F: 781-954-5155 Massachusetts | Virginia | Rhode Island | New York

REGULATED BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY REPORT

Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site ꟾ Woodford, VA

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This Regulated Building Materials Survey Report has been prepared by Mabbett & Associates, Inc. (Mabbett®) for the design services for a Geothermal HVAC system at the Jackson Shrine Death Site house structure located at 12019 Stonewall Jackson Road in Woodford, Virginia. The information presented herein is based on the facts and information conveyed to or received by Mabbett during the preparation of this report. If any of the information provided to Mabbett that was used in preparing this report is incorrect, incomplete, or subject to change, Mabbett would wish to alter its opinion(s) accordingly. In addition, the professional opinions and information contained in this report are based solely on the requirements of the applicable regulations and technical data as known to Mabbett as of the date of this report and considered applicable to this report.

Mabbett has conducted this assessment with reasonable care and has performed this project in accordance with industry standards. There can be no assurances, and Mabbett makes no assurances, that the information, research, and technology used to prepare this report may not change in the future, thus affecting the results reported herein.

This Regulated Building Materials Survey Report was prepared by Mr. David Nelson CSP, a Senior Industrial Hygienist and Environmental Consultant with Mabbett & Associates, Inc.

This report has been reviewed and approved by:

Michael F. Delaney Practice Lead, Building Sciences

DAN/MFD:caf

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Summary of Survey Results

1.2 Purpose and Objectives

2.0 ACM SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

2.2 Analytical Methodology

2.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials Findings

3.0 LCP SURVEY

3.1 Screening Survey and Sampling Methodology

3.2 Summary of Lead Paint Chip Screening Survey Findings

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 ACM Survey

4.2 LCP Survey

5.0 LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Asbestos Sampling Results Table 2 Summary of Lead in Paint Chip Sampling Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A SAI Asbestos Containing Materials Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Appendix B SAI Lead Paint Chip Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Appendix C Sample Locations on Floor Plans

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of the Regulated Building Materials Survey (the Survey) completed by Mabbett and Associates, Inc. (Mabbett®) at the at the Jackson Shrine Death Site house structure located at 12019 Stonewall Jackson Road in Woodford, Virginia. The Survey was conducted by Mabbett as a subcontractor to DHM under the terms and conditions of the Task Order Agreement dated July 18, 2024, Supplemental Services 02: Additional Hazardous Material Studies - AE Design Services for Construction Documents. The objective of the Survey was to identify asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead containing paint (LCP) within the interior and exterior of the Jackson Shrine Death Site house so that an abatement scope can be incorporated into the client’s design documents being developed for HVAC rehabilitation.

1.1 Summary of Survey Results

Bulk samples of suspected Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) were collected and submitted to a State of Virginia licensed analytical laboratory for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM). The Survey also included the collection of suspect lead containing paint (LCP) chip samples for submittal for lead analysis by an AIHA accredited analytical laboratory.

The Survey involved the collection or screening of the following samples, resulting in the following conclusions:

▪ Sixteen (16) bulk samples for suspect ACM were collected. Based on laboratory analysis of suspect ACM, none of the collected samples contained asbestos. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines ACM as any material that contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

▪ Five (5) paint chip samples from building surfaces were collected. Based on laboratory analysis of paint chips, all the collected samples revealed concentrations of lead in paint that exceeded the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) threshold of 0.5 percent by weight.

1.2 Purpose and Objectives

The Survey was comprised of two primary tasks Including:

▪ Evaluation of existing site conditions and formulation of a sampling plan;

▪ Sampling to collect building material samples for laboratory analysis.

The Survey was designed to accomplish two primary objectives: collect a representative number of building materials for laboratory analysis and reporting; and use data from the laboratory analysis efforts to estimate the volume of hazardous materials present within the building’s interior and exterior for subsequent use in development of an abatement scope. These two objectives were met through a combination of the site visit and inspection to collect building material samples for laboratory analysis; and interpretation of qualitative data collected in the field; and the quantitative laboratory data generated from analysis of the building materials as summarized in this survey report.

2.0 ACM SURVEY

The ACM Survey was completed on August 8, 2024, by Mr. David Nelson, Certified Safety Professional (CSP) of Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Mr. Nelson is also Environmental Protection Agency/Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (EPA/AHERA) accredited, and both a Virginia licensed asbestos inspector and management planner.

The two-story structure was originally constructed in 1828 and consists of a brick foundation with wood beams and framing, plaster on walls and ceilings, with a wood shingled roof, and a clapboard façade. (See photograph 1).

Photograph 1 - Jackson Shrine Death Site house structure.

2.1 Sampling Methodology

The asbestos sampling activities were completed in accordance with the proposed scope of work. Suspect ACM’s were collected using EPA National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), 40 CFR Part 763 and Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and State of Virginia protocols. Bulk samples of suspect ACM were collected in accordance with AHERA and was conducted according to the following sampling plan:

▪ Surfacing material:

At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is 1,000 ft2 or less.

At least five bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2 but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

At least seven bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 ft2.

▪ Thermal system insulation:

At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area of thermal system insulation.

At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area of patched area of thermal system insulation.

Sufficient samples shall be collected from elbows and fittings to determine if they contain ACM.

Bulk samples shall not be collected from any homogeneous area where the state licensed asbestos inspector determined that the thermal system insulation is fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other non-ACM.

▪ Miscellaneous material:

At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is less than 100 ft2.

At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 100 ft2.

2.2 Analytical Methodology

The bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody procedures to Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) who comply with the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis. The samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining, in general accordance with EPA- 600/R-93/116.

The EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and Code of Virginia defines any material that contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos as being an ACM. As such, the analytical laboratory results indicated that none of the sampled suspect materials contained greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

Asbestos Containing Materials Laboratory reports and Chain-of-Custody documentation are provided in Appendix A of this report.

2.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials Findings

Mabbett identified four (4) types of homogenous materials and collected sixteen (16) representative bulk ACM samples. All sixteen (16) samples were analyzed by PLM. The laboratory reported analytical data indicated that none of the homogenous materials sampled contained asbestos.

Sample number, location, results, and the general condition of the sampled materials are provided in Table 1 below:

TABLE 1

Summary of Asbestos Sampling Results

Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site Woodford, VA

Sample Identification

Number

Sample Type

Sample Location - Material Sample

Date

Percentage Result and Asbestos

Type

Condition

JDS-01 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster 8/8/24 None

Detected Good

JDS-02 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster 8/8/24 None

Detected Good

JDS-03 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster 8/8/24 None

Detected Good

TABLE 1

Summary of Asbestos Sampling Results

Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site Woodford, VA

Sample Identification

Number

Sample Type

Sample Location - Material Sample

Date

Percentage Result and Asbestos

Type

Condition

JDS-04 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster 8/8/24 None

Detected Good

JDS-05 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster 8/8/24 None

Detected Good

JDS-06 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar

Paper 8/8/24

None Detected

Good

JDS-07 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar

Paper 8/8/24

None Detected

Good

JDS-08 Bulk Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar

Paper 8/8/24

None Detected

Good

JDS-09 Bulk Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic

Hatch 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-10 Bulk Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic

Hatch 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-11 Bulk Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic

Hatch 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-12 Bulk Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic

Hatch 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-13 Bulk Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic

Hatch 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-14 Bulk First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-15 Bulk First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

JDS-16 Bulk First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar 8/8/24

None Detected

Fair

Due to the historic nature of the structure, destructive sampling was not conducted. Samples were collected from areas that were already damaged or from areas that had no aesthetic or historic significance and as approved by the on-site National Park Service staff. AJC Architects identified building materials to the Mabbett inspector that could potentially be disturbed and therefore samples were collected from those areas. Floor plans identifying sample locations are provided in Appendix C.

3.0 LCP SURVEY

As part of the Survey, a visual inspection of interior and exterior painted surfaces was conducted by Mr. David Nelson, CSP of Mabbett. Mr. Nelson is a licensed lead risk assessor in the State of Virginia. Additionally, the LCP survey included the collection of paint chip samples for submittal for lead analysis by an AIHA accredited analytical laboratory.

3.1 Screening Survey and Sampling Methodology

Mabbett conducted an LCP screening survey to measure lead concentrations in selected painted surfaces of the Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site house structure located at 12019 Stonewall Jackson Road in Woodford, Virginia 22580. Five (5) paint chip samples were submittal to Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) of Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis of lead content. The collected samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA Method SW846-3050B/7000B. A copy of the laboratory analytical report and chain of custody is provided in Appendix B.

