Attachment 2-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 168 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAGONFLY PARACHUTE DECELERATOR SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80LARC22R0001
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center. The opportunity is soliciting proposals for a Dragonfly Parachute Decelerator System to provide design, fabrication, delivery and associated data for a parachute decelerator subsystem. Key requirements include experience developing, qualifying and using a multi-stage parachute system with mortar deployment of the first parachute and pilot parachutes for subsequent stages. The contract type will be cost-plus-fixed-fee, with a potential period of performance of four and a half years. The anticipated award date is February 11, 2022. Offerors must submit proposals through NASA's Enterprise File Sharing and Sync Box by December 3, 2021 and encourage past performance references to submit questionnaires to the contracting officer by the proposal due date.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DRAGONFLY PARACHUTE DECELERATOR SYSTEM, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30 Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Amend 02 Documents.zip ZIP file
SF30 Amendment 01.pdf PDF
Attachment 8-DF-PDS Supplemental Dcs.zip ZIP file
80LARC22R0001 RFP.pdf PDF
Exhibit B SOW Reqs Final Release V1.pdf PDF
Attachment 4-OCI Instructions.pdf PDF
Attachment 1-Cost Forms Dragonfly.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit A DF PDS SOW Final Release V1.pdf PDF
Exhibit C SOW DRL_DRD Final Release V1.pdf PDF
Attachment 3-Blackout Notice.pdf PDF
Attachment 5-NASA OCI Guide.pdf PDF
Attachment 6-Sample Consent Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment 7-SF1408.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE

This questionnaire contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 2.101 & 3.104

I. CONTRACT INFORMATION

A. Company Being Evaluated and Contract Information:

Company Name (Specific Division) Company Address

Cage Code or DUNS number Contract Number Task Order/Delivery Order Number (if applicable)

Total Contract Value Total Task Order/Delivery Order Value (if applicable)

Period of Performance Start Date: End Date:

Description of Work Performed (or attached SOW or PWS)

Award/Incentive Fee (provide ratings that the contractor received over the past 5 years

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

Rating Period: Rating:

*Please attach available award fee letters

B. Contract Type (Check all that apply):

Check all that apply: Check all that apply:

Prime Contractor Firm Fixed Price Subcontractor Cost Plus Fixed Fee Joint Venture Partner/Team

Member Cost Plus Award Fee

Other: ___________ Time & Materials Other: _______________

II. EVALUATOR(S) THAT COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE:

*If possible, please ensure the Technical Customer (PM, COR, QAE) and CO jointly complete/coordinate on the questionnaire.

Name(s) Title(s) Agency/Organization Email Address

Phone Number Role in Program/Contract

III. PERFORMANCE RATINGS & AMOUNT OF WORK PERFORMED (RELEVANCE): Circle or highlight the rating for the appropriate blocks for both “Performance” and “Amount of Work Performed” for each SOW/PWS element listed below using the adjective ratings and definitions above:

E = Exceptional, VG = Very Good, S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N/A = Not Applicable

SIG = Significant, MOD = Moderate, MIN = Minimal, N/A = Not Applicable

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

ELEMENTS

PERFORMANCE RATINGS

From High To Low

E, VG, S, M, U, NA

(Please Circle One)

AMOUNT OF WORK

PERFORMED

From High To Low Sig, Mod, Min, NA

(Please Circle One) 1 Development of 2-stage (or more) parachute decelerator subsystem in which the first parachute is deployed by mortar, and subsequent parachutes are deployed by pilot parachutes.

(Applicable to SOW Section 1.4)

E VG S M U N/A SIG MOD MIN N/A

2 Qualification of 2-stage (or more) parachute decelerator subsystem in which the first parachute is deployed by mortar, and subsequent parachutes are deployed by pilot parachutes.

(Applicable to SOW Section 1.4)

E

VG S M U N/A SIG MOD MIN N/A

3 Use in Flight of 2-stage (or more) parachute decelerator subsystem in which the first parachute is deployed by mortar, and subsequent parachutes are deployed by pilot parachutes.

(Applicable to SOW Section 1.4)

E VG S M U N/A SIG MOD MIN N/A

IV. General Performance Questions: Assess the contractor’s general performance in areas identified below. Additional pages may be used for comments if desired. Please keep in mind that only performance in the past fifteen (15) years is relevant to our procurement. If you cannot answer any questions, please circle Not Applicable (N/A).

GENERAL PERFORMANCE AREAS

PERFORMANCE RATING

From High To Low

E, VG, S, M, U, N/A

(Please Select One)

1) Quality of Services

E VG S M U N/A

2) Schedule E VG S M U N/A

3) Cost Control

E VG S M U N/A

4) Management E VG S M U N/A

5) Small Business Subcontracting

E VG S M U N/A

6) Regulatory Compliance

E VG S M U N/A

7) E VG S M U N/A

8) E VG S M U N/A

9) Would you award another contract to this company for the same or similar work?

Other Comments: Are there any other comments you may feel are pertinent (e.g. strong or weak points in performance of this contract):

Rate the contractor’s overall performance under this contract E VG S M U N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .