ATTACHMENT 2 RELVANT CONTRACT REFERENCE SHEET.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Army Program Office – Information Advantage (APO-IA) Support - Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124924R0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

This document contains a template for offerors to provide details on relevant past performance contracts for a Department of the Army solicitation. Offerors must list prior contracts demonstrating experience with similar size, scope, and complexity to the Army Program Office – Information Advantage (APO-IA) Support services being procured. For each past performance reference, details must include the contract number and award/completion dates, original and final pricing, delivery schedules, points of contact, and an explanation of relevance. Offerors must also provide any cure notices, discrepancy reports, or corrective actions taken under prior contracts. The solicitation seeks information technology and management support services for the APO-IA and responses are due based on the solicitation number provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Army Program Office – Information Advantage (APO-IA) Support - Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATTACHMENT 5 TOTAL COMPENSATION PLAN FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE (TCPPE).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT 4 PRICE WORKSHEET UPDATED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 7 SAMPLE CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 6 DD 254 APO Information Advantage APO-IA signed.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 1 CONSENT FORM FOR THE RELEASE OF PART PERFORMANCE.docx DOCX document
W9124924R0001 APO-IA.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet

The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.

2. Price/Cost – original awarded AND final (or projected final, if contract is current).

3. Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).

4. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

5. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

6. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

7. Government or commercial technical representative or COR - Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given but not limited to such things as product/service similarity, product/service, size and complexity, contract type, contract environment, division of company proposing, and subcontractor interaction.

8. Narrative explanation on each contract listed describing the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or a No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may allow the offeror to be considered a Substantial Confidence or Satisfactory Confidence candidate.

9. Negative Performance Documentation. A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the offeror or proposed subcontractor.

10. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule. The contractor shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary.

1. Contract Number __________________________ Award Date________________________________ Contract type_______________________________

2. Completion Date/Delivery Schedule.

Original completion/delivery date ______________________________________________ Revised completion/delivery date ______________________________________________

3. Price/Cost – original awarded price__________________________________________

4. Modified Price/Cost - ____________________________________________________

5. Completion Date or Delivery Schedule – original AND final (or projected final, if the contract is current).

6. Changed Dates - ________________________________________________________

7. Contact Information - Address and telephone number for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity AND contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for the following:

8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________

9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO).

Address: _____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________

10. Government or commercial technical representative or COR.

Address: ____________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Fax Number: _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _______________________________________________________

11. Relevancy Description.__________________________________________________

12. Narrative explanation._________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

13. Negative Performance Documentation.______________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .