Attachment 2b COSR ASRS Maintenance.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- SP3300-24-Q-0057 ASRS Maintenance DLA Portsmouth
- Solicitation number
- SP3300-24-Q-0057
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
About this file
The document provided is a Contract Oversight Surveillance Report for a contract related to Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRS) Equipment maintenance at the DLA Logistics Agency Maritime location in Kittery, Maine. The report covers the evaluation period of the contract performance, with sections for documenting the surveillance methods used, overall surveillance evaluation, and COR/TPOC certification. The key details include:
The contract number and service, contract location, performance period, and evaluation period are provided. The contract service provider is not named. The surveillance methods used include direct observation, random sampling, 100% inspection, and validated customer complaints. The overall surveillance evaluation is provided, along with additional comments/notes to the Contracting Officer. The COR/TPOC certifies that the supplies or services provided by the Service Provider have been received and accepted.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SP330024Q0057_Amendment 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_0002_SP330024Q0057.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0002 SP330024Q0057.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 CDRL A001 Small Business Participation Quarterly Report.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 Attachment 4 Subcontracting Plan Includes Elements 1-15.docx | DOCX document | |
| SP330024Q0057_Amendment 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_0001 SP330024Q0057.pdf | ||
| TE 1.1 Contractor Personnel Security.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 PWS and Equipment List ASRS Maintenance.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Schedule of Supplies and Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2a QASP - POC Listing.docx | DOCX document | |
| TE 1.2 CAC Procedures (DLAM 1000.13 Effective 5 April 2022).docx | DOCX document | |
| SP3300-24-Q-0057.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 QASP.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
Contract Oversight Surveillance Report
1. Contract # / Service
2. Contract Location
3. Contract Performance Period
4. Evaluation Period
5. Contract Service Provider
6. Method(s) of Surveillance (check all that apply for this surveillance period) Requirement Surveillance Comments
Surveillance Methods Described -
- Direct Observation is the visual examination of processes and procedures by an evaluator who is physically present and watching individuals actually performing the work to determine whether the processes conform to the requirements.
- Random Sampling is correctly performed by selecting a statistically significant number of samples from a lot where all members of the lot have the same chance of being selected. Random Sampling is used to reduce the time and effort of validating conformance to requirements when a definable lot of significant size exists.
- 100% Inspection method evaluates all outputs of a particular requirement. Every item in a lot is evaluated for all or some of the characteristics in the specification. (Recommend if Lot Size is 25 or less)
- Validated Customer Complaints are customer complaints that prove to be valid upon subsequent investigation. They can be used as a trigger for conducting surveillances, and are included as a part of the surveillance report. When a valid complaint is received and included in a surveillance activity, strongly consider scheduling targeted follow up surveillance to ensure the problem has been corrected. These can prompt corrective actions, preventative action plans, and performance improvement plans.
7. Overall Surveillance Evaluation
8. Additional Comments / Notes to the Contracting Officer (Either positive or negative)
9. COR/TPOC Certification - I certify that the supplies or services provided by the Service Provider under the terms and conditions of this contract, have been received and accepted unless otherwise noted on this surveillance report.
Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments 10.0.2.20120224.1.869952.867557
| TextField1: Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRS) Equipment |
| TextField4: DLA Logistics Agency Maritime Portsmouth Kittery, ME |
| TextField2: |
| DateField1: |
| DateField2: |
| TextField3: |
| DirectObservation: 0 |
| RandomSampling: 0 |
| Inspection: 0 |
| Complaint: 0 |
| Other: 0 |
| Other_Field: |
| Requirement: 1. Was a preventative maintenance schedule submitted IAW with the contract ? |
| Requirement: 2. Was all preventative maintenance performed IAW submitted proposal and the OEM/Federal guidance? |
| Requirement: 3. Was all corrective maintenance performed IAW the OEM/Federal guidance? |
| Requirement: 4. Did the SP document and submit all work orders IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 5. Did the SP respond to all corrective maintenance in the required time IAW with the contract |
| Requirement: 6. Is the SP only using new or like new parts for repairs IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 7. Is the SP meeting all safety and environmental guidance IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 8. Is the SP meeting all the requirements of the contract? |
| SurveillanceComments: |
| Conforming: |
| Nonconforming: |
| Outstanding: 0 |
| VeryGood: 0 |
| TextField5: |
| SignatureField1: |
| SignatureField2: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .