Attachment 3 - Air Compressor PPQ.pdf

PDF 212 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Compressor Maintenance Services
Solicitation number
FA500022Q0048
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a firm fixed price solicitation seeking air compressor maintenance services. The solicitation is seeking preventative maintenance and emergency/routine service repairs for air compressors and associated air dryers at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska. Responses to the past performance questionnaire are due no later than 2:00pm local time on August 1, 2022 and should be emailed to the points of contact provided. The questionnaire asks for details on relevant previous contracts over the past three years, including contract specifics, scope of work performed, number and size of air compressors serviced, and experience diagnosing and repairing air dryers.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

Past Performance Cover Letter/Questionnaire

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FA500022Q0048 AIR COMPRESSOR MAINTENANCE

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Questionnaire

TO: Whom It May Concern

We are currently participating in a proposal in response to the Government’s Request for Quote No. FA500022Q0048 for a firm fixed price contract on Air Compressor Maintenance Services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.

The Government will be evaluating contractors for this service based on several selection factors.

One of the key factors in the Government’s final decision is past performance. To assist the Government in its assessment of our past performance, we are required to identify previous contracts and clients who are familiar with our past performance. For the purpose of this questionnaire, past performance is defined as contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.

As one of our customers for past contracting work on , we are requesting that you complete the attached questionnaire regarding our past performance. This letter authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance as directed.

Your prompt attention in completing the attached questionnaire will ensure we receive full consideration in this competition. Please return the completed form to the Government’s point of contacts identified below, to arrive no later than 2:00 P.M. local Alaska Daylight Time on Monday, 1 August 2022.

Please use the point of contact information below to email the completed questionnaire:

Ms. Kimberly Knowlton at kimberly.knowlton.3@us.af.mil and Mr. Robert Peters at robert.peters.11@us.af.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.

(Signature and title of individual having the authority to sign for and legally bind the offeror.)

FA500022Q0048 – Attachment 3 mailto:kimberly.knowlton.3@us.af.mil mailto:robert.peters.11@us.af.mil

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A - CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: (Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference.)

Contractor Company Name: Address: Cage Code:

Duns Number:

Point of Contact: Telephone Number: Email Address:

SECTION B - CONTRACT SPECIFICS: (Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference.)

Contract Title:

Contract Number: Contract Type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.):

Period of Performance: Competitively Awarded Contract: (Yes/No)

Initial Contract Value: Current/Final Contract Value: Total Value:

Contractor being evaluated as Prime or Subcontractor?:

Description of Services:

Reason for Difference Between Initial & Current/Final Contract Costs, if any exists:

SECTION C - RESPONDENT INFORMATION: To be completed by each reference providing information in Sections C-F. Please send filled out PPQs to both Ms. Kimberly Knowlton at kimberly.knowlton.3@us.af.mil and Mr. Robert Peters at robert.peters.11@us.af.mil Name: Title: Company/Organization:

Physical Address (Street, City, State, Zip Code): Telephone Number (to include area code): Email Address:

Signature: Date:

mailto:kimberly.knowlton.3@us.af.mil mailto:robert.peters.11@us.af.mil

SECTION D: QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SCOPE OF CONTRACT

To be completed by each reference using checkmarks to indicate selection.

QUESTIONS YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Is your service contract for air compressor maintenance within the last 3 years?

2. Does your air compressor maintenance have emergency and routine service calls?

3. Do you have experience in diagnosing, reading error codes, etc. for maintenance and repair of air dryers associated with air compressors?

4. Age range of air compressor and associated air dryers serviced / maintained? (Select all that apply)

0 - 5 years

5 - 10 years 10 - 15 years 15 - 20 years 20+ years

5. What are the sizes and numbers of air compressors maintained? (Select all that apply and provide total number)

Reciprocating less than 40 hp

Rotary to 40 hp Rotary greater than 40 hp

Please state others if not listed:

6. Number of air compressor serviced / maintained? >120 100 – 120 80 – 100 <80

7. What is the frequency of maintenance? (Select all that apply)

Daily Monthy Quarterly

Annual

SECTION E - EVALUATION RATING DEFINITIONS:

RATING DEFINITIONS

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the requiring activity’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SECTION F - ASSESSED EVALUATION RATINGS:

To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section E. Please provide a check mark to indicate assessed rating for each question. An overall rating is requested for each of the major rated area (i.e Quality, Schedule, Management, Regulatory). Please describe in the remarks, any issues that may have influenced overall ratings which are not represented in the questions.

RATED AREAS RATINGS

1. QUALITY OF SERVICES Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Remarks (if necessary)

a. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to maintain air compressors maintenance outlined in your Performance Work Statement, Statement of Work, or equivalent requirements document?

b. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to proactively respond, recognize, resolve unanticipated difficulties, correct deficiencies, re-performance, or emergencies in the manner consistent with the contract’s quality control procedure?

c. How well did the contractor provide for sufficient and qualified manpower in the performance of this contract?

d. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to remain on schedule, meet specific response times, and scheduled time frames for completion of specific tasks while still providing quality service

Overall Rating for "Quality of Services"

2. SCHEDULE Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Remarks (if necessary)

a. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to maintain a schedule, meet specific response times, and adjust to varying work load?

b. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to provide CDRLS, reports, submittals, or other deliverables in a timely manner?

Overall Rating for "Quality of Schedule"

3. Management Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Remarks (if necessary)

a. How well would you rate the contractor's responsiveness of communication?

b. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to adapt to varying work situations?

c. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to identify problems, displayed initiative to provide solutions to those problems, and performed as a Team Member?

d. How well would you rate the contractor's ability to hire quality subcontractor's and successfully manage their work?

Overall Rating for "Management"

4. Regulatory Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Remarks (if necessary)

a. How would you rate the contractor's ability to adhere to OSHA guidelines for safety?

b. How would you rate the contractor's ability to adhere to environmental regulatory guidance?

c. How would you rate the contractor's ability to meet the requirements of FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting? (if applicable)

Overall Rating for "Regulatory"

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .