Attachment 3 ANNEXES_JOBYFG FOWAN-DWDM_10Mar2025 FINAL v1-0.pdf

CUI

Annexes for

Royal Jordanian Air Force Fiber Optic Wide Area Network Transmission Node Upgrades

10 March 2025 Version 1.0

Prepared by United States Army Communications-Electronics Command (CECOM)

Security Assistance Management Directorate (SAMD) Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland

Controlled by: Communications-Electronics Command Controlled by: Security Assistance Management Directorate CUI Category(ies): OPSEC, CRIT Limited Dissemination Control: REL TO USA, JOR POC: Lisa Marino, 520-671-1739

ANNEXES

v1.0

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Table of Contents

Annex A. – FIBER TESTS USING FLS AND FPM TEST SET

Annex B. – OTDR TEST EQUIPMENT

Annex C. – CLIENT INTERFACES - GENERAL TRAFFIC AND DETAILS

Annex D. – UPGRADING RJAF TRANSMISSION NODES (JBSP)

Annex E. – STANDARDS TO BE SUPPORTED

Annex F. – ACRONYMS

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Annex A. – FIBER TESTS USING FLS AND FPM TEST SET

Test Equipment: EXFO FLS-600 and FOT-600.

# LINK NAME DISTANCE

(KM)

LOSS in (dB) using Laser source and Power meter

Notes

CORE (1) CORE (2)

1 SITE 18- SITE 19 35.539 25 25 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

2 SITE 19- SITE 20 9.23 7.2 8.5 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

3 SITE 20- SITE 21 36.478 15.5 13.5 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

4 SITE 21- SITE 22 21.535 13.6 11.3 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

5 SITE 22- SITE 17 69.373 21.8 20.7 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

6 SITE 17- SITE 16 35.741 13.4 13.4 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

7 SITE 16- SITE 15 17.008 9.2 20 Based on the big differences in losses for core (2) in laser/power reading and the OTDR, we suggest to have a margin of (6) dB. The OTDR test is in one direction, therefore it seems there is a problem (high losses) in termination or the couplers at (Site 15) ODF and we appreciate any suggestion from the expert companies in this issue.

8 SITE 17- SITE 6 61.242 21.4 21.9 A margin of (6) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link due to its distance.

9 SITE 6- SITE 7 33.709 15.5 14.5 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

10 SITE 7- SITE 8 31.552 22 18 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

(KM)

LOSS in (dB) using Laser source and Power meter

Notes

11 SITE 8- SITE 9 34.248 28.7 27.5 A margin of (7) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link due to the previous (historical) and registered fiber cuts for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

12 SITE 9- SITE 10 21.691 20 17 A margin of (7) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link due to previous (historical) and registered fiber cuts for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

13 SITE 10- SITE 11 6.56 8 8 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

14 SITE 10- SITE 12 17.829 25.2 27.5 Very bad old ITU-T G.652A fiber link which had been installed from 90’s, therefore RJAF is looking to add a margin of (7) dB for the losses mentioned in ‘red’ for this link taking into account the bad/incomplete fiber trace in the OTDR test.

15 SITE 12- SITE 13 27.935 20.5 19 Very bad old ITU-T G.652A fiber link which had been installed from 90’s, therefore RJAF is looking to add a margin of (7) dB for the losses mentioned in ‘red’ for this link taking into account the bad/incomplete fiber trace in the OTDR test.

16 SITE 13- SITE 14 7.858 9.3 15 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link. RJAF had accepted the (15) dB losses for Core (2) taking into account the OTDR test reading is far away from this value.

17 SITE 18- SITE 13 19.111 24.8 24.7 A margin of (6) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link due to previous (historical) and registered fiber cuts for this old ITU-T G.652A fiber link.

18 SITE 6- SITE 5 63.095 21.1 20.5 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link

19 SITE 5- SITE 3 71.849 20.9 19.7 A margin of (6) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link.

20 SITE 3- SITE 2 98.54 24 27.3 A margin of (6) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link due to long distance for fiber link in spite of the very minimum fiber cuts regarding it

21 SITE 2- SITE 1 17.447 10.5 10

A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

(KM)

LOSS in (dB) using Laser source and Power meter

22 SITE 3- SITE 4 4.108 6 7 A margin of (7) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for this link due to future considerations 23 SITE 14- SITE 15 34.8549 13 10 A margin of (5) dB should be added for the losses mentioned for

NOTES:

1. RJAF had considered the losses in (dB) for each link based on the laser source and power meter test as a reference for the following reasons:

a. The laser source/power meter test had taken into account the attenuation (losses) for the complete link of the fiber including the two-end coupling and patch cords…etc.

b. The OTDR test was considered as a guidance for the current situation for these fiber links and to provide any useful information about these links such as distance, reflective and non-reflective events and the total losses from one end (one- direction test) etc. The OTDR testing results are shown in Annex B.

2. RJAF had compared the results of the (laser/power) test devices with the (laser/power) reading on the current working Ericsson node because these tests were built on the active fiber cores that are used by these nodes

3. RJAF had taken into considerations a margin of loss in the fiber links between (5-7) dB based on the following reasons:

a. The number of Historical and previous fiber cuts that is registered for each fiber link.

b. The distance of each fiber link.

c. The deviation and uncertainty in the test of these fiber links based on the test equipment and the technician’s skills.

d. The expected fiber cuts in future due to the infrastructure projects inside Jordan.

e. The fiber class or type.

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

4. Finally, one of the fiber cores for (SITE 16- SITE 15) link had big difference between the OTDR test reading (guidance) and the laser/power meter test reading, we assume that the problem is in the termination or the coupling for (SITE 15).

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

Annex B. – OTDR TEST EQUIPMENT

# Link between sites Distance

(Km) Total Loss (dB)

Average Loss (dB/km)

ORL

(dB)

Pulse Width

Time (sec)

FIBER Cable CLASS

1 Sites (18-19) CORE (1) 35.539 20.99 0.59 <30.24 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 2 Sites (18-19) CORE (2) 35.524 20.04 0.564 32.78 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 3 Sites (19-20) CORE (1) 9.23 2.744 0.297 < 28.78 275ns 30 ITU-T G.652D 4 Sites (19-20) CORE (2) 9.227 4.613 0.5 < 29.42 275ns 30 ITU-T G.652D 5 Sites (20-21) CORE (1) 36.478 13.405 0.367 32.39 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 6 Sites (20-21) CORE (2) 36.478 10.888 0.298 <28.64 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 7 Sites (21-22) CORE (1) 21.535 9.128 0.424 <28.85 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 8 Sites (21-22) CORE (2) 21.533 6.122 0.284 <28.76 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 9 Sites (22-17) CORE (1) 69.373 16.787 0.242 <29.80 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 10 Sites (22-17) CORE (2) 69.363 15.671 0.226 <30.59 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 11 Sites (17-16) CORE (1) 35.741 9.95 0.278 <29.92 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D WITH A

SMALL PART OF ITU-T

G.652A

12 Sites (17-16) CORE (2) 35.741 9.92 0.264 <28.71 1µs 60 ITU-T G.652D WITH A

SMALL PART OF ITU-T

G.652A

13 Sites (16-15) CORE (1) 17.008 4.881 0.287 <29.38 275ns 30 ITU-T G.652D WITH A

SMALL PART OF ITU-T

G.652A

14 Sites (16-15) CORE (2) 17.008 4.885 0.287 <29.78 275ns 15 ITU-T G.652D WITH A

SMALL PART OF ITU-T

G.652A

15 Sites (17-6) CORE (1) 61.073 15.186 0.249 <28.87 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 16 Sites (17-6) CORE (2) 61.242 15.886 0.259 <29.44 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 17 Sites (6-7) CORE (1) 33.709 10.47 0.311 31.94 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 18 Sites (6-7) CORE (2) 33.701 9.318 0.276 <29.36 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

# Link between sites Distance (Km)

Total Loss (dB)

Average Loss (dB/km)

ORL

(dB)

Pulse Width

Time (sec)

FIBER Cable CLASS

19 Sites (7-8) CORE (1) 31.552 17.468 0.554 <31.71 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 20 Sites (7-8) CORE (2) 31.555 13.126 0.416 31.65 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 21 Sites (8-9) CORE (1) 34.248 24.472 0.715 < 32.18 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 22 Sites (8-9) CORE (2) 34.235 23.043 0.673 < 30.39 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 23 Sites (9-10) CORE (1) 21.691 15.373 0.709 33.14 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 24 Sites (9-10) CORE (2) 21.688 11.748 0.542 <29.68 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 25 Sites (10-11) CORE (1) 6.56 4.612 0.699 <29.93 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 26 Sites (10-11) CORE (2) 6.56 4.87 0.738 <30.08 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 27 Sites (10-12) CORE (1) 17.829 19.322 1.084 <32.53 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 28 Sites (10-12) CORE (2) 17.84 21.02 1.178 <32.03 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 29 Sites (12-13) CORE (1) 27.904 17.579 0.63 33.14 2.5µs 90 ITU-T G.652A 30 Sites (12-13) CORE (2) 27.935 12.478 0.45 31.76 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 31 Sites (18-13) CORE (1) 19.108 21.04 1.1 <31.06 500ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 32 Sites (18-13) CORE (2) 19.111 20.901 1.09 <30.92 500ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 33 Sites (13-14) CORE (1) 7.858 4.9 0.624 <30.91 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652D 34 Sites (13-14) CORE (2) 7.857 4.21 0.536 <29.87 275ns 90 ITU-T G.652D 35 Sites (5-6) CORE (1) 63.095 15.112 0.24 <29.95 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 36 Sites (5-6) CORE (2) 63.089 14.012 0.222 <29.11 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 37 Sites (5-3) CORE (1) 71.849 14.83 0.206 <29.72 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 38 Sites (5-3) CORE (2) 71.84 14.66 0.204 31.1 1µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 39 Sites (3-2) CORE (1) 98.54 21.37 0.217 <28.9 2.5 µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 40 Sites (3-2) CORE (2) 98.54 25.01 0.255 <26.17 2.5 µs 90 ITU-T G.652D 41 Sites (2-1) CORE (1) 17.447 5.921 0.339 <27.86 275ns 60 ITU-T G.652D 42 Sites (2-1) CORE (2) 17.447 5.633 0.323 <27.64 275ns 60 ITU-T G.652D 43 Sites (3-4) CORE (1) 4.108 1.345 0.327 <29.82 275ns 8 ITU-T G.652D 44 Sites (3-4) CORE (2) 4.108 2.196 0.535 <29.56 275ns 15 ITU-T G.652D 45 Sites (14-15) CORE (1) 34.8575 16.691 0.479 <26.47 100ns 90 ITU-T G.652A 46 Sites (14-15) CORE (2) 34.8549 13.278 0.381 <26.01 100ns 90 ITU-T G.652A

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

1. RJAF had used for the first time a new brand EXFO FTB-2 Platform OTDR with FTBx-750C-SM1-EA module that had SC/APC interface. The test included a three meter (3m) (APC/UPC) jumper cable patch cord and a new five hundred meter (500m) launch cable with (SC/UPC-FC/UPC) since RJAF had used FC/UPC interface for the ODF.

2. The average or maximum splice loss is not mentioned in the table.

3. RJAF recommends to incorporate a (5-7) dB margin for each link based on the laser and power test outlined in Annex A taking into account the past registration of the fiber cuts and to consider any fiber cuts and splicing in the future in addition to any tolerance or deviation in the fiber test.

4. The highlighted ‘red’ reading shows the bad reading for the very old fiber cables (ITU-T G.652A) installed from the 90’s. The ‘yellow’ highlighted shows the reading (attenuation) above (0.3dB/km) for both ITU-T G.652A and G.652D fiber cable. The highlighted ‘green’ reading shows the attenuation below (0.3dB/km) for both ITU-T G.652A and G.652D fiber cables.

5. The ITU-T G.652A fiber cables had been installed from the 90’s except the sites (17-6) link which had been installed in (2006-2007).

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

Annex C. – CLIENT INTERFACES - GENERAL TRAFFIC AND DETAILS

C1.1 General Traffic for sites that contain 100G optical lines and ROADM (The detailed matrix is shown below (C2. Detailed matrix))

# site 10 GE STM-

64/10GE*

Op. GE EL.

FE/GE

STM-16 STM-4 STM-1

1 Site 13* - (1) Reserved 10 15 7 - - 2 Site 18 1 (2) Reserved 15 15 3 - - 3 Site 19* 3 (3) Reserved 15 15 8 - 3 4 Site 20 1 (1) Reserved 10 15 3 - - 5 Site 21 - (1) Reserved 4 4 3 - - 6 Site 22 - (2) Reserved 6 6 2 - - 7 Site 17 1 (2) Reserved 10 15 4 - - 8 Site 16 1 (1) Reserved 10 15 2 - - 9 Site 15 - (1) Reserved 4 4 2 - - 10 Site 14 2 (1) Reserved 25 15 2 - 16 11 Site 6 1 (1) Reserved 8 8 3 - 2 12 Site 7 - (1) Reserved 6 6 2 - - 13 Site 8 - (1) Reserved 6 6 2 - 2 14 Site 9 - (1) Reserved 6 6 2 - 1 15 Site 10 1 (2) Reserved 10 15 5 1 3 16 Site 12 - (1) Reserved 4 6 2 - - 17 Site 11 2 (1) Reserved 10 10 1 1 - 18 Site 5 2 (1) Reserved 10 10 2 - - 19 Site 3 3 (1) Reserved 8 8 2 1 4 20 Site 2 - (1) Reserved 6 6 2 - - 21 Site 1 1 (2) Reserved 8 8 1 - 5 22 Site 4 3 (1) Reserved 10 8 - 1 -

NOTES

1. All site 19 and site 13 clients are distributed using two nodes (platforms) or one suitable platform. In case of using two adjacent platforms at each site (19, 13), RJAF suggests to have an optical (400G) grey connectivity between these adjacent platforms that can be expanded in future to (800G).

2. The STM-64/10GE interfaces shall be allocated for now (reserved) and can be used in future as 10GE client or as an optical line for (Daughter equipment) based on the available bandwidth in each optical line and the installing of new wavelengths in future carrying (100G) or even more, no XFP is required for now.

3. The optical SFPs for STM-16 at each site as shown below in details.

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

4. The optical SFPs for STM-4 at each site as shown below in details.

5. The optical SFPs for STM-1 at each site as shown below in details.

6. The optical interfaces for 10GE and 1GE are short haul up to (15 KM)

7. Most of the 10GE physical interfaces are not fully bandwidth utilized for the current RJAF scenario as shown in tables (2.5.3) and (2.5.4) below, but they shall be fully or better utilized in future after adding new wavelengths each carrying at least (100G) as shown in (Annex D, figures (2,3)) or even more and after the immigration from (SDH) domain to packet domain.

8. Few of the 1GE physical interfaces will be fully bandwidth or capacity utilized regarding the current RJAF scenario (traffic) shown in table (C1.1/C1.2). RJAF will use and utilize these interfaces based on the available or remaining bandwidth after carrying the SDH traffic on these new platforms that considered the first priority (carrying the current RJAF SDH network), but they shall be better utilized in future after adding new wavelengths each carrying at least (100G) as shown in Annex D or more such as (200G) and after the immigration from (SDH) domain to packet domain. The number of these physical interfaces just represents the number of the physical clients currently exist in addition to the physical interfaces that might be added at each main site.

9. RJAF requests in future the availability to transfer these requested client’s interfaces mentioned above to (daughter equipment) connected with the main platform using (1/10/100) GE optical line so we can segregate the client interfaces and the optical lines in the main platform to have better utilization of the main platform in term of the expansion on the optical network (new added main sites).

C1.2 General Traffic for sites that have or use 100G optical lines without

ROADM

# site 10 GE STM-

64/10GE

Op.GE EL.

FE/GE

STM-16 STM-4 STM-1

1 Site 25 1 (2) Reserved 8 8 - - - 2 Site 24 1 (2) Reserved 20 10 - - -

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

1. RJAF suggests to have or install a compact or smaller platform at these two sites regarding the one that will be used for the sites mentioned in table (1.1) and without ROADM (just 100G optical lines).

2. Same notes mentioned above (2,6,7 and 8) excluding the comments and notes of the SDH because there is no SDH interfaces at these sites.

C1.3 General Traffic for site that has or use 10G optical lines (daughter equipment).

# site 10 GE STM-

64/10GE

Op.GE EL.

FE/GE

STM-16 STM-4 STM-1

1 Site 23 - - 15 25 - - -

NOTE:

1. RJAF suggests to have or install daughter equipment at this site connected to site 23 to site 19 with the above interfaces.

2. The ethernet physical interfaces will not be fully bandwidth utilized, they represent just the required clients with a total bandwidth not exceed (4-6)GE for the current requirements.

C2. Detailed Matrix regarding the main and additional sites mentioned in (C1.1,C1.2 and C1.3)

C2.1 STM-1 Links (point to point connection)

Traffic link number

Source Destination Number of Links

Protection Requirement

1 site 14 site 1 3 (S1.1) YES

2 site 14 site 3 2 (S1.1) YES

3 site 14 site 6 2 (S1.1) YES

4 site 14 site 8 2 (S1.1) YES

5 site 14 site 9 1 (S1.1) YES

6 site 3 site 1 2 (S1.1) NO

7 site 14 site 19 3 (S1.1) YES

8 site 14 site 10 3 (S1.1) YES

TOTAL NUMBER OF (STM-1) LINKS: 18

C2.2 STM-4 Links (point to point connection)

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

Traffic link number

Source Destination Number of Links

Protection Requirement

1 site 3 site 4 1 (L4.2) NO

2 site 11 site 10 1 (L4.2) NO

TOTAL NUMBER OF (STM-4) LINKS: 2

C2.3 STM-16 Links (point to point connection)

Traffic link number

Source Destination Number of Links

Protection Requirement

NOTES

1 site 1 site 2 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 2 site 2 site 3 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 3 site 3 site 5 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 4 site 5 site 6 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 5 site 6 site 7 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 6 site 7 site 8 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 7 site 8 site 9 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 8 site 9 site 10 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 9 site 10 site 11 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 10 site 10 site 12 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 11 site 12 site 13 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 12 site 13 site 14 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 13 site 15 site 16 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 14 site 16 site 17 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 15 site 17 site 22 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 16 site 22 site 21 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 17 site 21 site 20 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 18 site 20 site 19 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 19 site 19 site 18 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 20 site 18 site 13 1 (L16.2) NO Note 1 21 site 13 RJAF Core network

(SEE FIGURE

1)

4 (L16.2) NO Note 2

22 site 19 RJAF Core network

(SEE FIGURE

1)

6 (L16.2) NO Note 2

23 site 10 RJAF Core network (SEE

FIGURE 1)

2 (L16.2) NO Note 2

24 site 17 T77 (metro site) 1 (L16.2) NO Added to the matrix

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

25 site 17 site 6 1 (L16.2) NO

26 site 14 site 15 1 (L16.2) NO Added to the matrix 27 site 20 site 18 1 (L16.2) NO Added to the matrix 28 site 21 JW1 (CORE

SITE)

1 (L16.2) NO

TOTAL NUMBER OF (STM-16) LINKS: 37

1. These interfaces represent the existing links for RJAF SDH Ericsson nodes that will be treated as clients for the new platforms (nodes) so RJAF Ericsson nodes can see each other and- operate normally through these new platforms to ease the future immigrations From SDH toward Packet technology.

2. These represent future client that need to be reserved in future to be connected with other RJAF SDH core sites (Directions/degree) through the new platforms with ROADM.

C2.4 Optical GE and Electrical FE/GE interfaces

C2.4.1. As shown in the general traffic routing tables (C1.1, C1.2 and C1.3) mentioned above, the traffic can be routed anywhere between the mentioned interfaces (sites) based on the following:

C2.4.1.1. The services (EPL/EVPL/E-TREE/ELAN/EVLAN) and MPLS-TP (tunnels and services) that must meet all L2 traffic specifications mention at (3.

RJAF SPECFICATIONS) and ethernet standard mentioned at Annex E.

C2.4.1.2. The available bandwidth that remaining after carrying the SDH interfaces (current RJAF SDH network) based on note (8) for table (C1.1) above regarding the current requirements (RJAF decision for using and utilizations).

C2.4.2 The possibility to use the 1GE interface as an optical line to connect an external (Daughter equipment) in future for multi-purposes.

C2.5 10GE/STM-64 Links

C2.5.1 As mentioned above (note.2 for table (C1.1)) the STM-64 interfaces are reserved without XFP and can be used in future as 10G client or can be connected with external small muxes or platform (daughter equipment) for more

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the expansion or to connect an access site regarding the main sites mentioned at tables (C1.1 and C1.2)

C2.5.2. All these reserved interfaces will not be used at the same time, the reserved one shall be used based on any future request based on the available (current) bandwidth for the current scenario or after future optical link upgrading (newly added optical wavelengths with 100G or more).

C2.5.3 10GE links for the main sites.

Traffic link number

Source Destination Number of Links

Protection requirement

NOTES (Utilization)

1 Site 4 Site 3 1 NO B.W 5G 2 Site 3 Site 1 1 NO B.W 5G 3 Site 3 Site 5 1 NO B.W 5G 4 Site 5 Site 6 1 NO B.W 5G 5 Site 4 Site 11 1 YES B.W 2G 6 Site 11 Site 14 1 YES B.W 2G 7 Site 4 Site 14 1 YES B.W 5G 8 Site 19 Site 18 1 YES B.W 2G 9 Site 19 Site 10 1 YES B.W 2G 10 Site 19 Site 17 1 YES B.W 5G 11 Site 20 Site 16 1 YES B.W 10G

1. The optical interfaces should be short haul (up to 10km).

2. Most of the 10GE physical interfaces are not fully bandwidth utilized for the current RJAF scenario as shown in tables (C2.5.3) and (C2.5.4), but they shall be fully or better utilized in future after adding new wavelengths each carrying (100G) or more as shown in Annex D and after the immigration from (SDH) domain to packet domain and based on the available bandwidth for the optical links taking into account that the fiber installation between sites (14-15) will enhance the available bandwidth.

3. New wavelengths each one carrying (100G) as shown in Annex D shall be added in future to enhance the matrix utilization and adding new client interfaces using additional daughter equipment.

C2.5.4 10GE Links for (25 and 24) sites.

Traffic link number

Source Destination Number of Links

Protection requirement

(Utilization)

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

1 Site 25 Site 3 1 NO B.W (5-10) G 2 Site 24 Site 14 1 NO B.W 5G

15 December 2024

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

Annex D. – UPGRADING RJAF TRANSMISSION NODES (JBSP)

Figure 1

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

Figure 2 – Future Express lambda added/dropped only at the purple sites for BS sites.

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without

Figure 3 – Future Express routed dropped only at the pink sites for RJAF Sites.

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

Annex E. – STANDARDS TO BE SUPPORTED

List of International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Standards to be Supported on Platform.

# STANDARD DESCRIPTION

1 G.652 Characteristics of a single-mode optical fiber cable 2 G.653 Characteristics of a dispersion-shifted single-mode optical fiber cable 3 G.654 Characteristics of a cut-off shifted single-mode optical fiber cable 4 G.655 Characteristics of a non-zero dispersion shifted single-mode optical fiber cable 5 G.656 Characteristics of a fiber and cable with non-zero dispersion for wideband optical transport 6 G.661 Definition and test methods for the relevant generic parameters of optical amplifier devices and subsystems

7 G.662 Generic characteristics of optical fiber amplifier devices and subsystems

8 G.663 Application related aspects of optical fiber amplifier devices and subsystems

9 G.664 General Automatic Power Shut-Down Procedures for Optical Transport Systems

10 G.665 Generic characteristics of Raman amplifiers and Raman amplified subsystems - Compliant for reverse pump Raman

11 G.666 Characteristics of PMD compensators and PMD compensating receivers - Compliant for eDC40G and eDC100G interfaces where the coherent receiver would be considered a Polarization Mode Dispersion Compensating Receiver

12 G.667 Characteristics of adaptive chromatic dispersion compensators - Compliant for eDC10G NGM (ADC Transmitter) and coherent eDC40G and eDC100G receivers (ADC Receivers )

13 G.671 Transmission characteristics of passive optical components - Compliant for DWDM C-Band, L-Band and CWDM transmission

14 G.680 Physical transfer functions of optical network elements, with the exception of AOWC and 2R regenerator (3R is being used)

15 G.681 Optical Surge

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

# STANDARD DESCRIPTION

16 G.691 Optical interfaces for single channel STM-64 and other SDH systems with optical amplifiers 17 G.692 Optical Interfaces for Multi channel Systems with

Optical Amplifiers 18 G.693 Optical interfaces for intra-office systems 19 G.694.1 Spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid 20 G.694.2 Spectral grids for WDM applications: CWDM frequency grid 21 G.695 Optical interfaces for coarse wavelength division multiplexing applications - PC 22 G.697 Optical monitoring for dense wavelength division multiplexing systems 23 G.698.1 Multichannel DWDM applications with single-channel optical interfaces.

24 G.698.2 Amplified multichannel DWDM applications with single- channel optical Interface.

25 G.701 Vocabulary of digital transmission and multiplexing and pulse- code modulation (PCM) terms. Compliant for the definitions that are applicable to interfaces used.

26 G.702 11-1988 - Digital hierarchy bit rates 27 G.703 11-2001 - Physical/electrical characteristics of hierarchical digital interfaces 28 G.704 10-1998 - Synchronous frame structures used at

1544, 6312, 2048, 8448 and 44 736 kbit/s hierarchical levels

29 G.706 04-1991 - Frame alignment and cyclic redundancy check (CRC) procedures relating to basic frame structures defined in Recommendation G.704

30 G.707 10-2000 - Network node interface for the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH)

31 G.709/Y.1331 Network node interface for the optical transport network (OTN)

32 G.736 Characteristics of a synchronous digital multiplex equipment operating at 2048 kbit/s

33 G.747 11-1988 -Second order digital multiplexing equipment operating at 6312 kbits/s and multiplexing three tributaries at 2048 kbits/s

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

34 G.772 Protected monitoring points provided on digital transmission systems. Partially Compliant. For the electrical interface rates described in G.772 that are supported in a 6500 MSPP switching/grooming context please refer to the response to the compliancy statement on G.703. Location of monitoring points:

Monitoring points are not offered at electrical (e.g.

coax) output interfaces or at points between an output and an input interface, e.g. at distribution frames.

However, troubleshooting and fault-isolation is not sacrificed since a rich suite of PM statistics is available on the specific port card interfaces that monitor in the receive direction:

• SONET path (P)/SDH path (P) entities - STS-1, STS-3c/VC4, STS-12c/VC4-4c, STS-24c/VC4-8c, STS-48c/VC4-16c, STS- 192c/VC4-64c, HO VC3, and LO VC3 payloads

• SONET VT path (VT-n)/SDH VC path (VC-m) for OCn circuit packs, STS1/LO VC3 (VT1.5/LO circuit packs only), STS1/HO VC3, and VC4 non-concatenated payloads, and low order VT/VC (VT1.5/VC11 and VT2/VC12) facilities In some specific cases, e.g. for DS1/DS3 facilities, Tx direction PMs are also provided.

35 G.773 Protocol suites for Q-interfaces for management of transmission systems; with exception to the application layer protocols (CMISE/ACSE/ROSE).

36 G.774 02-2001 - Synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) - Management information model for the network element view. Partially compliant.

- Administrative Units created as part of the STM-N creation are not directly managed as facilities but are implicitly monitored as part of the STM-N payload

- Tributary Unit Groups created as part of the VC creation are not directly managed as facilities but are implicitly monitored as part of the VC

- Administrative Units created as part of the STM-N frame are not directly managed, so a timeslot of the AU connection termination point (CTP) is not visible in Site Manager nor the EMS

- Tributary Unit / Tributary Unit Group CTP ID - TU/TUGs encapsulated within VCs are not directly managed and are not visible in Site Manager nor the

EMS

- AU and TUG entities are not directly managed and are not visible in Site Manager nor the EMS

37 G.780 07-1999 - Vocabulary of terms for synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) networks and equipment

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

38 G.781 07-1999 - Synchronization layer functions 39 G.783 10-2000 - Characteristics of synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) equipment functional blocks 40 G.784 07-1999 - Synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) management 41 G.798 Characteristics of optical transport network (OTN) equipment functional blocks 42 G.802.3ba 40GE/100GE support Evolution to all optical switch / wavelength manager 43 G.803 03-2000 - Architecture of transport networks based on the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) 44 G.805 Generic functional architecture of transport networks 45 G.806 Characteristics of transport equipment - Description

Methodology and Generic Functionality 46 G.807/Y.1302 Requirements for automatic switched transport networks (ASTN) - Partially Compliant.

47 G.808.1 Generic protection switching - Linear trail and sub network protection 48 G.809 Functional architecture of connectionless layer networks 49 G.810 08-1996 - Definitions and terminology for synchronization networks 50 G.811 Timing characteristics of primary reference clocks 51 G.812 Timing requirements of slave clocks suitable for use as node clocks in synchronization networks;

52 G.813 Timing characteristics of SDH equipment slave clocks

(SEC)

53 G.821 Error performance of an international digital connection operating at a bit rate below the primary rate and forming part of an Integrated Services Digital Network

54 G.823 The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are based on the 2048 Kb/s hierarchy

55 G.824 The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are based on the 1544 kbit/s hierarchy

56 G.825 The control of jitter and wander within digital networks which are based on the synchronous digital hierarchy

(SDH)

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

57 G.826 02-1999 - Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit rate digital paths. G.826 deals with the performance of PDH paths, and of those SDH paths using equipment designed prior to the adoption of ITU-T Rec. G.828 in March 2000. Since the 6500 platform was introduced after this date, this recommendation is not applicable.

Please refer to the compliancy statement on G.828.

58 G.827 Availability parameters and objectives for path elements of international constant bit-rate digital paths at or above the primary rate

59 G.828 Error performance parameters and objectives for international, constant bit-rate synchronous digital paths

60 G.829 Error performance events for SDH multiplex and regenerator sections

61 G.831 Management capabilities of transport networks based on SDH

- Partially Compliant. The 6500 platform craft interface (Site Manager) and EMS (OMEA) provides a list of available path connections in use, and shelf inventory, upon query at any given time. This can be used as input to a higher level (NMS/OSS) billing process both within a domain and between network operators to assist with the planning of routes and inventory control. SDH Section and Path Access Point Identifiers (APIs) are not provisionable via the Site Manager craft nor EMS, nor are the bytes within the SDH overhead visible to the user.

62 G.841 10-1998 - Types and characteristics of SDH network protection architectures

63 G.842 04-1997 - Interworking of SDH network protection architectures

64 G.870/Y.1352 Terms and definitions for Optical Transport Networks

(OTN).

65 G.871/Y.1301 Framework for Optical Transport Network Recommendations

66 G.872 Architecture of Optical Transport Networks 67 G.873.1 Optical Transport network (OTN) - Linear Protection 68 G.874 Management aspects of the optical transport network element 69 G.874.1 Optical Transport Network (OTN) Protocol-Neutral

Management Information Model or the Network Element View

70 G.875 Optical Transport Network (OTN) management information model for the network element view

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

71 G.911 Parameters and calculation methodologies for reliability and availability of fiber optic systems 72 G.957 Corresponding to optical interface parameters specifications for SDH equipment as defined under recommendations G.707, G.708, G.709, G.782, G.783 and line systems as described under recommendations G.958 and operating on single mode fibers conforming to recommendation G.652, G.653 and G.654

73 G.959.1 Optical Transport Networking Physical Layer Interfaces

74 G.975 Forward error correction for submarine systems 75 G.975.1 Forward error correction for high bit-rate DWDM submarine systems 76 G.7041/Y.1303 Generic Framing Procedure (GFP) 77 G.7042 Link Capacity Adjustment Scheme (LCAS) For Virtual

Concatenated Signals 78 G.7712/Y.1703 Architecture and specifications for data communication network 79 G.7713/Y.1704 Distributed call and connection management (DCM) 80 G.7713.2/Y.1704.2 Distributed call and connection management (DCM):

Signalling mechanism using GMPLS RSVP-TE 81 G.7713.3/Y.1704.3 Distributed call and connection management (DCM):

Signalling mechanism using GMPLS CR-LDP 82 G.7714/Y.1705 Generalized automatic discovery techniques for transport entities 83 G.7714.1/Y.1705.1 Protocol for Automatic Discovery Mechanism in SDH and OTN networks 84 G.7714.1/Y.1705.1 New Appendix VI - Usage of the Different Discovery

Mechanisms 85 G.7715/Y.1706 Architecture and requirements for routing in the automatically switched optical network (ASON) 86 G.7715.1/Y.1706.1 ASON Routing Architecture and requirements for link state protocols 87 G.7716 Control Plane Initialization, Reconfiguration &

Recovery 88 G.7718/Y.1709 Framework for ASON Management 89 G.8010 Architecture of Ethernet Layer Networks 90 G.8032 Ethernet Ring Protection 91 G.8040 GFP frame mapping into Plesiochronous Digital

Hierarchy (PDH) 92 G.8080/Y.1304 Architecture for the Automatically Switched Optical

Network (ASON)

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

93 G.8081/Y.1353 Terms and definitions for Automatically Switched

Optical Networks (ASON) 94 G.8110 MPLS layer network architecture

95 G.8110.1 Architecture of Transport MPLS (T-MPLS) Layer Network

96 G.8021 Characteristics of Ethernet transport network equipment functional blocks

97 G.8121 Characteristics of Transport MPLS (T-MPLS) Equipment

98 G.8021 Error performance parameters and objectives for multi- operator international paths within the Optical Transport Network (OTN)

99 G.8251 (G.OTN Jitter) The control of jitter and wander within the optical transport network (OTN)

100 G.8013/Y.1731 Operation, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks

101 Y.1564 Ethernet service activation test methodology

List of Others Standards to be Supported on Platform.

103 IEEE 802.1Q VLANs 104 IEEE 802.1ad Provider Bridging (Q-in-Q) 105 IEEE 802.1p Class of Service (CoS) prioritization 106 IEEE 802.3 Ethernet standards

107 IEEE 802.3ad Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP)

108 IEEE 802.1ag Connectivity Fault Management (CFM)

109 IEEE 802.3ah EFM Link-fault OAM

110 RFC 2544 Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices

111 RFC 5654 Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile

112 ETS 300 119 European Telecommunication Standard for Equipment Practice / Racks and Cabinets

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

Annex F. – ACRONYMS

List of acronyms.

# ACRONYM DESCRIPTION

1 ACC Army Contracting Command 2 AES Advanced encryption standard 3 ALMS Army Learning Management System 4 ALS Automatic laser shutdown 5 APG Aberdeen Proving Ground 6 API Application programming interface 7 ARP Address resolution protocol 8 AT Anti-Terrorism 9 ATP Acceptance test plan 10 BOM Bill of materials 11 B/OSS Billing and operations support systems 12 CAPEX Capital expenditure 13 CD Chromatic dispersion 14 CDC Colorless-directionless-contentionless 15 CDR Critical design review 16 CDRL Contract data requirements list 17 CM Configuration Management 18 CONUS Continental United States 19 COR Contracting Officer Representative 20 CTR Contractor 21 CSV Comma-seperated values 22 DC Direct current 23 DCN Data communication network 24 DDTC Directorate of Defense Trade Controls 25 DWDM Dense wavelength division multiplexer 26 ECP Engineering change proposal 27 EDFA Erbium-doped fiber amplifier 28 EoSDH, EoS Ethernet over SDH 29 ELAN Ethernet local area network 30 EPL Ethernet private line 31 ETREE Ethernet tree (root and leafs) 32 ETS European telecommunication standard

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

# ACRONYM DESCRIPTION

33 EVLAN Ethernet virtual private local area network 34 EVPL Ethernet virtual private line 35 ETSI European telecommunications standards institute

36 FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

37 FAT Factory acceptance test 38 FCAPS Fault, configuration, accounting or administration, performance, security 39 FE Fast ethernet

40 FEC Forward error correction 41 FFP Firm-Fixed Price 42 FIPS Federal information processing standard publication 140-2 43 FLS Fiber laser source 44 FMS Foreign Military Sales 45 FOWAN Fiber optical wide area network 46 FPM Fiber power meter 47 FRD Facilities Requirement Document 48 FSA Full system acceptance 49 GE Gigabit ethernet 50 GFE Government furnished equipment 51 GFI Government furnished information 52 GUI Graphical user interface 53 HW Hardware 54 IAW In accordance with 55 ICD Interface Control Document 56 I&CO Installation and Checkout 57 IEEE Institute of electrical and electronic engineers 58 IETF Internet engineering task force 59 ILS Integrated logistics support 60 IMS Integrated Master Schedule 61 IP Internet protocol 62 ISPM International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 63 ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations 64 ITU-T International telecommunications union 65 IUID Item unique indentification 66 JAF Jordan Armed Forces 67 JBSP Jordan Border Security Program

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

68 JTR Joint Travel Regulations 69 KM Kilometer 70 LAG Link aggregation 71 LCT Local craft terminal 72 LLDP Link layer discovery protocol 73 LOA Letter of Acceptance 74 LOP Level of protection 75 LPK Level of pack 76 MBB Make before break 77 MEF CE Metro ethernet forum carrier ethernet 78 MEL Master equipment list 79 MPLS-TP Multiprotocol label switching – transport profile 80 MSR Monthly status report 81 MTBF Mean time between failures 82 MTTR Mean time to repair 83 NDA Non-disclosure agreement 84 NMS Network management system 85 NBI North bound interface 86 NSN National stock number 87 OAM&P Operations, administration maintenance and provision 88 OCONUS Outside Continental United States 89 ODF Optical distribution frame 90 ODUks Optical data unit channel (k:0,1,2, 3 etc.)

91 OEM Original equipment manufacturer 92 O-E-O Optical-electrical-optical 93 OJT On-the-job training 94 OMS Optical multiservice 95 OPSEC Operations Security 96 OPEX Operational expenditure 97 OSC Optical supervisory channel 98 OSD Oriented strand board 99 OTDR Optical time-domain reflectometer 100 OTN Optical transport network 101 O-VPN Open virtual private network 102 PAC Post Award Conference 103 PCO Procurement Contracting Officer

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

104 PDF Portable document format 105 PM Project Manager 106 POC Point of Contact 107 POD Port of debarkation 108 POP Period of Performance 109 QA Quality Assurance 110 QAR Quality Assurance Representative 111 QUP Quantity unit pack 112 RFP Request for proposal 113 RFS Ready for service 114 PMD Polarization mode dispersion 115 PMR Program Management Review 116 PWS Performance Work Statement 117 REST API Representational State Transfer Application Programming

Interface 118 RFS Ready for service 119 RJAF Royal Jordanian Air Force 120 ROADM Reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexing 121 SAMD Security Assistance Management Directorate 122 SAN Storage area network 123 SAT System acceptance test 124 SD-FEC Soft decision forward error correction 125 SDH Synchronous digital hierarchy 126 SDN Software defined networking 127 SNCP Subnetwork connection protection 128 SONET Synchronous optical network 129 SP Shelf processor 130 SPO Smart packet optical platform 131 SRD System Requirements Document 132 SRR System Requirements Review 133 SSDD System/Subsystem Design Description 134 SSP System Safety Plan 135 STM Synchronous transport mode 136 TARP Threat Awareness and Reporting Program 137 TIM Technical Interchange Meeting

This document contains information sensitive to the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Distribution beyond Official US Government channels is not authorized without the express consent of the Government of the

138 TLA Temporary lodging assistance / Travel and living allowance 139 TLS Transport layer security 140 TOC Transfer of custody 141 TPP Test Plan and Procedure 142 TR Trouble Report/Trouble Reporting 143 USCECOM United States Army Communications-Electronics

Command 144 USG United States Government

145 VCRM Verification Cross Reference Matrix

146 VDD Version Description Document

147 VLLI Virtual link loss indicator 148 VPN Virtual private network 149 WAWF Wide area workflow 150 WPM Wood packaging material 151 WSS Wavelength selective switch 152 XML Extensible markup language