_Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

Source Selection Information - see FAR 3.104 Attachment 2

Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC) Sigonella is currently evaluating competitive offers for four (4) trained professional facilitators to be assigned to CNREURAFCENT CHAPLAINS RELIGIOUS ENRICHMENT DEVELOPMENT OPERATION (CREDO), which falls under CNREURAFCENT Religious Ministries Program. The contractor shall assist CNREURAFCENT CREDO by providing four CREDO facilitators to assist the CREDO staff in providing direct facilitation of CREDO retreats/workshops, General Military Training Briefs (GMTs), Command Indoctrination Briefs and other training events.

You have been named as a point of contact for services previously provided by the contractor cited herein. Please provide the information requested in the questionnaire. The information you provide will become part of the source selection documentation; however, your name will not be released to any of the parties. Should you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mrs. Carmelita Saggese in Naples, Italy at Tel 0039 081-568-4210 or e-mail at carmelita.saggese2.ln@us.navy.mil . You may also contact Marie Hahn at 0039 081-568-3743 by telephone or email at marie.k.hahn2.civ@us.navy.mil with any questions.

(To be completed by NAVSUP FLC)

Contractor:

Address:

(To be completed by person to whom questionnaire is addressed):

1. Background Information

a. Name of person completing this questionnaire and position.

Name:

Tel No.

E-mail Address:

b. Contract No:

c. Description of service:

d. Period of Performance (all years):

e. Total value of the contract (all years):

mailto:carmelita.saggese2.ln@us.navy.mil%20.

mailto:marie.k.hahn2.civ@us.navy.mil

2. Please select a rating in answer to each of the following questions and provide comments as appropriate.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the customer’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1. How would you rate the quality of services received?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Comments:

2. How would you rate the timeliness of the services received?

3. How would you rate customer satisfaction?

4. To what extent did the contractor’s performance conform to the terms and conditions of the contract?

5. To what extent was the contractor reasonable and cooperative during performance (including cooperating with successor contractor, if applicable)?

6. Overall evaluation comments:

Signature and Date