Floor plans identifying sample locations are provided in Appendix C.

3.2 Summary of Lead Paint Chip Screening Survey Findings

Sample number, location, and results of the sampled materials are provided in Table 2 below:

TABLE 2

Summary of Lead Paint Chip Analytical Results

Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site Woodford, VA

Sample I.D.

Location Sample Type Results (% wt.)

JDS-1L

Mechanical Room-At Entrance to

Crawl Space-Clapboard Chip 1.9%

JDS-2L

Mechanical Room-At Entrance to

Crawl Space-Clapboard Chip 6.5%

JDS-3L

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to

Crawlspace-Brick Chip 0.91%

JDS-4L

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to

Crawlspace-Brick Chip 2.3%

JDS-5L

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to

Crawlspace-Drywall Wall Chip 1.7%

The Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) does not recognize a “safe” level of lead in paint.

Depending on the method of removal used, even trace amounts of lead in paint may result in airborne concentrations of lead during removal. An employer or contractor who disturbs or removes lead paint must comply with OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1926.62, “Lead Exposure in Construction; Interim Final Rule.”

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This section presents the conclusions generated from the regulated building materials survey and sampling event conducted by Mabbett, at the Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site house.

4.1 ACM Survey

Results of our sampling efforts for ACM included the collection of sixteen (16) bulk samples for laboratory analysis and reporting. Asbestos was not detected in any of the samples. Results of this effort are summarized above in section 2.3.

Any suspect ACM encountered during renovation or construction activities that are not identified in this report as being non-ACM should be assumed to be ACM unless laboratory analytical data for bulk samples prove otherwise.

Suspect ACM that may be present within the walls, above inaccessible hard ceilings, or in other inaccessible locations, and that accordingly were not inspected should be assumed to contain asbestos if discovered until otherwise verified, as previously described. If ACM must be disturbed, the ACM must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and be performed in accordance with applicable regulations. If proposed work activities will not disturb intact ACM, continuous monitoring of ACM should be conducted throughout work activities to ensure the ACM remains in an intact condition. Additionally, prior to commencing work activities, personnel involved with the work activities should be made aware of the location of ACM, within the building in which they will be working.

4.2 LCP Survey

The purpose of the LCP screening survey was to identify building materials coated with lead-containing paint. For the purpose of this LCP screening survey, representative interior building components were tested. The regulations addressing LCP in non-residential buildings are focused on protecting workers involved with paint-disturbing activities and related waste-disposal activities. Results of this effort are summarized above in section 3.2.

A concentration of lead greater than or equal to 0.5 percent by weight exceeds the U.S. HUD residential standards and is an indicator of risk. OSHA does not specify a safe concentration of LCP. For the purposes of this LCP screening survey, lead concentrations greater than 0.5 percent by weight have been utilized as a threshold for areas where possible worker exposures may occur.

OSHA’s lead regulations will apply to any demolition operation (i.e., sanding, scraping, cutting, and welding) that would disturb painted surfaces which contain lead. Occupational exposure to lead is regulated by OSHA (29CFR 1910.1025) as well as applicable state regulations. These regulations involve air monitoring of workers to determine exposure levels when disturbing paint containing measurable lead. An LCP determination cannot determine a safe level of lead but is intended to provide guidance to the locations where LCP is present. Employers and contractors may use this information to better determine worker exposure to airborne lead by understanding the different concentrations of lead paint on representative components and surfaces. Worker exposure controls can then be implemented, and air monitoring can be performed during activities that disturb LCP.

Disposal of materials coated with paint containing lead is subject to the USEPA RCRA regulations. At the present time, federal and state regulations do not necessarily require that materials coated with LCP be removed prior to demolition. However, wastes generated are required to be characterized prior to disposal. Mabbett recommends that TCLP testing be performed on the waste stream generated during the planned demolition of the building.

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This Regulated Building Materials Survey Report is the result of a diligent search of select areas of the for asbestos and lead at the Stonewall Jackson Shrine Death Site house. Although a comprehensive inspection was performed, Mabbett does not claim to have identified all of the materials that may be present at/in the structure. Mabbett has conducted this assessment with reasonable care and has performed this project within generally accepted industry standards. Mabbett makes no assurances that the information, research, and technology used to prepare this report may not change in the future, thus affecting the results reported here.

APPENDIX A

Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) Laboratory Report and Chain-of-Custody

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10059575Customer: Mabbett & Associates 1442 Duke St Alexandria, VA 22314

Analysis:

Date Received:

David Nelson

PLM

08/12/2024

Project: DHM- Stonewall Jackson/R202001.005 Date Reported: 08/19/2024

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

JDS-01

10059575_0001

Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-02

10059575_0002

Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-03

10059575_0003

Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-04

10059575_0004

Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-05

10059575_0005

Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-06

10059575_0006

Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

None Detected 80% Cellulose 20% Other

Fibrous

Crushed, Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

JDS-07

10059575_0007

Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

None Detected 80% Cellulose 20% Other

Fibrous

Crushed, Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous

JDS-08

10059575_0008

Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

None Detected 80% Cellulose 20% Other

Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Black

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Katelyn Stewart (19)

Analyst Approved Signatory

Page 1 of 3P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10059575Customer: Mabbett & Associates 1442 Duke St Alexandria, VA 22314

Analysis:

Date Received:

David Nelson

PLM

08/12/2024

Project: DHM- Stonewall Jackson/R202001.005 Date Reported: 08/19/2024

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

JDS-09 - A

10059575_0009

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous finish

JDS-09 - B

10059575_0017

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous base

JDS-10 - A

10059575_0010

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Crushed, Dissolved

White

Heterogeneous finish

JDS-10 - B

10059575_0018

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Crushed, Dissolved

Gray

Heterogeneous base

JDS-11 - A

10059575_0011

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

White

Heterogeneous finish

JDS-11 - B

10059575_0019

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous base

JDS-12

10059575_0012

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-13

10059575_0013

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Gray

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Katelyn Stewart (19)

Page 2 of 3P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10059575Customer: Mabbett & Associates 1442 Duke St Alexandria, VA 22314

Analysis:

Date Received:

David Nelson

PLM

08/12/2024

Project: DHM- Stonewall Jackson/R202001.005 Date Reported: 08/19/2024

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

JDS-14

10059575_0014

First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Tan

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-15

10059575_0015

First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Tan

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

JDS-16

10059575_0016

First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved, Crushed

Tan

Heterogeneous single layer plaster

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Katelyn Stewart (19)

Page 3 of 3P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Scientific Analytical Institute 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407

Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.3313 www.sailab.com /ab@sailab.com

Company Contact Information Company: Mabbett & Associates Contact: David Nelson

Address: 1442 Duke Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Phone [j]: (703) 963-5540

Fax0:

Email [j]: clnelson@mabbett.com

Billin2'.Invoice Information Turn Around Times Company: Mabbett & Associates 90 Min. • 48 Hours • Contact: Tasnia Tasnim 3 Hours • 72 Hours • Address: 105 Central Street Stoneham, MA 02180 6 Hours • 96 Hours •

12 Hours D 120 Hours Iii 24 Hours D 144+Hours D

PO Number:

Project Name/Number: DHM- Stonewall Jackson/R202001.005

Lab Use Only 1 0 11 r-f] Lab Order ID: __ .:....U_')-=--.__:_ '1 _ Client Code: -------

Asbestos Test Types

PLM EPA 600/R-93/116 [!]

(PLM) Positive stop • PLM Point Count 400 (PT4) • PLM Point Count I 000 (PTM) • PCM NlOSH 7400-A Rules (PCM) • B Rules (PCB) D TWA(PTA) •

TEM AIIBRA (AIIB) •

TEM Level Il (LIT) •

TEM NIOSH 7402 (TN!) •

TEM Bulk Qualitative (TBL) D TEM Bulk Chatfield (TBS) • TEM Bulle Quantitative (TBQ) • TEM Wipe ASTM D6480-05 D TEM Microvac ASTM D5755-02 • TEM Water EPA 100.2 (TWI) • Other: •

Sample ID# Description/Location Volume/ Area Comments

JDS-01 Second Floor - Small Attic - Wa11 Plaster

JDS-02 Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

JDS-03 Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

JDS-04 Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

JDS-05 Second Floor - Small Attic - Wall Plaster

JDS-06 Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

JDS-07 Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

JDS-08 Second Floor - Small Attic - Roof Tar Paper

JDS-09 Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

JDS-10 Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

JDS-11 Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

Ar, . -- "Ill'.,..

I ......, ~>~ea LJ - - --.

II - _..__,1

1,.,.., , Total# of S

6 --p

Daterrime

6/ 11-.

l,J.:Ji)

Page_1_of_2_ A-F-017

Sample ID#

JDS-12

JDS-13

JDS-14

JDS-IS

JDS-16

Scientific Analytical Institute 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407

Phone: 336.292.3888 Fax: 336.292.3313 www.sailab.com lab@sailab.com

Description/Location Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

Second Floor - Ceiling Plaster Near Attic Hatch

First Floor - Waiting Room Chimney mortar

Lab Use Only 1~ 7 s- Lab Order ID: _____ _ Client Code: ______ _

Volume/Area Comments

Page 2 C A-f-017

APPENDIX B

Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) Lead Paint Chip Laboratory Report and Chain-of-Custody

Analysis for Lead Concentration in Paint Chips by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

EPA SW-846 3050B/6010C/7000B

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10059576Customer: Mabbett & Associates 1442 Duke St Alexandria, VA 22314

Analysis:

Date Received:

David Nelson

PBP

08/12/2024

Project: DHM - Stonewall Jackson/R2020001.005 Date Reported: 08/19/2024

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes

Concentration (ppm)

Concentration (% by weight)

Mass (g)

JDS-1L

10059576_0001

Mechanical Room-At Entrance to Crawl Space-Clapboard

190000.0665 1.9%

JDS-2L

10059576_0002

Mechanical Room-At Entrance to Crawl Space-Clapboard

650000.0542 6.5%

JDS-3L

10059576_0003

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Brick

91000.1048 0.91%

JDS-4L

10059576_0004

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Brick

230000.0713 2.3%

JDS-5L

10059576_0005

Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Drywall Wall

170000.0666 1.7%

Disclaimer: Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed on analytical results. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the AIHA ELPAT program. ELPAT Laboratory ID: 173190. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. The quality control samples run with the samples in this report have passed all EPA required specifications unless otherwise noted. RL: (Report Limit for an undiluted 50ml sample is 4µg Total Pb).

Matthew Caffey (5)

Page 1 of 1L-F-021 r17 2/13/2027 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Sc'·entific Analytical Institute b NC 27407 4604 Dundas Dr. Greens oro, Phone: 336,292.3888 Fax: 336:292.3313 'lab com lab@sa1lab.com www.sa1 •

Lab Use Only S'° q S1 0 Lab Order ID: ....l.-~~--- Client Code: _____ _

\ Contact Information ' Company Name: Mabbett & Associates

Address: 1442 Duke Street Alexandria, Virginia 113 \4

, Billing/Invoice Information I

Company: Mabbett & Associates

Address: \ OS Central Street Stoneham, MA 02 l 80

Contact: Tasnia Tasnim

Contact: David Nelson Phone Iii: 781 - 275 - 6050 x 352

Phone Iii: 781 - 275 - 6050 x 105 Fax0:

Fax0: EmailLJ:

Email Iii: dnelson@mabbett.com

PO Number: Turn Around Times Project Name/Number: DHM - Stonewall Jackson/R2020001.005 3 Hours • 72 Hours •

6 Hours • 96 Hours • Lead Test es 12 Hours • 120 Hours 0 Paint Chips by Flame AA Ii] Soil by Flame AA 0

BP BS Other 0 24Hours • 144+ Hours • 48 Hours •

Sample ID# Description/Location Volume/ Area Comments

JDS-lL Mechanical Room-At Entrance to Crawl Space-Clapboard Chip White Paint

JDS-2L Mechanical Room-At Entrance to Crawl Space-Clapboard Chip White Paint

JDS-3L Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Brick Chip White Paint

JDS-4L Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Brick Chip White Paint

JDS-SL Mechanical Room-Near Entrance to Crawlspace-Drywall Wall Chip White Paint

• f ,X -.I!! tfl8U

'1>._Cv~ , ,--,\

. ...I \ j ----'~ L• .. - -jl -... ,.,.

. t=otal Number of Samples , A-F-020 EXP: 2/412021

I Recewe k: I Date/fime

Pagel

APPENDIX C

Sample Locations on Floor Plans

	2024-09-03T13:42:30-0400
Michael F. Delaney

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Sep 30, 2026.