ATTACHMENT 2 - PFC QASP_IDIQ_FFP 2AUG2021.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MARFORSOC Prolonged Field Care Support IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- H92257-21-Q-0090
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) H92257-21-D-00##
Upload completed report (.pdf) to PIEE SPM Module NLT 10th of each QTR (Dec, Mar, Jun, Sep; PoP: 1Oct21-31Sep26)
ATTACHMENT 2 - 2 AUGUST 2021
**Method of Evaluation of CTR performance: per Services Delivery Summary in H92257-21-D-00XX**
Date: XX XXX XX
Site: CONUS locations (e.g., Wilmington NC, CamPen CA, LA, MO; Exercise site)
Contractor Site Lead:
Activity: MARFORSOC Prolonged Field Care Support for MRR / HSS
Contractor:
Assessment Conducted By: MARSOC COR – TBD
Instructions: Mark appropriate columns with Y or N, and an X for Quality Rating.
Y = is performing task N = is not performing task
Rating: 1= Unacceptable 2= Marginal 3= Satisfactory 4= Very Good 5= Excellent *Note: Justify / Support ratings other than Satisfactory with comments below.
Y N
QUALITY
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Service
1. Does the contractor’s performance conform to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards)?
2. Did the contractor meet the facility requirements identified in the SOW?
3. Did the contractor provide medical equipment and training aids?
4. Did the contractor provide Moulage support?
5. Were the training areas provided and available?
6. Did the contractor execute a culmination exercise on time?
7. Did the contractor provide exercise support personnel?
Schedule
8. Does the contractor accomplish tasks and delivery of products within schedule timelines, milestones, delivery schedules and administrative requirement?
9. Are requirements / deliverables completed in an accurate and timely manner, in compliance with SOW requirements?
10. Were vehicles available at the required dates and locations, with the appropriate equipment and support?
11. Did the contractor submit required security requirement on time?
Business Relations
12. Is the contractor oriented toward the customer?
13. Is interaction / communication between the contractor and the Government satisfactory or does it need improvement?
14. Did the contractor provide general support when needed?
15. Was proper exercise coordination conducted/completed to meet training requirements?
16. Were services provided in a timely manner, and complete?
17. Was the quality of problem identification and corrective action plans, if applicable, focused on customer satisfaction?
18. Did the contractor personnel exhibit reasonable and cooperative behavior?
Management of Personnel
19. Did the contractor select, retain, support, and ensure training over time as required, and replace, when necessary, any non-conforming personnel?
20. Did the contractor properly manage any sub-contractors that were in support?
21. Did all contractor personnel have the appropriate/required security clearance?
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) H92257-21-D-00##
Upload completed report (.pdf) to PIEE SPM Module NLT 10th of each QTR (Dec, Mar, Jun, Sep; PoP: 1Oct21-31Sep26)
ATTACHMENT 2 - 2 AUGUST 2021
**Method of Evaluation of CTR performance: per Services Delivery Summary in H92257-21-D-00XX**
JUSTIFY / SUPPORT RATINGS OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY. PROVIDE ANY OTHER SIGNIFICANT ISSUES, POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE, THAT INFORMS THE CONTRACTING OFFICER ON CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE. (Use additional pages as needed) COMMENTS:
Add your appropriate comments here…
I have discussed my assessment with the Contractor Site Lead.
COR Signature: Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .