_Attachment 1 Past Performance Information.pdf
PDF 154 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Credo Facilitators Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6817125Q0007
About this file
This is a past performance information template (Attachment 1) for RFQ N6817125Q0007 that allows contractors to provide details on up to three previous contract references. The template includes sections for contractors to enter contract numbers, procuring agency information, contract values, performance periods, and detailed work descriptions for each reference.
The template includes a comprehensive evaluation framework with defined relevancy ratings (Very Relevant, Relevant, Somewhat Relevant, Not Relevant) based on scope, magnitude, and complexity compared to the current solicitation requirements. Contractors must provide clear statements about contract completion, quality, timeliness, cost growth, and any performance issues for each reference. The form requires contractors to self-assess and justify the relevancy of each past performance reference using the provided definitions, where scope is defined as experience in PWS areas, magnitude refers to similar dollar values over a three-year period, and complexity relates to the degree of functions performed.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01 AMENDMENT 02 RFQ N6817125Q0007.pdf | ||
| 2.01 AMENDMENT 01 RFQ N6817125Q0007.pdf | ||
| _Attachment 4 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PLAN updated.pdf | ||
| _Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| _Attachment 4 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PLAN.pdf | ||
| _Attachment 5 SELF CERTIFICATION of AntiMafia communication information EN version.pdf | ||
| 2.0 REQUEST OF QUOTE N6817125Q0007.pdf | ||
| _Attachment 3 QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment (1) Past Performance Information Source Selection Information see FAR 3.104
RFQ N6817125Q0007
Reference #1 Reference #2 Reference #3 Contract Number(s) and type of contract
Procuring agency and name of reference point(s) of contact (not to exceed 3) and telephone number(s) at the Federal, State, Local Government or commercial entity for which the contract was performed
Euro/Dollar value of the contract
Period of performance
Detailed Description of the work
Clear statements describing whether the contract was completed on time, with a quality product conforming to the contract, without any degradation in performance or customer satisfaction.
Discuss any cost growth if the contract was not completed for the original contract amount
The number, type, frequency, duration and impact of any quality, delivery or cost problems in performing the contract, the corrective action taken, if any, and the effectiveness of the corrective action
Does the contractor consider their past performance to be very relevant and why:
See definitions below relevant and why:
somewhat relevant and why:
NOT relevant and why:
The definitions for “Relevant”, ”Not Relevant” “scope”, “size” and “complexity” are as follows:
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings
Adjectival Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Scope Defined as having experience in the areas defined in the PWS
Magnitude The measure of the similarity of the dollar value of actually performed work that exists between the PWS and the quoter’s referenced contracts during the stated three-year period established by the solicitation.
Complexity Defined as degree of functions performed
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .