Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire Sheet.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT940626QE013
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor performance for solicitation HT940626QE013, issued by the Defense Health Agency for Neonatologist and Neonatal Nurse Practitioner (NNP) coverage services at Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, NC.
The questionnaire requires references to assess the contractor across five key performance areas: Overall Fill Rate, On-Time Fill Percentage, Turnover Rate, and Replenishment Rate, each mapped to CPARS rating categories (Quality, Schedule, and Management). Performance is rated on a six-point scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with the ability to mark items Not Applicable. References must evaluate the contractor's ability to provide and retain qualified credentialed personnel, meet staffing timelines, maintain current credentialing and privileging packages, minimize personnel turnover and operational disruption, and plan for replacement candidates to cover absences. The completed questionnaire must be returned by 1000 Eastern Time on Wednesday, 15 July 2026 to derek.j.bell.civ@health.mil with "Solicitation HT940626QE013" in the subject line. The form includes sections for contracting activity information, contract details, complexity metrics (including FTE counts and facility type), and concludes with a summary section asking whether the reference would award another contract to the firm and whether the contract was terminated for default or cause.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HT940626QE013 - Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers - HT940626QE013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Work Statement (Amendment 1).docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Work Statement (Solicitation).docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Certification Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - HT940626QE013.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Past Performance Summary Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - Pricing Worksheet Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Employee Total Compensation Plan.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation HT940626QE013 Attachment 2
Past Performance Questionnaire
The Defense Health Agency is conducting an acquisition for the services noted below. The contractor has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation HT940626QE013 is for Neonatologist and Neonatal Nurse Practitioner (NNP) coverage services in support of Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, NC (NMCCL).
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than 1000, Eastern Time on Wednesday, 15 July 2026 via email to derek.j.bell.civ@health.mil. Please reference “Solicitation HT940626QE013” in the subject of the email.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Contractor):
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Contractor):
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services (included labor categories and number of FTEs/labor category):
MARKET SEGMENT
| Ancillary Services |
| Dental Services |
| Nursing Services |
| Physician Services |
| Medical Support Services |
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Number of Credentialed FTEs:
Number of Privileged FTEs:
Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
All information from here down shall be completed by the Reference POC. The Reference POC shall also verify the information completed by the Contractor and make any necessary corrections before signing this form.
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(NA) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified contracted personnel IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified contracted personnel remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed and retained qualified contracted personnel with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified contracted personnel on time IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying packages within established time frames IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified contracted personnel without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this contractor.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .