Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire - Hotsy Maintenance and Repair.docx
DOCX document 99 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912GY-23-R-0004
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on a solicitation from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal. The solicitation seeks maintenance and repair services for Hotsy pressure washing stations and water reclamation equipment at Sierra Army Depot, with responses due by August 9, 2023. Offerors must provide at least three but no more than five completed past performance questionnaires from previous customers to be evaluated. The questionnaire asks customers to rate the contractor's performance on a scale of one to six on elements such as understanding requirements, problem resolution, resource management, schedule compliance, deliverable quality, cost control, and recommendation for future awards. Completed questionnaires should be returned to the Sierra Army Depot Contracting Office by the response due date.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS
Army Contracting Command – Sierra Army Depot, CA
The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past and present performance of offerors submitting quotes in response to W912GY-23-R-0004 – Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) for Maintenance and Repair Services of Hotsy Pressure Washing Stations and Water Reclamation Equipment. The information you provide will be instrumental in allowing the Government to evaluate how well the contractor performed under your contract(s).
a. Please complete all sections of the attached questionnaire. Include your name and title, organizational address, e-mail address, telephone, and fax number.
b. Include the contractor’s name and address, the title and/or description of the type of work performed, the award number, the value of the contract (including options), the award and completion date of the project and the type of award/solicitation.
c. Use the rating scale found on the bottom left corner of the questionnaire to rate each performance element.
d. Comments are encouraged and would be appreciated. The last page may be used if additional space is needed for comments. Clear handwritten responses are sufficient.
Due to time constraints, it is important that the questionnaire be completed and returned by the date quote is due August 9, 2023. Please submit in writing via email your response to the Contract Specialist Rhonda Long, email rhonda.a.long.civ@army.mil
Instructions - The Offeror must submit at least three (3), but not more than five (5) references. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to send the questionnaires to their customers and to ensure that they are received on time. Failure to submit questionnaires may result in no responsiveness and proposal will not be evaluated and considered for award.
Thank you for your time and participation.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
YOUR NAME & TITLE
YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL ADDRESS
TEL NO
FAX:
E-MAIL:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS
TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
| CONTRACT TYPE: | ||
| FIXED PRICE | COST + FEE | |
| COMPETITIVE | NON-COMPETITIVE |
SET-ASIDE
SEALED BID NEGOTIATED
CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:
| PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT |
| RATING |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| NA |
1. Contractor demonstrated a thorough understanding of technical requirements of the contract/task.
Comments:
2. Contractor anticipated/identified and resolved problems effectively.
Comments:
3. Contractor managed and directed resources (i.e., personnel, subcontractors, equipment, etc.) effectively.
Comments:
4. Rate the Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.
Comments:
6. Contractor met scheduled contract delivery dates.
Comments:
7. Contractor provided accurate, complete, and high-quality deliverables.
Comments:
8. Contractor complied with the terms of the contract.
Comments:
9. Contractor was diligent in forecasting and controlling contract cost.
Comments:
10. I would recommend award to this contractor again.
Comments:
| 1 |
| 0 – 25% of the time |
| Strongly Disagree |
| PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE TO: |
Army Contracting Command-SIAD Sierra Army Depot Contracting Office ATTN: Rhonda Long 74 C Street Building 60 Herlong, CA 96113 email: rhonda.a.long.civ@army.mil
| 2 |
| 26 – 40% of the time |
| Disagree |
| 3 |
| 41 – 55% of the time |
| Somewhat Disagree |
| 4 |
| 56 – 70% of the time |
| Somewhat Agree |
| 5 |
| 71 – 85% of the time |
| Agree |
| 6 |
| 86 – 100% of the time |
| Strongly Agree |
NA
No Knowledge of This Element
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .