Attachment 2_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
MOBILITY PROTOTYPING
Solicitation number
N0016426RMP01
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for solicitation N0016426RMP01, a Mobility Prototyping MAC solicitation issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command. The document is sent to past customers or contract administrators to gather reference information on a prospective contractor's performance. Responses must be submitted to the Government Point of Contact, Ashley N. Bechtel, at ashley.n.bechtel2.civ@us.navy.mil no later than 18 May 2026. Respondents are instructed not to return the completed questionnaire to the contractor but to submit it directly to the Government.

The questionnaire evaluates contractor performance across three primary categories: Quality of Product or Service (conformance to specifications, report accuracy, and personnel appropriateness); Schedule (timeliness, milestone achievement, and on-time completion); and Business Relationships (effective management, communication, responsiveness to direction, subcontractor management, and small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting practices). Evaluators rate performance using a five-point scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory, with narrative explanations required for ratings of Exceptional or Unsatisfactory. This template does not specify particular products or services but serves as an evaluation instrument for assessing contractor qualifications for the mobility prototyping effort.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment N0016426RMP010001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 3_QASP.pdf PDF
Exhibit A_CDRLs A001-A018.pdf PDF
Solicitation - N0016426RMP01.pdf PDF
Attachment 1_Past Performance Matrix.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire (Solicitation Attachment 02)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N0016426RMP01

Competition Sensitive

TO:

AGENCY:

ADDRESS:

POC:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Our company is planning to submit a proposal to the Government and would like to request that you complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire and submit it to the Government POC via e-mail at ashley.n.bechtel2.civ@us.navy.mil. Specifically, we are requesting that you provide information regarding performance under Contract No ___________. The Government is specifically looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

c.) Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

In order for the Government to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, no later than 18 May 2026 to ashley.n.bechtel2.civ@us.navy.mil. DO NOT RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO US.

The following is the rating and definition to be used while completing this Past Performance Questionnaire.

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N0016426RMP01

Competition Sensitive

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT/CUSTOMER TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print)

Code

Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

Solicitation Attachment 02 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

N0016426RMP01

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N0016426RMP01

Competition Sensitive For Official Use Only

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

3. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .