Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NH Guam - Neonatalogist / Neonatal Nurse Practitioner / Pediatric Hospitalist (24-Hr Coverage)
- Solicitation number
- HT941025R0003
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for RFQ HT941025R0003, which is seeking 24-hour non-personal services coverage for Neonatologists, Neonatal Nurse Practitioners, or Pediatric Hospitalists at US Naval Hospital Guam. The questionnaire must be completed by references and returned by January 28, 2025, to merlinda.m.labaco.civ@health.mil.
The PPQ requests detailed information about previous contracts including contract numbers, values, performance periods, and staffing levels. It uses a five-tier rating system (Exceptional to Unsatisfactory) to evaluate contractors in key performance areas including overall fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate. The questionnaire specifically focuses on the contractor's ability to provide and maintain qualified healthcare workers, submit accurate credentialing packages, and manage staff turnover and absences. This is noted as a new requirement for NH Guam with no incumbent contractor.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS) Updated.pdf | ||
| HT941025R0003 Preproposal Conference 14JAN25.pdf | ||
| RFP Compliance Checklist_Updated.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Letter of Intent Attachments 1-4.pdf | ||
| RFP Compliance Checklist.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP HT941025R0003.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Candidate Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ HT941025R0003
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Defense Health Agency is conducting a full and open competition for qualified sources capable of providing the following positions in accordance with FAR 13.500(c). The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
RFQ # HT941025R0003 is for non-personal services at US Naval Hospital Guam, Bldg. 50 Farenholt Rd., Agana Heights, Guam as follows:
Physician – Neonatologists (24-hour coverage) Nurse Practitioner – Neonatal (24-hour coverage) or Pediatric Hospitalist (24-hr coverage)
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and return via email no later than 28 January 2025 to merlinda.m.labaco.civ@health.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MARKET SEGMENT
| Ancillary Services |
| Dental Services |
| Nursing Services |
| Physician Services |
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Number of Credentialed FTEs:
Number of Privileged FTEs:
Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
Contractor performed on this contract as:
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified HCW’s IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified HCW’s remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed, and retained qualified HCW’s with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified HCW’s on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current, and accurate qualifying package for each HCW IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current, and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified HCWs without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract?
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause?
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .